@article {flosswp77,
	title = {Guarding the Commons: How Community Managed Software Projects Protect Their Work},
	journal = {Research Policy},
	volume = {32},
	year = {2003},
	note = {"Data was collected from three primary sources: 1) observation at project and user group meetings, technical presentations and conferences; 2) informant interviews; and 3) project data archived on the Internet that detailed project interactions and structural developments."

"Project data was collected from online archives and included documents such as: mission statements, charters, bylaws, meeting minutes, and mailing list archives."},
	month = {February},
	pages = {1179-1198},
	edition = {7},
	abstract = {Theorists often speculate why open source and free software project contributors give their work away. Although contributors make their work publicly available, they do not forfeit their rights to it. Community managed software projects protect their work by using several legal and normative tactics, which should not be conflated with a disregard for or neglect of intellectual property rights. These tactics allow a project?s intellectual property to be publicly and freely available and yet, governable. Exploration of this seemingly contradictory state may provide new insight into governance models for the management of digital intellectual property.},
	keywords = {Common Pool Resources, email, email archives, intellectual property, mailing list, open source, Public Goods, Software, Survey},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/rp-omahony.pdf},
	author = {Siobhan O{\textquoteright}Mahony}
}
@article {flosswp122,
	title = {Managing the Boundary of an {\textquoteright}Open{\textquoteright} Project},
	year = {2003},
	month = {October},
	abstract = {In the past ten years, the boundaries between public and open science and commercial research efforts have become more porous. Scholars have thus more critically examined ways in which these two institutional regimes intersect. Large open source software projects have also attracted commercial collaborators and now struggle to develop code in an open public environment that still protects their communal boundaries. This research applies a dynamic social network approach to understand how one community managed software project, Debian, develops a membership process. We examine the project{\textquoteright}s face-to-face social network during a five-year period (1997-2001) to see how changes in the social structure affect the evolution of membership mechanisms and the determination of gatekeepers. While the amount and importance of a contributor{\textquoteright}s work increases the probability that a contributor will become a gatekeeper, those more central in the social network are more likely to become gatekeepers and influence the membership process. A greater understanding of the mechanisms open projects use to manage their boundaries has critical implications for research and knowledge producing communities operating in pluralistic, open and distributed environments.},
	keywords = {debian, membership, social network analysis},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/omahonyferraro.pdf},
	author = {Siobhan O{\textquoteright}Mahony}
}
