Skip to main content area
Home
FLOSShub
free/libre and open source software research resources
  • About
  • News
    • Announcements
    • CFPs
    • Conferences
    • Workshops
  • Resources
    • Data
    • Discussion lists
    • Educational materials
    • Papers
    • Tools
    • Websites
  • Feeds
  • Forums

Search form

Tag cloud

  • source code
  • sourceforge
  • developers
  • email
  • open source
  • cvs
  • apache
  • scm
  • eclipse
  • linux
  • mailing list
  • open source software
More tags

You are here

Home

mono

Contributor Turnover in Libre Software Projects

Submitted by superadmin on Sun, 2009-10-04 21:36
G. Robles and Gonzalez-Barahona, J., “Contributor Turnover in Libre Software Projects”, in OSS2006: Open Source Systems (IFIP 2.13), 2006, pp. 273 - 286.
Taxonomy upgrade extras: 
evolution
Mozilla
cvs
freebsd
gnome
developers
apache
gimp
cvsanaly
core
committers
kde
mono
  • Read more about Contributor Turnover in Libre Software Projects
  • Google Scholar
  • DOI
  • BibTeX
  • Tagged
  • EndNote XML

Recent Publications

  • Managing Hidden Dependencies in OO Software: a Study Based on Open Source Projects
  • Open Source Communities as Liminal Ecosystems
  • Investigating developers' email discussions during decision-making in Python language evolution
  • Developers, Quality Control and Download Volume in Open Source Software (OSS) Projects
Subscribe to Recent PublicationsMore...

FLOSS Project Planets

  • Zero to Mastery: Python Monthly 💻🐍 February 2021
  • Ben Cook: NumPy all: Understanding np.all()
  • PyBites: How to Produce More Content
  • FSF Blogs: New changes to Twitter make it even worse for free software users
  • New changes to Twitter make it even worse for free software users
More

FLOSS Research

  • Modernizing Our Mission Statement
  • The Evolution of OSI as a Workplace
  • OSI and Friends at Virtual FOSDEM
  • The SSPL is Not an Open Source License
  • LCA: Catch Talks by OSI Staff and Community
More

This site has been partially supported by NSF Grant 07-08437. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.