@inbook {1602,
	title = {Improving Mozilla{\textquoteright}s In-App Payment Platform},
	booktitle = {Open Source Software: Mobile Open Source Technologies},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology},
	volume = {427},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {103-106},
	publisher = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	organization = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	abstract = {

Nowadays, an in-app payment mechanism is offered in most existing mobile payment solutions. However, current solutions are not flexible and impose certain restrictions: users are limited to predefined payment options and merchants need to adapt their payment mechanisms to each payment provider they use. Ideally mobile payments should be as flexible as possible to be able to target various markets together with users{\textquoteright} spending habits. Mozilla wants to promote an open approach in mobile payments by offering a flexible, easily accessible solution. This solution is analyzed, its shortcomings and possible improvements are discussed leading to an original proposal.
},
	isbn = {978-3-642-55127-7},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-55128-4_13},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55128-4_13},
	author = {Janczukowicz, Ewa and Bouabdallah, Ahmed and Braud, Arnaud and Fromentoux, Ga{\"e}l and Bonnin, Jean-Marie},
	editor = {Corral, Luis and Sillitti, Alberto and Succi, Giancarlo and Vlasenko, Jelena and Wasserman, AnthonyI.}
}
@book {1533,
	title = {Identifying Success Factors for the Mozilla Project},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology Open Source Software: Quality Verification},
	volume = {404},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {45 - 60},
	publisher = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	organization = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	address = {Berlin, Heidelberg},
	abstract = {

The publication of the Netscape source code under free software license and the launch of the Mozilla project constitute a pioneering initiative in the field of free and open source software. However, five years after the publication came years of decline. The market shares rose again after 2004 with the lighter Firefox browser. We propose a case study covering the period from 1998 to 2012. We identify the factors that explain the evolution of the Mozilla project. Our study deepens different success factors identified in the literature. It is based on authors{\textquoteright} experience as well as the abundant literature dedicated to the Netscape company and the Mozilla project. It particularly highlights the importance of the source code complexity, its modularity, the responsibility assignment and the existence of an organisational sponsorship.},
	isbn = {978-3-642-38928-3},
	issn = {1868-422X},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-38928-3_4},
	author = {Viseur, Robert},
	editor = {Petrinja, Etiel and Succi, Giancarlo and Ioini, Nabil and Sillitti, Alberto}
}
@book {1529,
	title = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology Open Source Software: Quality Verification Technological Innovation and Resource Bricolage in Firms: The Role of Open Source Software},
	volume = {404},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {1 - 17},
	publisher = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	organization = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	address = {Berlin, Heidelberg},
	abstract = {Technological resources have been an important source of innovation in companies. They play a key role in the development of new products and services. However, the upfront investment in technical resources to enable the development of these new products and services can be quite high. Therefore, managers ask for well elaborated business cases before making investments. These business cases rely on market research to back up their assumptions rather than in-market testing. We argue that the advent of open source software (OSS) creates an opportunity space for companies to build low-cost prototypes and test their ideas in the market. Little is known about how OSS plays a role in allowing these firms to enhance product development. Using qualitative case studies, the paper sheds light on how OSS acts as a bricolage mechanism for technological innovation in the ICT services industry.},
	isbn = {978-3-642-38928-3},
	issn = {1868-422X},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-38928-3_1},
	url = {http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-38928-3_1},
	author = {Mahajan, Aarti and Clarysse, Bart},
	editor = {Petrinja, Etiel and Succi, Giancarlo and Ioini, Nabil and Sillitti, Alberto}
}
@book {1530,
	title = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology Open Source Software: Quality Verification Empirical Study of the Relation between Open Source Software Use and Productivity of Japan{\textquoteright}s Information Service Industries},
	volume = {404},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {18 - 29},
	publisher = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	organization = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	address = {Berlin, Heidelberg},
	abstract = {

This paper analyzes the relation between OSS (Open Source Software) use and the performance of Japanese information service industry. We first estimate the market value of OSS, an issue which only a few studies have specifically addressed. The results are then used to analyze the economic effect of OSS. Although our study has some methodological limitations regarding the calculation of the market value of OSS, we demonstrate that the economic effect of OSS is generally positive.},
	isbn = {978-3-642-38928-3},
	issn = {1868-422X},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-38928-3_2},
	author = {Noda, Tetsuo and Tanihana, Keisuke},
	editor = {Petrinja, Etiel and Succi, Giancarlo and Ioini, Nabil and Sillitti, Alberto}
}
@book {1531,
	title = {Is It All Lost? A Study of Inactive Open Source Projects},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology Open Source Software: Quality Verification },
	volume = {404},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {61 - 79},
	publisher = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	organization = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	address = {Berlin, Heidelberg},
	abstract = {
Open Source Software (OSS) proponents suggest that when developers lose interest in their project, their last duty is to {\textquotedblleft}hand it off to a competent successor.{\textquotedblright} However, the mechanisms of such a hand-off are not clear, or widely known among OSS developers. As a result, many OSS projects, after a certain long period of evolution, stop evolving, in fact becoming {\textquotedblleft}inactive{\textquotedblright} or {\textquotedblleft}abandoned{\textquotedblright} projects. This paper presents an analysis of the population of projects contained within one of the largest OSS repositories available (SourceForge.net), in order to describe how projects abandoned by their developers can be identified, and to discuss the attributes and characteristics of these inactive projects. In particular, the paper attempts to differentiate projects that experienced maintainability issues from those that are inactive for other reasons, in order to be able to correlate common characteristics to the {\textquotedblleft}failure{\textquotedblright} of these projects.
},
	keywords = {sourceforge},
	isbn = {978-3-642-38928-3},
	issn = {1868-422X},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-38928-3_5},
	url = {http://staff.lero.ie/stol/files/2013/03/2013-Is-It-All-Lost-A-Study-of-Inactive-Open-Source-Projects.pdf},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/2013-Is-It-All-Lost-A-Study-of-Inactive-Open-Source-Projects.pdf},
	author = {Khondu, Jymit and Capiluppi, Andrea and Stol, Klaas},
	editor = {Petrinja, Etiel and Succi, Giancarlo and Ioini, Nabil and Sillitti, Alberto}
}
