Two peers are better than one: aggregating peer reviews for computing assignments is surprisingly accurate
| Title | Two peers are better than one: aggregating peer reviews for computing assignments is surprisingly accurate |
| Publication Type | Conference Paper |
| Year of Publication | 2009 |
| Authors | Reily, K, Finnerty, PL, Terveen, L |
| Secondary Title | ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work |
| Pagination | 115-124 |
| Date Published | 05/10/2009 |
| Publisher | Association for Computing Machinery |
| Place Published | Sanibel Island, FL |
| ISBN Number | 978-1-60558-500-0 |
| Full Text |
Recent Publications
- Managing Hidden Dependencies in OO Software: a Study Based on Open Source Projects
- Open Source Communities as Liminal Ecosystems
- Investigating developers' email discussions during decision-making in Python language evolution
- Developers, Quality Control and Download Volume in Open Source Software (OSS) Projects
More...FLOSS Project Planets
- www-zh-cn @ Savannah: Welcome our new member - bingchuanjuzi
- Matt Glaman: Lenient Composer Plugin officially replaces lenient packages endpoint
- libtool @ Savannah: libtool-2.5.4 released [stable]
- Trey Hunner: Python Black Friday & Cyber Monday sales (2024)
- Security advisories: Drupal core - Moderately critical - Gadget chain - SA-CORE-2024-008
FLOSS Research
- Give Your Input on the State of Open Source Survey
- Open Data and Open Source AI: Charting a course to get more of both
- The Open Source Initiative and the Eclipse Foundation to Collaborate on Shaping Open Source AI (OSAI) Public Policy
- ClearlyDefined v2.0 adds support for LicenseRefs
- ClearlyDefined at SOSS Fusion 2024: a collaborative solution to Open Source license compliance