Are refactorings less error-prone than other changes?
Title | Are refactorings less error-prone than other changes? |
Publication Type | Conference Paper |
Year of Publication | 2006 |
Authors | Weißgerber, P, Diehl, S |
Secondary Title | Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Mining software repositories |
Pagination | 112–118 |
Publisher | ACM |
Place Published | New York, NY, USA |
ISBN Number | 1-59593-397-2 |
Keywords | argouml, bug reports, bugs, change history, jedit, junit, re-engineering, refactoring, reverse engineering, software evolution, version control |
Abstract | Refactorings are program transformations which should preserve the program behavior. Consequently, we expect that during phases when there are mostly refactorings in the change history of a system, only few new bugs are introduced. For our case study we analyzed the version histories of several open source systems and reconstructed the refactorings performed. Furthermore, we obtained bug reports from various sources depending on the system. Based on this data we identify phases when the above hypothesis holds and those when it doesn't. |
URL | http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1137983.1138011 |
DOI | 10.1145/1137983.1138011 |
Full Text |
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
112AreRefactorings.pdf | 1.26 MB |
- Log in or register to post comments
- Google Scholar
- DOI
- BibTeX
- Tagged
- EndNote XML