@conference {Farah:2014:OSA:2597073.2597135,
	title = {OpenHub: A Scalable Architecture for the Analysis of Software Quality Attributes},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories},
	series = {MSR 2014},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {420{\textendash}423},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {There is currently a vast array of open source projects available on the web, and although they are searchable by name or description in the search engines, there is no way to search for projects by how well they perform on a given set of quality attributes (e.g. usability or maintainability). With OpenHub, we present a scalable and extensible architecture for the static and runtime analysis of open source repositories written in Python, presenting the architecture and pinpointing future possibilities with it.
},
	keywords = {architecture, github, python, Quality Attributes},
	isbn = {978-1-4503-2863-0},
	doi = {10.1145/2597073.2597135},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2597073.2597135},
	author = {Farah, Gabriel and Tejada, Juan Sebastian and Correal, Dario}
}
@conference {Gurbani:2006:CSC:1134285.1134352,
	title = {A case study of a corporate open source development model},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering},
	series = {ICSE {\textquoteright}06},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {472{\textendash}481},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {Open source practices and tools have proven to be highly effective for overcoming the many problems of geographically distributed software development. We know relatively little, however, about the range of settings in which they work. In particular, can corporations use the open source development model effectively for software projects inside the corporate domain? Or are these tools and practices incompatible with development environments, management practices, and market-driven schedule and feature decisions typical of a commercial software house? We present a case study of open source software development methodology adopted by a significant commercial software project in the telecommunications domain. We extract a number of lessons learned from the experience, and identify open research questions.},
	keywords = {architecture, case study, open source, session initiation protocol, software development, vkg},
	isbn = {1-59593-375-1},
	doi = {10.1145/1134285.1134352},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1134285.1134352},
	author = {Gurbani, Vijay K. and Garvert, Anita and Herbsleb, James D.}
}
@conference {1135,
	title = {Software Architectures and Open Source Software {\textendash} Where can Research Leverage the Most?},
	booktitle = {1st Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering at ICSE 2001},
	year = {2001},
	month = {05/2001},
	abstract = {Software architectures have been playing a central role in software engineering research for some years now. They are considered of pivotal importance in the success of complex software systems development. However, with the emergence of Open Source Software (OSS) development, a new opportunity for studying architectural issues arises. In this paper, we introduce accepted notions of software architectures (Section 2), discuss some of the known issues in OSS (Section 3), resulting in a set of aspects we consider to be relevant for future research (Section 4).},
	keywords = {architecture, software architecture},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/ariefgaceklawrie.pdf},
	author = {Arief, B. and Gacek, C. and Lawrie, T.}
}
@conference {1142,
	title = {Software Engineering Research in the Bazaar},
	booktitle = {1st Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering at ICSE 2001},
	year = {2001},
	note = {"To gain a better understanding of a software system, we recover its software architecture from the system{\textquoteright}s source code.
We recovered the architecture of many open source systems such as the Linux kernel [3], the Mozilla browser [5], the Apache web server [7], and the VIM editor [14]. The recovered architecture is browse-able to permit developers to interact with it, [10] shows an example for the Linux kernel."},
	abstract = {During the last five years, our research group has studied the architecture and evolution of several large open source systems {\textemdash} including Linux, GCC, VIM, Mozilla, and Apache {\textemdash} and we have found that open source software systems often exhibit interesting differences when compared to similar commercially-developed systems. Our investigations of these systems have involved the creation of software architecture models, software architecture repair, the creation of a reference architecture for web servers, the study of evolution and growth of open source systems, and the modelling of architectural properties of systems that are apparent only at build time.},
	keywords = {apache, architecture, gcc, kernel, linux, linux kernel, mozilla, open source software, software architecture, Software Engineering Research, source code, vim},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/hassangodfreyholt.pdf},
	author = {Hassan, Ahmed E. and Godfrey, Michael W. and Holt, Richard C.}
}
