@proceedings {1713,
	title = {Gender and Tenure Diversity in GitHub Teams},
	year = {2015},
	abstract = {Software development is usually a collaborative venture.
Open Source Software (OSS) projects are no exception; indeed,
by design, the OSS approach can accommodate teams
that are more open, geographically distributed, and dynamic
than commercial teams. This, we find, leads to OSS teams
that are quite diverse. Team diversity, predominantly in of-
fline groups, is known to correlate with team output, mostly
with positive effects. How about in OSS?
Using GITHUB, the largest publicly available collection of
OSS projects, we studied how gender and tenure diversity
relate to team productivity and turnover. Using regression
modeling of GITHUB data and the results of a survey, we
show that both gender and tenure diversity are positive and
significant predictors of productivity, together explaining a
sizable fraction of the data variability. These results can
inform decision making on all levels, leading to better outcomes
in recruiting and performance.},
	keywords = {gender, github, team},
	url = {http://bvasiles.github.io/papers/chi15.pdf},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/chi15.pdf},
	author = {Vasilescu, Bogdan and Posnett, Daryl and Ray, Baishakhi and van den Brand, Mark G.J. and Serebrenik, Alexander and Devanbu, Premkumar and Filkov, Vladimir}
}
@article {Giuri2008305,
	title = {Explaining leadership in virtual teams: The case of open source software},
	journal = {Information Economics and Policy},
	volume = {20},
	number = {4},
	year = {2008},
	note = {Empirical Issues in Open Source Software},
	pages = {305 - 315},
	abstract = {This paper contributes to the open source software (OSS) literature by investigating the likelihood that a participant becomes a project leader. Project leaders are key actors in a virtual community and are crucial to the success of the OSS model. Knowledge of the forces that lead to the emergence of project managers among the multitude of participants is still limited. We aim to fill this gap in the literature by analyzing the association between the roles played by an individual who is registered with a project, and a set of individual-level and project-level characteristics. In line with the theory of occupational choice elaborated by (Lazear, E.P., 2002. Entrepreneurship. NBER Working Paper No. 9109, Cambridge, Mass; Lazear, E.P., 2004. Balanced skills and entrepreneurship, American Economic Review 94, pp. 208-211), we find that OSS project leaders possess diversified skill sets which are needed to select the inputs provided by various participants, motivate contributors, and coordinate their efforts. Specialists, like pure developers, are endowed with more focused skill sets. Moreover, we find that the degree of modularity of the development process is positively associated with the presence of project leaders. That result is consistent with the modern theory of modular production (Baldwin, C.Y., Clark, K.B., 1997. Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Business Review September-October. pp. 84-93; Mateos-Garcia, J., Steinmueller, W.E., 2003. The Open Source Way of Working: A New Paradigm for the Division of Labour in Software Development? SPRU - Science and Technology Policy Studies. Open Source Movement Research INK Working Paper, No. 1; Aoki, M., 2004. An organizational architecture of T-form: Silicon Valley clustering and its institutional coherence. Industrial and Corporate Change 13, pp. 967-981).},
	keywords = {contributors, Human capital, leadership, roles, sourceforge, team},
	issn = {0167-6245},
	doi = {DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.06.002},
	url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V8J-4SRW10C-1/2/5ce36096ba3947338962268b54a5a7a9},
	author = {Paola Giuri and Francesco Rullani and Salvatore Torrisi}
}
@conference {995,
	title = {Open Borders? Immigration in Open Source Projects},
	booktitle = {Fourth International Workshop on Mining Software RepositoriesFourth International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories (MSR{\textquoteright}07:ICSE Workshops 2007)},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {6 - 6},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	organization = {IEEE},
	address = {Minneapolis, MN, USA},
	abstract = {Open source software is built by teams of volunteers. Each project has a core team of developers, who have the authority to commit changes to the repository; this team is the elite, committed foundation of the project, selected through a meritocratic process from a larger number of people who participate on the mailing list. Most projects carefully regulate admission of outsiders to full developer privileges; some projects even have formal descriptions of this process. Understanding the factors that influence the "who, how and when" of this process is critical, both for the sustainability of FLOSS projects, and for outside stakeholders who want to gain entry and succeed. In this paper we mount a quantitative case study of the process by which people join FLOSS projects, using data mined from the Apache web server, Postgres, and Python. We develop a theory of open source project joining, and evaluate this theory based on our data.},
	keywords = {apache, core, joining, postgresql, python, team},
	isbn = {0-7695-2950-X},
	doi = {10.1109/MSR.2007.23},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/28300006.pdf},
	author = {Christian Bird and Gourley, Alex and Devanbu, Prem and Swaminathan, Anand and Hsu, Greta}
}
@article {90,
	title = {Core and periphery in Free/Libre and Open Source software team communications},
	journal = {Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences-Volume 06},
	year = {2006},
	abstract = {The concept of the core group of developers is important and often discussed in empirical studies of FLOSS projects. This paper examines the question, "how does one empirically distinguish the core?" Being able to identify the core members of a FLOSS development project is important because many of the processes necessary for successful projects likely involve core members differently than peripheral members, so analyses that mix the two groups will likely yield invalid results. 

We compare 3 analysis approaches to identify the core: the named list of developers, a Bradford{\textquoteright}s law analysis that takes as the core the most frequent contributors and a social network analysis of the interaction pattern that identifies the core in a core-and-periphery structure. We apply these measures to the interactions around bug fixing for 116 SourceForge projects. The 3 techniques identify different individuals as core members; examination of which individuals are identified leads to suggestions for refining the measures. All 3 measures though suggest that the core of FLOSS projects is a small fraction of the total number of contributors.},
	keywords = {bug fixing, contributions, contributors, core, developers, social network analysis, sourceforge, team},
	author = {Kevin Crowston and Kangning Wei and Li, Qing and Howison, James}
}
@conference {Voinea:2006:MSR:1137983.1138024,
	title = {Mining software repositories with CVSgrab},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Mining software repositories},
	series = {MSR {\textquoteright}06},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {167{\textendash}168},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	keywords = {argouml, cvs, cvsgrab, evolution, mining challenge, msr challenge, postgresql, software visualization, source code, team, visualization},
	isbn = {1-59593-397-2},
	doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1137983.1138024},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1137983.1138024},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/167MiningSoftware.pdf},
	author = {Voinea, Lucian and Telea, Alexandru}
}
@conference {German:2006:SCP:1137983.1138022,
	title = {A study of the contributors of PostgreSQL},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Mining software repositories},
	series = {MSR {\textquoteright}06},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {163{\textendash}164},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {This report describes some characteristics of the development team of PostgreSQL that were uncovered by analyzing the history of its software artifacts as recorded by the project{\textquoteright}s CVS repository.},
	keywords = {contributions, contributors, cvs, developers, mining challenge, mining software repositories, msr challenge, patches, postgresql, revision history, roles, software evolution, source code, team},
	isbn = {1-59593-397-2},
	doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1137983.1138022},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1137983.1138022},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/163AStudyOf.pdf},
	author = {Daniel M. German}
}
@article {springerlink:10.1007/s10606-005-9000-1,
	title = {Socialization in an Open Source Software Community: A Socio-Technical Analysis},
	journal = {Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)},
	volume = {14},
	year = {2005},
	note = {"I present the results of my analyses of participation patterns in a particular OSS project, used as a case study: Python. More precisely, I use the Open Source Project Browser to qualitatively track and analyze the trajectories of several project members who evolved (or not) into full-fledged participants. This allows me to later discuss how socialization proceeds in an OSS community such as Python"

"Over the course of 2002, I progressively retrieved the entire email archive of python-dev (the developers{\textquoteright} mailing list) and the CVS source tree for the project. "

"I read the entirety of the messages written by these participants and also looked at the software code they produced. There were striking similarities between their progressions over time, which I will de- scribe shortly. Overall the trajectory of these participants reflects successful socialization in Python: an evolution from newcomer to developer."

http://www2.parc.com/csl/members/nicolas/documents/JCSCW-OSS.pdf},
	pages = {323-368},
	publisher = {Springer Netherlands},
	abstract = {Open Source Software (OSS) development is often characterized as a fundamentally new way to develop software. Past analyses and discussions, however, have treated OSS projects and their organization mostly as a static phenomenon. Consequently, we do not know how these communities of software developers are sustained and reproduced over time through the progressive integration of new members. To shed light on this issue I report on my analyses of socialization in a particular OSS community. In particular, I document the relationships OSS newcomers develop over time with both the social and material aspects of a project. To do so, I combine two mutually informing activities: ethnography and the use of software specially designed to visualize and explore the interacting networks of human and material resources incorporated in the email and code databases of OSS. Socialization in this community is analyzed from two perspectives: as an individual learning process and as a political process. From these analyses it appears that successful participants progressively construct identities as software craftsmen, and that this process is punctuated by specific rites of passage. Successful participants also understand the political nature of software development and progressively enroll a network of human and material allies to support their efforts. I conclude by discussing how these results could inform the design of software to support socialization in OSS projects, as well as practical implications for the future of these projects.},
	keywords = {cvs, developers, email, email archive, mailing list, open source project browser, participation, python, scm, source code, team, tools},
	issn = {0925-9724},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-005-9000-1},
	author = {DUCHENEAUT, NICOLAS}
}
@conference {flosswp180,
	title = {Towards a Portfolio of FLOSS project Success Measures},
	booktitle = {Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering, International Conference on Software Engineering},
	year = {2004},
	month = {May},
	abstract = {Project success is one of the most widely used dependent variables in information systems research. However, conventional measures of project success are difficult to apply to Free/Libre Open Source Software projects. In this paper, we present an analysis of four measures of success applied to SourceForge projects: number of members of the extended development community, project activity, bug fixing time and number of downloads. We argue that these four measures provide different insights into the collaboration and control mechanisms of the projects.},
	keywords = {bug fixing, developers, downloads, project success, sourceforge, team, team size},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/crowston04towards.pdf},
	author = {Kevin Crowston and Hala Annabi and Howison, James and Chengetai Masango}
}
@proceedings {140,
	title = {An exploratory study of ideology and trust in open source development groups},
	year = {2001},
	note = {"To do this, we scanned information in the public domain to develop a preliminary understanding of the context. We then identified 48 OS projects using www.sourceforge.net, an on-line open source meeting place that provides information on open source efforts and hosts code repositories. Projects were selected to represent a variety of types of software, licenses, and group sizes. We contacted administrators or project leaders and asked them to complete open-ended questionnaires regarding their experience and views on open source development."},
	abstract = {Open source (OS) software development has been the subject of heightened interest among organizational scholars because of the novel social coordination practices that signal a departure from traditional proprietary software development. We propose that trust among group members in open source development groups (OSDGs) plays a key role in facilitating their success. Trust is important in this context because of the risk of opportunistic behavior by other members who volunteers may not have met and may never expect to meet, as well as a lack of explicit market contracts or common organizational affiliation. The open source community is differentiated by a coherent ideology that emphasizes a distinct set of interrelated norms, beliefs, and values. These serve to create incentives for open source practices that eschew conventional transactional norms in favor of a gift culture and a focus on reputations. In this study, we primarily examine the role of the shared ideology in enabling the development of affective and cognitive trust in OSDGs. We further examine how this trust leads to desired outcomes - group efficacy and effectiveness. The study is based on exploratory interviews, examination of archival records and a preliminary survey to understand the specific conditions of open source efforts on which this work-in-progress report is based. This is being followed-up by empirical testing of our research model through a survey of a broad variety of OSDGs. This study would contribute to a clarification of the role of trust in enabling software groups to work effectively and help to understand the bases of trust in ideology-permeated groups.},
	keywords = {contributors, groups, ideology, license analysis, licenses, metadata, open source, sourceforge, Survey, team, team size, teams, trust, types},
	doi = {10.1.1.104.638},
	url = {http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.104.638\&rep=rep1\&type=pdf},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/stewartGosain2001.pdf},
	author = {Katherine Stewart and Gosain, S.}
}
