@conference {Robles:2014:FSD:2597073.2597129,
	title = {FLOSS 2013: A Survey Dataset About Free Software Contributors: Challenges for Curating, Sharing, and Combining},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories},
	series = {MSR 2014},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {396{\textendash}399},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {In this data paper we describe a data set obtained by means of performing an on-line survey to over 2,000 Free Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) contributors. The survey includes questions related to personal characteristics (gender, age, civil status, nationality, etc.), education and level of English, professional status, dedication to FLOSS projects, reasons and motivations, involvement and goals. We describe as well the possibilities and challenges of using private information from the survey when linked with other, publicly available data sources. In this regard, an example of data sharing will be presented and legal, ethical and technical issues will be discussed.
},
	keywords = {anonymization, data combining, data sharing, ethics, free software, microdata, msr data showcase, open data, open source, privacy, Survey},
	isbn = {978-1-4503-2863-0},
	doi = {10.1145/2597073.2597129},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2597073.2597129},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/msr14gregorio.pdf},
	author = {Gregorio Robles and Reina, Laura Arjona and Serebrenik, Alexander and Vasilescu, Bogdan and Gonz{\'a}lez-Barahona, Jes{\'u}s M.}
}
@conference {Vasilescu:2014:SQS:2531602.2531659,
	title = {How Social Q\&A Sites Are Changing Knowledge Sharing in Open Source Software Communities},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work \&\#38; Social Computing},
	series = {CSCW {\textquoteright}14},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {342{\textendash}354},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {Historically, mailing lists have been the preferred means for coordinating development and user support activities. With the emergence and popularity growth of social Q\&A sites such as the StackExchange network (e.g., StackOverflow), this is beginning to change. Such sites offer different socio-technical incentives to their participants than mailing lists do, e.g., rich web environments to store and manage content collaboratively, or a place to showcase their knowledge and expertise more vividly to peers or potential recruiters. A key difference between StackExchange and mailing lists is gamification, i.e., StackExchange participants compete to obtain reputation points and badges. In this paper, we use a case study of R (a widely-used tool for data analysis) to investigate how mailing list participation has evolved since the launch of StackExchange. Our main contribution is the assembly of a joint data set from the two sources, in which participants in both the texttt{r-help} mailing list and StackExchange are identifiable. This permits their activities to be linked across the two resources and also over time. With this data set we found that user support activities show a strong shift away from texttt{r-help}. In particular, mailing list experts are migrating to StackExchange, where their behaviour is different. First, participants active both on texttt{r-help} and on StackExchange are more active than those who focus exclusively on only one of the two. Second, they provide faster answers on StackExchange than on texttt{r-help}, suggesting they are motivated by the emph{gamified} environment. To our knowledge, our study is the first to directly chart the changes in behaviour of specific contributors as they migrate into gamified environments, and has important implications for knowledge management in software engineering.},
	keywords = {a, crowdsourced knowledge, gamification., mailing lists, open source, social q\&\#38},
	isbn = {978-1-4503-2540-0},
	doi = {10.1145/2531602.2531659},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2531602.2531659},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/cscw14.pdf},
	author = {Vasilescu, Bogdan and Serebrenik, Alexander and Devanbu, Prem and Filkov, Vladimir}
}
@conference {1406,
	title = {Process Mining Software Repositories},
	booktitle = {15th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR 2011) },
	year = {2011},
	pages = {5 - 14},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	organization = {IEEE},
	address = {Oldenburg, Germany},
	abstract = {Software developers{\textquoteright} activities are in general recorded in software repositories such as version control systems, bug trackers and mail archives. While abundant information is usually present in such repositories, successful information extraction is often challenged by the necessity to simultaneously analyze different repositories and to combine the information obtained.

We propose to apply process mining techniques, originally developed for business process analysis, to address this challenge. However, in order for process mining to become applicable, different software repositories should be combined, and {\textquotedblleft}related{\textquotedblright} software development events should be matched: e.g., mails sent about a file, modifications of the file and bug reports that can be traced back to it.

The combination and matching of events has been implemented in FRASR (FRamework for Analyzing Software Repositories), augmenting the process mining framework ProM. FRASR has been successfully applied in a series of case studies addressing such aspects of the development process as roles of different developers and the way bug reports are handled.},
	keywords = {amsn, email, email archives, gcc, mailing list, Process mining, software repositories},
	isbn = {978-1-61284-259-2},
	doi = {10.1109/CSMR.2011.5},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/2011-03_CSMR.pdf},
	author = {Poncin, Wouter and Serebrenik, Alexander and Brand, Mark van den}
}
