@proceedings {1772,
	title = {An Empirical Study of Architectural Change in Open-Source Software Systems},
	year = {2015},
	month = {05/2015},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	abstract = {From its very inception, the study of software
architecture has recognized architectural decay as a regularly
occurring phenomenon in long-lived systems. Architectural decay
is caused by repeated changes to a system during its lifespan.
Despite decay{\textquoteright}s prevalence, there is a relative dearth of empirical
data regarding the nature of architectural changes that may lead
to decay, and of developers{\textquoteright} understanding of those changes. In
this paper, we take a step toward addressing that scarcity by
conducting an empirical study of changes found in software
architectures spanning several hundred versions of 14 opensource
systems. Our study reveals several new findings regarding
the frequency of architectural changes in software systems, the
common points of departure in a system{\textquoteright}s architecture during
maintenance and evolution, the difference between system-level
and component-level architectural change, and the suitability
of a system{\textquoteright}s implementation-level structure as a proxy for its
architecture.},
	keywords = {architectural change, architecture recovery, open-source systems, software architecture, software evolution},
	url = {http://softarch.usc.edu/~pooyan/publications/emparch_msr15.pdf},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/emparch_msr15.pdf},
	author = {Duc Minh Le and Pooyan Behnamghader and Joshua Garcia{\textdaggerdbl} Daniel Link and Arman Shahbazian and Nenad Medvidovic}
}
@proceedings {1279,
	title = {The Importance of Architectural Knowledge in Integrating Open Source Software},
	year = {2011},
	month = {10/2011},
	pages = {142-158},
	publisher = {Springer},
	abstract = {Open Source Software (OSS) is increasingly used in Component-Based Software Development (CBSD) of large software systems. An important issue in CBSD is selection of suitable components. Various OSS selection methods have been proposed, but most of them do not consider the software architecture aspects of OSS products. The Software Architecture (SA) research community refers to a product{\textquoteright}s architectural information, such as design decisions and underlying rationale, and used architecture patterns, as Architecture Knowledge (AK). In order to investigate the importance of AK of OSS components in integration, we conducted an exploratory empirical study. Based on in-depth interviews with 12 IT professionals, this paper presents insights into the following questions: 1) what AK of OSS is needed? 2) Why is AK of OSS needed? 3) Is AK of OSS generally available? And 4) what is the relative importance of AK? Based on these new insights, we provide a research agenda to further the research field of software architecture in OSS.},
	keywords = {architectural knowledge, component-based development, Open Source Software integration, OSS Integrator, software architecture, Survey},
	author = {Stol, Klaas-Jan and Ali Babar, Muhammad and Avgeriou, Paris}
}
@conference {Fielding:2005:SAO:1062455.1062474,
	title = {Software architecture in an open source world},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Software engineering},
	series = {ICSE {\textquoteright}05},
	year = {2005},
	pages = {43{\textendash}43},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {In spite of the hype and hysteria surrounding open source software development, there is very little that can be said of open source in general. Open source projects range in scope from the miniscule, such as the thousands of non-maintained code dumps left behind at the end of class projects, dissertations, and failed commercial ventures, to the truly international, with thousands of developers collaborating, directly or indirectly, on a common platform. One characteristic that is shared by the largest and most successful open source projects, however, is a software architecture designed to promote anarchic collaboration through extensions while at the same time preserving centralized control over the interfaces. This talk features a survey of the state-of-the-practice in open source development in regards to software architecture, with particular emphasis on the modular extensibility interfaces within several of the most successful projects, including Apache httpd, Eclipse, Mozilla Firefox, Linux kernel, and the World Wide Web (which few people recognize as an open source project in itself). These projects fall under the general category of collaborative open source software development, which emphasizes community aspects of software engineering in order to compensate for the often-volunteer nature of core developers and take advantage of the scalability obtainable through Internet-based virtual organizations.},
	keywords = {apache, collaborative open source development, eclipse, extensibility, Firefox, linux, linux kernel, loose coupling, modularity, mozilla, open source, software architecture},
	isbn = {1-58113-963-2},
	doi = {10.1145/1062455.1062474},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1062455.1062474},
	author = {Roy T. Fielding}
}
@conference {Godfrey:2001:GES:602461.602482,
	title = {Growth, evolution, and structural change in open source software},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution (IWPSE 2001)},
	series = {IWPSE {\textquoteright}01},
	year = {2001},
	note = {"We measured [linux] system size in uncommented LOC"
"We also examined the growth of several other open source systems, including the VIM text editor, Eric Raymond{\textquoteright}s fetchmail utility, and the GCC compiler suite. "},
	pages = {103{\textendash}106},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {Our recent work has addressed how and why software systems evolve over time, with a particular emphasis on software architecture and open source software systems [2, 3, 6]. In this position paper, we present a short summary of two recent projects. First, we have performed a case study on the evolution of the Linux kernel [3], as well as some other open source software (OSS) systems. We have found that several OSS systems appear not to obey some of "Lehman{\textquoteright}s laws" of software evolution [5, 7], and that Linux in particular is continuing to grow at a geometric rate. Currently, we are working on a detailed study of the evolution of one of the subsystems of the Linux kernel: the SCSI drivers subsystem. We have found that cloning, which is usually considered to be an indicator of lazy development and poor process, is quite common and is even considered to be a useful practice. Second, we are developing a tool called Beagle to aid software maintainers in understanding how large systems have changed over time. Beagle integrates data from various static analysis and metrics tools and provides a query engine as well as navigable visualizations. Of particular note, Beagle aims to provide help in modelling long term evolution of systems that have undergone architectural and structural change.},
	keywords = {agile methods, beagle, cloning, evolution, fetchmail, gcc, growth, kernel, lehman{\textquoteright}s laws, lines of code, linux, linux kernel, loc, open source software, software architecture, software evolution, source code, structural change, supporting environments, vim},
	isbn = {1-58113-508-4},
	doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/602461.602482},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/602461.602482},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/tu2001.pdf},
	author = {Michael Godfrey and Tu, Qiang}
}
@conference {1135,
	title = {Software Architectures and Open Source Software {\textendash} Where can Research Leverage the Most?},
	booktitle = {1st Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering at ICSE 2001},
	year = {2001},
	month = {05/2001},
	abstract = {Software architectures have been playing a central role in software engineering research for some years now. They are considered of pivotal importance in the success of complex software systems development. However, with the emergence of Open Source Software (OSS) development, a new opportunity for studying architectural issues arises. In this paper, we introduce accepted notions of software architectures (Section 2), discuss some of the known issues in OSS (Section 3), resulting in a set of aspects we consider to be relevant for future research (Section 4).},
	keywords = {architecture, software architecture},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/ariefgaceklawrie.pdf},
	author = {Arief, B. and Gacek, C. and Lawrie, T.}
}
@conference {1142,
	title = {Software Engineering Research in the Bazaar},
	booktitle = {1st Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering at ICSE 2001},
	year = {2001},
	note = {"To gain a better understanding of a software system, we recover its software architecture from the system{\textquoteright}s source code.
We recovered the architecture of many open source systems such as the Linux kernel [3], the Mozilla browser [5], the Apache web server [7], and the VIM editor [14]. The recovered architecture is browse-able to permit developers to interact with it, [10] shows an example for the Linux kernel."},
	abstract = {During the last five years, our research group has studied the architecture and evolution of several large open source systems {\textemdash} including Linux, GCC, VIM, Mozilla, and Apache {\textemdash} and we have found that open source software systems often exhibit interesting differences when compared to similar commercially-developed systems. Our investigations of these systems have involved the creation of software architecture models, software architecture repair, the creation of a reference architecture for web servers, the study of evolution and growth of open source systems, and the modelling of architectural properties of systems that are apparent only at build time.},
	keywords = {apache, architecture, gcc, kernel, linux, linux kernel, mozilla, open source software, software architecture, Software Engineering Research, source code, vim},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/hassangodfreyholt.pdf},
	author = {Hassan, Ahmed E. and Godfrey, Michael W. and Holt, Richard C.}
}
