@conference {Holmes:2008:NGE:1370750.1370787,
	title = {A newbie{\textquoteright}s guide to eclipse APIs},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2008 international working conference on Mining software repositories},
	series = {MSR {\textquoteright}08},
	year = {2008},
	pages = {149{\textendash}152},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {Eclipse has evolved from a fledgling Java IDE into a mature software ecosystem. One of the greatest benefits Eclipse provides developers is flexibility; however, this is not without cost. New Eclipse developers often find the framework to be large and confusing. Determining which parts of the framework they should be using can be a difficult task as Eclipse documentation tends to be either very high-level, focusing on the design of the framework, or low-level, focusing on specific APIs. We have developed a tool called PopCon that provides a bridge between high-level design documentation and low-level API documentation by statically analyzing a framework and several of its clients and providing a ranked list of the relative popularity of its APIs. We have applied PopCon to the Eclipse framework for this challenge to help newbie Eclipse developers identify some of the most relevant APIs for their tasks.},
	keywords = {API popularity, documentation, eclipse, mining software repositories, module, msr challenge, PopCon, popularity},
	isbn = {978-1-60558-024-1},
	doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1370750.1370787},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1370750.1370787},
	author = {Holmes, Reid and Walker, Robert J.}
}
@conference {731,
	title = {Evolution of Volunteer Participation in Libre Software Projects: Evidence from Debian},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	note = {"For each release we have retrieved the corresponding sources.gz file (see below) from the Debian archive. From it we have extracted information about the packages and their maintainers...."
},
	pages = {100-107},
	abstract = {Most libre software projects rely on the work of volunteers. Therefore, attracting people who contribute their time and technical skills is of paramount importance, both in technical and economic terms. This reliance on volunteers leads to some fundamental management challenges: volunteer contributions are inherently difficult to predict, plan and manage, especially in the case of large projects. In this paper we analyze the evolution in time of the human resources of one of the largest and most complex libre software projects composed primarily of volunteers, the Debian project. Debian currently has around 1300 volunteers working on several tasks: much activity is focused on packaging software applications and libraries, but there is also major work related to the maintenance of the infrastructure needed to sustain the development. We have performed a quantitative investigation of data from almost seven years, studying how volunteer involvement has affected the software...},
	keywords = {contributors, debian, maintainers, PopCon, popularity, Volunteers},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/857},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/robles_barahona_michlmayr-evolution_participation.pdf},
	author = {Gregorio Robles and Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona and Martin Michlmayr}
}
