@conference {1375,
	title = {The Effects of Diversity in Global, Distributed Collectives: A Study of Open Source Project Success},
	booktitle = {Information Systems Research},
	year = {2012},
	abstract = {Diversity is a defining characteristic of global collectives facilitated by the Internet. Though substantial evidence suggests that diversity has profound implications for a variety of outcomes including performance, member engagement, and withdrawal behavior, the effects of diversity have been predominantly investigated in the context of organizational workgroups or virtual teams. We use a diversity lens to study the success of non-traditional virtual work groups exemplified by open source software (OSS) projects. Building on the diversity literature, we propose that three types of diversity (separation, variety and disparity) influence two critical outcomes for OSS projects: community engagement and market success. We draw on the OSS literature to further suggest that the effects of diversity on market success are moderated by the application development stage. We instantiate the operational definitions of three forms of diversity to the unique context of open source projects. Using archival data from 357 projects hosted on SourceForge, we find that disparity diversity, reflecting variation in participants{\textquoteleft} contribution-based reputation, is positively associated with success. The impact of separation diversity, conceptualized as culture and measured as diversity in the spoken language and country of participants, has a negative impact on community engagement but an unexpected positive effect on market success. Variety diversity, reflected in dispersion in project participant roles, positively influences community engagement and market success. The impact of diversity on market success is conditional on the development stage of the project. We discuss how the study{\textquoteleft}s findings advance the literature on antecedents of OSS success, expand our theoretical understanding of diversity, and present the practical implications of the results for managers of distributed collectives.},
	keywords = {diversity, global collectives, open source software},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/isr_2012.pdf},
	author = {Daniel, Sherae L. and Ritu Agarwal and Stewart, Katherine J.}
}
@conference {1258,
	title = {Exploring Complexity in Open Source Software: Evolutionary Patterns, Antecedents, and Outcomes},
	booktitle = {2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2010)},
	year = {2010},
	note = {"The sample of projects was drawn from SourceForge"
"projects were selected that were built with C++."
"Applying the selection criteria generated a total of 108 projects for analysis"
"Scientific Toolwork{\textquoteright}s Understand (version 1.4)"},
	pages = {1 - 11},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	organization = {IEEE},
	address = {Honolulu, Hawaii, USA},
	abstract = {Software complexity is important to researchers and managers, yet much is unknown about how complexity evolves over the life of a software application and whether different dimensions of software complexity may exhibit similar or different evolutionary patterns. Using cross-sectional and longitudinal data on a sample of 108 open source projects, this research investigated how the complexity of open source project releases varied throughout the life of the project. Functional data analysis was applied to the release histories of the projects and recurring evolutionary patterns were derived. There were projects that saw little evolution, according to their measures of size and structural complexity. However, projects that displayed some evolution often differed on the pattern of evolution depending on whether size or structural complexity was examined. Factors that contribute to and result from the patterns of complexity were evaluated, and implications for research and practice are presented.},
	keywords = {complexity, evolution, fda, life cycle, sourceforge, srda},
	isbn = {978-1-4244-5509-6},
	doi = {10.1109/HICSS.2010.198},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/10-07-02.pdf},
	author = {Darcy, David P. and Daniel, Sherae L. and Stewart, Katherine J.}
}
