@inbook {1734,
	title = {Examining Usability Work and Culture in OSS},
	booktitle = {Open Source Systems: Adoption and Impact},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology},
	volume = {451},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {58-67},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	organization = {Springer International Publishing},
	abstract = {Organizational culture has been recognized as an influential factor affecting the successes and failures of usability work in organizations; however, there is a lack of research on organizational culture in open source software (OSS) development. This paper shows that there are different kinds of cultures in OSS development projects and builds propositions on the relationship between culture and usability work in OSS development projects. Partly those are derived from the literature, partly from an exploratory empirical inquiry. We speculate whether there is an ideal culture type for usability work in OSS development or whether usability work should be modified to fit the different cultures of OSS development projects.
},
	keywords = {culture, empirical study, open source software, Usability},
	isbn = {978-3-319-17836-3},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0_6},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0_6},
	author = {Rajanen, Mikko and Iivari, Netta},
	editor = {Damiani, Ernesto and Frati, Fulvio and Dirk Riehle and Wasserman, Anthony I.}
}
@inbook {1741,
	title = {First Results About Motivation and Impact of License Changes in Open Source Projects},
	booktitle = {Open Source Systems: Adoption and Impact},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology},
	volume = {451},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {137-145},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	organization = {Springer International Publishing},
	abstract = {Free and open source software is characterized by the freedoms and criteria that are warranted by specific licenses. These licenses describe the rights and duties of the licensors and licensees. However, a licensing change may be necessary in the life of an open source project to meet legal developments or to allow the implementation of new business models. This paper examines the motivations and impacts of license changes in open source projects. After a state of the art on the subject, a set of case studies where projects changed their license is presented. Then a set of motivations to change licenses, the ways to legally make this change, the problems caused by this change and a set of benefits of the license change are discussed.
},
	keywords = {Business model, Contributor agreement, intellectual property, license, open source},
	isbn = {978-3-319-17836-3},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0_13},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0_13},
	author = {Viseur, Robert and Gregorio Robles},
	editor = {Damiani, Ernesto and Frati, Fulvio and Dirk Riehle and Wasserman, Anthony I.}
}
@inbook {1732,
	title = {How Developers Acquire FLOSS Skills},
	booktitle = {Open Source Systems: Adoption and Impact},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology},
	volume = {451},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {23-32},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	organization = {Springer International Publishing},
	abstract = {With the increasing prominence of open collaboration as found in free/libre/open source software projects and other joint production communities, potential participants need to acquire skills. How these skills are learned has received little research attention. This article presents a large-scale survey (5,309 valid responses) in which users and developers of the beta release of a popular file download application were asked which learning styles were used to acquire technical and social skills. We find that the extent to which a person acquired the relevant skills through informal methods tends to be higher if the person is a free/libre/open source code contributor, while being a professional software developer does not have this effect. Additionally, younger participants proved more likely to make use of formal methods of learning. These insights will help individuals, commercial companies, educational institutions, governments and open collaborative projects decide how they promote learning.
},
	keywords = {competencies, Informal learning, Non-formal learning, open source, Skills, Software developer},
	isbn = {978-3-319-17836-3},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0_3},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0_3},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/oss-2015.pdf},
	author = {Barcomb, Ann and Grottke, Michael and Stauffert, Jan-Philipp and Dirk Riehle and Jahn, Sabrina},
	editor = {Damiani, Ernesto and Frati, Fulvio and Dirk Riehle and Wasserman, Anthony I.}
}
@inbook {1738,
	title = {A Qualitative Study on the Adoption of Open Source Software in Information Technology Outsourcing Organizations},
	booktitle = {Open Source Systems: Adoption and Impact},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology},
	volume = {451},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {103-113},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	organization = {Springer International Publishing},
	abstract = {The purpose of this paper is to identify the influence of Outsourcing on Open source software (OSS) and further investigate the factors that impact the adoption of OSS in global Information Technology (IT) outsourcing organizations serviced by Indian IT services providers. This exploratory research adopted positivism research philosophy and qualitative approach. An in-depth interview was conducted with ten participants across IT outsourcing organizations, IT service providers, and OSS service providers. The results show that IT outsourcing was not found to have an impact on OSS adoption. However, eight factors including management support and OSS support availability was identified to influence OSS adoption. IT services providers can utilize this research model to increase their understanding of why some IT outsourcing organizations choose to adopt OSS, while seemingly similar ones facing similar market conditions do not.
},
	keywords = {Diffusion of innovation, Indian IT, IT outsourcing, open source software, OSS adoption, TOE},
	isbn = {978-3-319-17836-3},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0_10},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0_10},
	author = {Ramanathan, Lakshmanan and Iyer, Sundaresan Krishnan},
	editor = {Damiani, Ernesto and Frati, Fulvio and Dirk Riehle and Wasserman, Anthony I.}
}
@inbook {1740,
	title = {The RISCOSS Platform for Risk Management in Open Source Software Adoption},
	booktitle = {Open Source Systems: Adoption and Impact},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology},
	volume = {451},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {124-133},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	organization = {Springer International Publishing},
	abstract = {Managing risks related to OSS adoption is a must for organizations that need to smoothly integrate OSS-related practices in their development processes. Adequate tool support may pave the road to effective risk management and ensure the sustainability of such activity. In this paper, we present the RISCOSS platform for managing risks in OSS adoption. RISCOSS builds upon a highly configurable data model that allows customization to several types of scopes. It implements two different working modes: exploration, where the impact of decisions may be assessed before making them; and continuous assessment, where risk variables (and their possible consequences on business goals) are continuously monitored and reported to decision-makers. The blackboard-oriented architecture of the platform defines several interfaces for the identified techniques, allowing new techniques to be plugged in.
},
	keywords = {Open source adoption, Open Source Projects, open source software, OSS, Risk Management, Software platform},
	isbn = {978-3-319-17836-3},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0_12},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0_12},
	author = {Franch, X. and Kenett, R. and Mancinelli, F. and Susi, A. and Ameller, D. and Annosi, M.C. and Ben-Jacob, R. and Blumenfeld, Y. and Franco, O.H. and Gross, D. and Lopez, L. and Morandini, M. and Oriol, M. and Siena, A.},
	editor = {Damiani, Ernesto and Frati, Fulvio and Dirk Riehle and Wasserman, Anthony I.}
}
@inbook {1737,
	title = {Smart Route Planning Using Open Data and Participatory Sensing},
	booktitle = {Open Source Systems: Adoption and Impact},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology},
	volume = {451},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {91-100},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	organization = {Springer International Publishing},
	abstract = {Smart cities are not merely the infusion of technology into a city{\textquoteright}s infrastructure, but also require citizens interacting with their urban environment in a smart and informed manner. Transportation is key aspect of smart cities. In this paper, we present a smart route planning open-source system; SMART-GH utilizes open data and participatory sensing, where citizens actively participate in collecting data about the city in their daily environment, e.g., noise, air pollution, etc. SMART-GH then augments the routing logic with sensor data to answer queries such as {\textquoteleft}return the least noisy route{\textquoteright}. SMART-GH enables citizens to make smarter decisions about their daily commute, and subsequently improve their quality of life.
},
	keywords = {Open-data, open-source, Participatory sensing, Smart-city-routing},
	isbn = {978-3-319-17836-3},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0_9},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0_9},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/nallur15.pdf},
	author = {Nallur, Vivek and Elgammal, Amal and Clarke, Siobh{\'a}n},
	editor = {Damiani, Ernesto and Frati, Fulvio and Dirk Riehle and Wasserman, Anthony I.}
}
@inbook {1736,
	title = {A Systematic Approach for Evaluating BPM Systems: Case Studies on Open Source and Proprietary Tools},
	booktitle = {Open Source Systems: Adoption and Impact},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology},
	volume = {451},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {81-90},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	organization = {Springer International Publishing},
	abstract = {Business Process Management Systems (BPMS) provide support for modeling, developing, deploying, executing and evaluating business processes in an organization. Selecting a BPMS is not a trivial task, not only due to the many existing alternatives, both in the open source and proprietary realms, but also because it requires a thorough evaluation of its capabilities, contextualizing them in the organizational environment in which they will be used. In this paper we present a methodology to guide the systematic evaluation of BPMS that takes into account the specific needs of each organization. It provides a list of key characteristics of BPMS which are ranked by the organization and evaluated using test cases and quantitative criteria. We also present case studies of open source and proprietary BPMS evaluations following our proposal.
},
	keywords = {Business Process Management Systems (BPMS), Evaluation methodology, Open source and proprietary BPMS, Systematic approach},
	isbn = {978-3-319-17836-3},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0_8},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0_8},
	author = {Delgado, Andrea and Calegari, Daniel and Milanese, Pablo and Falcon, Renatta and Garc{\'\i}a, Esteban},
	editor = {Damiani, Ernesto and Frati, Fulvio and Dirk Riehle and Wasserman, Anthony I.}
}
@book {1546,
	title = {A Dual Model of Open Source License Growth},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication TechnologyOpen Source Software: Quality Verification},
	volume = {404},
	year = {2013},
	note = {uses ohloh snapshot, march 2008},
	pages = {245 - 256},
	publisher = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	organization = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	address = {Berlin, Heidelberg},
	abstract = {

Every open source project needs to decide on an open source license. This decision is of high economic relevance: Just which license is the best one to help the project grow and attract a community? The most common question is: Should the project choose a restrictive (reciprocal) license or a more permissive one? As an important step towards answering this question, this paper analyses actual license choice and correlated project growth from ten years of open source projects. It provides closed analytical models and finds that around 2001 a reversal in license choice occurred from restrictive towards permissive licenses.
},
	keywords = {ohloh},
	isbn = {978-3-642-38928-3},
	issn = {1868-422X},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-38928-3_18},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/oss2013.hofmann.pdf},
	author = {Hofmann, Gottfried and Dirk Riehle and Carsten Kolassa and Mauerer, Wolfgang},
	editor = {Petrinja, Etiel and Succi, Giancarlo and Ioini, Nabil and Sillitti, Alberto}
}
