@conference {1305,
	title = {Visualizing collaboration and influence in the open-source software community},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 8th working conference on Mining software repositories - MSR {\textquoteright}11},
	year = {2011},
	note = {"This data set includes the complete social graph of 500,000 follow links as well as over 1,000,000 commits and 50,000 users."

"...a large fraction of [GitHub] users provide a location in their profile, which we can turn into geographic coordinates using a geocoding API like PlaceFinder...

"For each repository, we extract the owner, collaborator, and contributor usernames, plus branch names. New user- names help to find new repositories, while branch names are used to fetch commit metadata. Using this method, the crawler uncovered 40,860 code repositories, representing 33,388 unique project names and 1,219,872 individual commits."

"In addition to crawled data, we use the complete GitHub user follower graph from Jan 19, 2011. This graph includes 452,248 links connecting 106,247 unique users, 47\% (49,500) of which could be geocoded with the PlaceFinder API"},
	month = {05/2011},
	pages = {223-226},
	publisher = {ACM Press},
	organization = {ACM Press},
	address = {New York, New York, USA},
	abstract = {We apply visualization techniques to user profiles and repository metadata from the GitHub source code hosting service. Our motivation is to identify patterns within this development community that might otherwise remain obscured. Such patterns include the effect of geographic distance on developer relationships, social connectivity and influence among cities, and variation in project-specific contribution styles (e.g., centralized vs. distributed). Our analysis examines directed graphs in which nodes represent users{\textquoteright} geographic locations and edges represent (a) follower relationships, (b) successive commits, or (c) contributions to the same project. We inspect this data using a set of visualization techniques: geo-scatter maps, small multiple displays, and matrix diagrams. Using these representations, and tools based on them, we develop hypotheses about the larger GitHub community that would be difficult to discern using traditional lists, tables, or descriptive statistics. These methods are not intended to provide conclusive answers; instead, they provide a way for researchers to explore the question space and communicate initial insights.},
	keywords = {COLLABORATION, data exploration, geography, geoscatter, github, graph, mapping, metadata, open source, social graph, user profiles, visualization},
	isbn = {9781450305747},
	doi = {10.1145/1985441.1985476},
	url = {http://vis.stanford.edu/files/2011-GotHub-MSR.pdf},
	author = {Marschner, Eli and Rosenfeld, Evan and Heer, Jeffrey and Heller, Brandon}
}
@article {GonzalezBarahona2008356,
	title = {Geographic origin of libre software developers},
	journal = {Information Economics and Policy},
	volume = {20},
	number = {4},
	year = {2008},
	note = {Empirical Issues in Open Source Software},
	pages = {356 - 363},
	abstract = {This paper examines the claim that libre (free, open source) software involves global development. The anecdotal evidence is that developers usually work in teams including individuals residing in many different geographical areas, time zones and even continents and that, as a whole, the libre software community is also diverse in terms of national origin. However, its exact composition is difficult to capture, since there are few records of the geographical location of developers. Past studies have been based on surveying a limited (and sometimes biased) sample and extrapolating that sample to the global distribution of developers. In this paper we present an alternate approach in which databases are analyzed to create traces of information from which the geographical origin of developers can be inferred. Applying this technique to the SourceForge users database and the mailing lists archives from several large projects, we have estimated the geographical origin of more than one million individuals who are closely related to the libre software development process. The paper concludes that the result is a good proxy for the actual distribution of libre software developers working on global projects.},
	keywords = {developers, email, email address, email archives, geography, mailing list, open source software, sourceforge, timezone, users},
	issn = {0167-6245},
	doi = {DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.07.001},
	url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V8J-4T3DCPK-1/2/3981dfbc523eae1d1ce65fb1f0c0edb7},
	author = {Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona and Gregorio Robles and Roberto Andradas-Izquierdo and Rishab Aiyer Ghosh}
}
@conference {Robles:2006:GLD:1137983.1138017,
	title = {Geographic location of developers at SourceForge},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Mining software repositories},
	series = {MSR {\textquoteright}06},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {144{\textendash}150},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {The development of libre (free/open source) software is usually performed by geographically distributed teams. Participation in most cases is voluntary, sometimes sporadic, and often not framed by a pre-defined management structure. This means that anybody can contribute, and in principle no national origin has advantages over others, except for the differences in availability and quality of Internet connections and language. However, differences in participation across regions do exist, although there are little studies about them. In this paper we present some data which can be the basis for some of those studies. We have taken the database of users registered at SourceForge, the largest libre software development web-based platform, and have inferred their geographical locations. For this, we have applied several techniques and heuristics on the available data (mainly e-mail addresses and time zones), which are presented and discussed in detail. The results show a snapshot of the regional distribution of SourceForge users, which may be a good proxy of the actual distribution of libre software developers. In addition, the methodology may be of interest for similar studies in other domains, when the available data is similar (as is the case of mailing lists related to software projects).},
	keywords = {distributed, email, email address, free software, geographical location, geography, libre software, mining software repositories, open source software, sourceforge, timezone},
	isbn = {1-59593-397-2},
	doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1137983.1138017},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1137983.1138017},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/144GeographicLocation.pdf},
	author = {Gregorio Robles and Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona}
}
@article {54,
	title = {Code, Culture and Cash: The Fading Altruism of Open Source Development},
	journal = {First Monday},
	volume = {6},
	number = {12},
	year = {2001},
	note = {"I collected information on the country of residence for key contributors to the two projects. In the case of Linux, I relied on information located in the CREDITS file of all major kernel releases (from version 1.0 to version 2.4.9) [22]. For Gnome, I gathered developer-contact information from the project{\textquoteright}s web-site. Where information on the home-country of developers was not explicitly available, I performed private research to ascertain said information, or - in the last-case scenario - trusted information in the provided e-mail address of developers to infer home-country from domain ownership [23]. In the case of Linux, to avoid bias that might be introduced over time as developers migrated internationally, developers are continually counted as residents of the countries they were associated with when their names first entered the CREDITS file"},
	abstract = {The nexus of open source development appears to have shifted to Europe over the last ten years. This paper explains why this trend undermines cultural arguments about "hacker ethics" and "post-scarcity" gift economies. It suggests that classical economic theory offers a more succinct explanation for the peculiar international distribution of open source development: hacking rises and falls inversely to its opportunity cost. This finding throws doubt on the Schumpeterian assumption that the efficiency of industrial systems can be measured without reference to the social institutions that bind them.},
	keywords = {credits, email address, european, geography, gnome, linux},
	url = {http://131.193.153.231/www/issues/issue6_12/lancashire/index.html},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/Lancashire.pdf},
	author = {David Lancashire}
}
