@article {10.1109/HICSS.2009.998,
	title = {Understanding the Nature and Production Model of Hybrid Free and Open Source Systems: The Case of Varnish},
	journal = {42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2009)},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {1-11},
	publisher = {IEEE Computer Society},
	address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA},
	abstract = {This is a detailed interpretive case study analysis of an open source software project, called Varnish. The conceptual framework is based on the literature covering issues of commons based production models and the organization of open source projects. The comparative analysis reveals that Varnish is a hybrid project, encompassing the features of open source software while managed by a company as a proprietary project would. It is also hybrid in the sense that it employs a combination of hierarchical and commons based peer production model features. This mix of characters addresses a variety of problems related to each of the aforementioned categories.},
	keywords = {case study, organizational sponsorship, peer production, varnish},
	isbn = {978-0-7695-3450-3},
	doi = {http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/HICSS.2009.998},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/07-07-02.pdf},
	author = {Zegaye Seifu Wubishet}
}
@article {DBLP:journals/electronicmarkets/Joode04,
	title = {Managing Conflicts in Open Source Communities},
	journal = {Electronic Markets},
	volume = {14},
	number = {2},
	year = {2004},
	pages = {104-113},
	abstract = {An increasing number of companies adopt open source software. These companies will typically pay programmers to participate in the design, development and maintenance of open source software. The programmers, however, are reported to have different interests compared to the voluntary programmers who dominate most open source communities. The diversity of interest will inevitably result in conflicts. To ensure that their interests are achieved, companies should understand how conflicts between their programmers and the voluntary programmers can be managed. The aim of this paper is to identify and discuss mechanisms that are currently present to manage conflicts in open source communities.

The mechanisms identified in this paper are based on an explorative literature study and on 48 semi-structured interviews with programmers from a variety of open source communities. Four mechanisms have been identified and their relevance in the management of conflicts are discussed. They are: third-party intervention; modularity; parallel software development lines; and the exit option. The paper ends with an example of Covalent, which deploys parallel software development lines to manage conflicts in the Apache community. },
	keywords = {abiword, apache, conflict, covalent, interviews, organizational sponsorship, Volunteers},
	author = {Ruben van Wendel de Joode}
}
@proceedings {104,
	title = {Economic incentives for participating in open source software projects},
	year = {2002},
	note = {"The data for this research come from two primary sources: Apache project archives and a targeted survey of Apache participants. Archival data are open source project artifacts such as e-mail and source code archives, source code version control meta-data, and developer Web sites"
independent variables: patch, committer, work experience, programming experience, education, job switch, firm size, firm public, industry},
	pages = {365{\textendash}372},
	abstract = {Using the Internet as a basis for communication, collaboration, and storage of artifacts, the open source community is producing software of a quality that was previously thought to be achievable only by professional engineers following strict software development paradigms. This accomplishment is even more astounding as developers contribute to the source code without any remuneration. Open source leaders as well as academics have proposed theories about the motivation of open source developers that are rooted in diverse fields such as social psychology and anthropology. However, Lerner and Tirole (2000) argue that developer participation in open source projects may, in part, be explained by existing economic theory regarding career concerns. This research seeks to confirm or disconfirm the existence of economic returns to participation in open source development. Our findings suggest that greater open source participation per se, as measured in contributions made, is not associated with wage increases. However, a higher status in a merit-based ranking within the Apache Project is associated with significantly higher wages. This suggests that employers do not reward the gain in experience through open source participation as an increase in human capital. The results are also consistent with the notion that a high rank within the Apache Software Foundation is a credible signal of the productive capacity of a programmer.},
	keywords = {apache, contributions, email, email archives, mailing list, organizational sponsorship, participation, patch, scm, source code, Survey, version control},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/42.pdf},
	author = {Il-Horn Hann and Jeff Roberts and Sandra Slaughter and Roy Fielding}
}
@conference {1156,
	title = {The evolution of the GNOME Project},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2nd ICSE Workshop on Open Source},
	year = {2002},
	abstract = {The GNOME Project is an attempt to create a GUI desktop for Unix systems. Originally started by a handful of volunteers in 1996, GNOME has become the desktop of choice for Solaris, HP-UX, and Red Hat Linux, and it is currently developed by a team of approximately five hundred people around the world. The importance of GNOME to the Unix world has attracted the attention of several software companies who are actively participating in its development. At the same time, some of its volunteer developers have created enterprises who expect to sell services and products around GNOME. This extended abstract describes, first, the development model of GNOME, then the influence that private companies had had on the project: on one hand they are contributing a large amount of resources to the project, accelerating its development, and increasing its reliability and documentation; and on the other hand, the GNOME Foundation has been created to maintain the goal of the project to provide a free (as in freedom) software desktop for Unix, and avoid that the commercial interests of these partners could jeopardize the interests of the community.},
	keywords = {commercial software, gnome, organizational sponsorship},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/German.pdf},
	author = {Daniel M. German}
}
@conference {stewart2002an-explorat,
	title = {An Exploratory Study of Factors Influencing the Level of Vitality and Popularity of Open Source Projects},
	booktitle = {ICIS 2002. Proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems 2002},
	year = {2002},
	note = {"We are currently tracking publicly available data on 240 open source projects registered on the freshmeat Website." "First, we randomly selected a total of 120 projects from the utilities, software development, and games and entertainment areas. We then selected 120 projects from these forums that had been registered on the site during the two weeks prior to the start of our data collection effort."},
	month = {2002},
	pages = {1-5},
	abstract = {In this research, we ask the question: What differentiates successful from unsuccessful open source software projects? Using a sample of 240 open source projects, we examine how organizational sponsorship, target audience (developer versus end user), license choice, and development status interact over time to influence the extent to which open source software projects attract user attention and developer activity.},
	keywords = {activity, audience, developers, freshmeat, license analysis, licenses, organizational sponsorship, project success, roles, status, target audience, users},
	author = {Stewart, Katherine J. and Ammeter, Tony}
}
@conference {1141,
	title = {Corporate Source: Applying Open Source Concepts to a Corporate Environment},
	booktitle = {1st Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering at ICSE 2001},
	year = {2001},
	keywords = {commercial software, hewlett packard, hp, organizational sponsorship},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/dinkelackergarg.pdf},
	author = {Dinkelacker, J. and Garg, P.K.}
}
