@proceedings {1277,
	title = {Knowledge Homogeneity and Specialization in the Apache HTTP Server Project},
	year = {2011},
	note = {"Our data set consists of the commit history and email archives for the Apache HTTP Server Project, spanning sixteen years (2/27/1995 - 1/31/2011)"

"we 1) mapped the committers to email records, 2) cleaned the email records to remove extraneous information, 3) identified topics of discussion in the resulting messages, and 4) constructed a social network model from committers and topics."

"If specialization exists within the httpd community, we should see distinct communities develop around topics. In addition, unique groups of developers should congregate around specialized subtopics. We examined the data from both angles: topical affinity and topic communities."
},
	month = {10/2011},
	pages = {106-122},
	publisher = {Springer},
	abstract = {We present an analysis of developer communication in the Apache HTTP Server project. Using topic modeling techniques we expose latent conceptual sub-communities arising from developer specialization within the greater developer population. However, we found that among the major contributors to the project, very little specialization exists. We present theories to explain this phenomenon, and suggest further research.},
	keywords = {apache, commits, developer, email, email archive, LDA, mailing list, revision control, revision history, scm, social network analysis, specialization, subversion, svn},
	url = {http://sequoia.cs.byu.edu/lab/files/pubs/MacLean2011a.pdf},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/MacLean2011a.pdf},
	author = {MacLean, Alexander C. and Pratt, Landon J. and Knutson, Charles D. and Ringger, Eric K.}
}
@conference {1013,
	title = {Impact of the Creation of the Mozilla Foundation in the Activity of Developers},
	booktitle = {Fourth International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories (MSR{\textquoteright}07:ICSE Workshops 2007)},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {28 - 28},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	organization = {IEEE},
	address = {Minneapolis, MN, USA},
	abstract = {During 2003, the Mozilla project transitioned from company-promoted (sponsored by AOL) to community-promoted (sponsored by the Mozilla Foundation). What happened to the group of developers during this transition? There was any significant impact on its activity or composition? To answer these questions, we have performed an analysis of the CVS repository of Mozilla, using the CVSAnalY tool, finding little on activity, but dramatic changes in the the composition of the development team.},
	keywords = {cvs, cvsanaly, developers, mining challenge, mozilla, msr challenge, revision history},
	isbn = {0-7695-2950-X},
	doi = {10.1109/MSR.2007.15},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/28300028.pdf},
	author = {Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona and Gregorio Robles and Herraiz, Israel}
}
@conference {1004,
	title = {Release Pattern Discovery via Partitioning: Methodology and Case Study},
	booktitle = {Fourth International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories (MSR{\textquoteright}07:ICSE Workshops 2007)},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {19 - 19},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	organization = {IEEE},
	address = {Minneapolis, MN, USA},
	abstract = {The development of Open Source systems produces a variety of software artifacts such as source code, version control records, bug reports, and email discussions. Since the development is distributed across different tool environments and developer practices, any analysis of project behavior must be inferred from whatever common artifacts happen to be available. In this paper, we propose an approach to characterizing a project{\textquoteright}s behavior around the time of major and minor releases; we do this by partitioning the observed activities, such as artifact check-ins, around the dates of major and minor releases, and then look for recognizable patterns. We validate this approach by means of a case study on the MySQL database system; in this case study, we found patterns which suggested MySQL was behaving consistently within itself. These patterns included testing and documenting that took place more before a release than after and that the rate of source code changes dipped around release time.},
	keywords = {bitkeeper, bt2csv, cvs, evolution, mysql, releases, revision history, scm, softchange, version control},
	isbn = {0-7695-2950-X},
	doi = {10.1109/MSR.2007.28},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/28300019.pdf},
	author = {Hindle, Abram and Godfrey, Michael W. and Holt, Richard C.}
}
@conference {German:2006:SCP:1137983.1138022,
	title = {A study of the contributors of PostgreSQL},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Mining software repositories},
	series = {MSR {\textquoteright}06},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {163{\textendash}164},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {This report describes some characteristics of the development team of PostgreSQL that were uncovered by analyzing the history of its software artifacts as recorded by the project{\textquoteright}s CVS repository.},
	keywords = {contributions, contributors, cvs, developers, mining challenge, mining software repositories, msr challenge, patches, postgresql, revision history, roles, software evolution, source code, team},
	isbn = {1-59593-397-2},
	doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1137983.1138022},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1137983.1138022},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/163AStudyOf.pdf},
	author = {Daniel M. German}
}
@article {flosswp26,
	title = {A Case Study of Open Source Software Development: The Apache Server},
	journal = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2000)},
	year = {2000},
	note = {We used the following archival sources of data:
Developer email list (EMAIL).
Concurrent Version Control archive (CVS).
Problem reporting database (BUGDB).},
	month = {June},
	abstract = {According to its proponents, open source style software development has the capacity to compete successfully, and perhaps in many cases displace, traditional commercial development methods. We examine the development process of a major open source application, the Apache web server. By using email archives of source code change history and problem reports we quantify aspects of developer participation, core team size, code ownership, productivity, defect density, and problem resolution interval for this OSS project. This analysis reveals a unique process, which performs well on important measures.},
	keywords = {apache, bug fix revisions, bugs, core, cvs, defect density, developers, email archives, participation, productivity, revision control, revision history, roles, scm, source code, team size},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/mockusapache.pdf},
	author = {Audris Mockus and Roy Fielding and Herbsleb, James}
}
