@inbook {1734,
	title = {Examining Usability Work and Culture in OSS},
	booktitle = {Open Source Systems: Adoption and Impact},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology},
	volume = {451},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {58-67},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	organization = {Springer International Publishing},
	abstract = {Organizational culture has been recognized as an influential factor affecting the successes and failures of usability work in organizations; however, there is a lack of research on organizational culture in open source software (OSS) development. This paper shows that there are different kinds of cultures in OSS development projects and builds propositions on the relationship between culture and usability work in OSS development projects. Partly those are derived from the literature, partly from an exploratory empirical inquiry. We speculate whether there is an ideal culture type for usability work in OSS development or whether usability work should be modified to fit the different cultures of OSS development projects.
},
	keywords = {culture, empirical study, open source software, Usability},
	isbn = {978-3-319-17836-3},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0_6},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0_6},
	author = {Rajanen, Mikko and Iivari, Netta},
	editor = {Damiani, Ernesto and Frati, Fulvio and Dirk Riehle and Wasserman, Anthony I.}
}
@inbook {1736,
	title = {A Systematic Approach for Evaluating BPM Systems: Case Studies on Open Source and Proprietary Tools},
	booktitle = {Open Source Systems: Adoption and Impact},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology},
	volume = {451},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {81-90},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	organization = {Springer International Publishing},
	abstract = {Business Process Management Systems (BPMS) provide support for modeling, developing, deploying, executing and evaluating business processes in an organization. Selecting a BPMS is not a trivial task, not only due to the many existing alternatives, both in the open source and proprietary realms, but also because it requires a thorough evaluation of its capabilities, contextualizing them in the organizational environment in which they will be used. In this paper we present a methodology to guide the systematic evaluation of BPMS that takes into account the specific needs of each organization. It provides a list of key characteristics of BPMS which are ranked by the organization and evaluated using test cases and quantitative criteria. We also present case studies of open source and proprietary BPMS evaluations following our proposal.
},
	keywords = {Business Process Management Systems (BPMS), Evaluation methodology, Open source and proprietary BPMS, Systematic approach},
	isbn = {978-3-319-17836-3},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0_8},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0_8},
	author = {Delgado, Andrea and Calegari, Daniel and Milanese, Pablo and Falcon, Renatta and Garc{\'\i}a, Esteban},
	editor = {Damiani, Ernesto and Frati, Fulvio and Dirk Riehle and Wasserman, Anthony I.}
}
