@conference {Gobeille:2008:FP:1370750.1370763,
	title = {The FOSSology project},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2008 international working conference on Mining software repositories},
	series = {MSR {\textquoteright}08},
	year = {2008},
	month = {05/2008},
	pages = {47{\textendash}50},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {By its nature, the availability of FOSS has given computer scientists a large body of software and software projects to analyze. By having available source, version control system metadata, and open project communities, much can be learned about a software project, software development and collaborative project development. The goal of the FOSSology project is to create a public, open source software repository, together with tools to facilitate analysis, storage, and sharing of open source software and its metadata. FOSSology does license detection today.},
	keywords = {abiword, fossology, license analysis, licenses},
	isbn = {978-1-60558-024-1},
	doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1370750.1370763},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1370750.1370763},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/p47-gobeille.pdf},
	author = {Gobeille, Robert}
}
@article {springerlink:10.1007/s10368-007-0086-4,
	title = {Open source software: Motivation and restrictive licensing},
	journal = {International Economics and Economic Policy},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2007},
	note = {"We employ a unique data set consisting of 71 open source projects hosted at the SourceForge web site. The 71 projects in the sample were chosen (in January 2000)"
"This sample was observed over an 18-month period from January 2002 through the middle of 2003, with data collected at 2-month intervals."
"We are grateful to NERA for providing us with the data."
"Although we only have data on a relatively small sample of the projects hosted SourceForge, the sample is unique because of data on lines of code as well as data on different versions of the program. The latter is a potentially important control variable, since a change in version may necessitate additional lines of code.
Our data set contains information on the size of the open source projects in the form of source lines of code (SLOC). Using SLOC as a performance measure is not always ideal; nevertheless, this performance measure is employed in the profession and the literature.15 For our purposes, SLOC is in fact an ideal measure, because we want to measure the effort that is put into the project, rather than whether a project succeeds."
},
	pages = {209-225},
	publisher = {Springer Berlin / Heidelberg},
	abstract = {Open source software (OSS) is an economic paradox. Development of open source software is often done by unpaid volunteers and the source code is typically freely available. Surveys suggest that status, signaling, and intrinsic motivations play an important role in inducing developers to invest effort. Contribution to an OSS project is rewarded by adding one{\textquoteright}s name to the list of contributors which is publicly observable. Such incentives imply that programmers may have little incentive to contribute beyond the threshold level required for being listed as a contributor. Using a unique data set we empirically examine this hypothesis. We find that the output per contributor in open source projects is much higher when licenses are less restrictive and more commercially oriented. These results indeed suggest a status, signaling, or intrinsic motivation for participation in OSS projects with restrictive licenses.},
	keywords = {contributions, contributors, developers, incentives, license analysis, licenses, lines of code, loc, MOTIVATION, restrictive, scm, size, status, version history},
	issn = {1612-4804},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10368-007-0086-4},
	author = {Fershtman, Chaim and Gandal, Neil}
}
@conference {706,
	title = {Retrieving Open Source Software Licenses},
	booktitle = {OSS2006: Open Source Systems (IFIP 2.13)},
	series = {IFIP International Federation for Information Processing},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {35 - 46},
	publisher = {Springer},
	organization = {Springer},
	abstract = {Open Source Software maintenance and reuse require identifying and comprehending the applied software licenses. This paper first characterizes software maintenance, and open source software (OSS) reuse which are particularly relevant in this context. The information needs of maintainers and reusers can be supported by reverse engineering tools at different information retrieval levels. The paper presents an automated license retrieval approach called ASLA. User needs, system architecture, tool features, and tool evaluation are presented. The implemented tool features support identifying source file dependencies and licenses in source files, and adding new license templates for identifying licenses. The tool is evaluated against another tool for license information extraction. ASLA requires the source code as available input but is otherwise not limited to OSS. It supports the same programming languages as GCC. License identification coverage is good and the tool is extendable.
},
	keywords = {gaim, license, license analysis, maintenance, mozilla, reuse},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34226-5_4},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/Retrieving\%20Open\%20Source\%20Software\%20Licenses.pdf},
	author = {Tuunanen, Timo and Koskinen, Jussi and K{\"a}rkk{\"a}inen, Tommi}
}
@conference {Stewart:2005:PAI:1042438.1043100,
	title = {A Preliminary Analysis of the Influences of Licensing and Organizational Sponsorship on Success in Open Source Projects},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - Volume 07},
	series = {HICSS {\textquoteright}05},
	year = {2005},
	note = {"Publicly available data on open source projects registered on the Freshmeat website (www.freshmeat.net) was used to test the hypotheses. Data was collected from each project{\textquoteright}s Freshmeat website at the start and end of an eight month period (March - December 2002)."
"We first selected three project categories from which to draw our sample. These were utilities, software development, and games."
"Within these categories we further differentiated between new projects, which had been registered on the site within the two weeks prior to our first data collection point and older projects that had been registered more than two weeks prior to our initial data collection."
},
	month = {2005},
	pages = {1-10},
	publisher = {IEEE Computer Society},
	organization = {IEEE Computer Society},
	address = {Washington, DC, USA},
	abstract = {This paper develops and tests a model of the impact of	licensing restrictiveness	and	organizational sponsorship on the popularity and vitality of open source software (OSS) development projects. Using data gathered from Freshmeat.net and OSS project home pages the main conclusions derived from the analysis are that organizational sponsorship has a positive effect on project popularity by easing user concerns about cost and quality and that license restrictiveness may have a negative effect on popularity by reducing the perceived utility of open source software. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed, and the paper outlines several avenues for future research.},
	keywords = {contributors, developers, freshmeat, license analysis, licensing, metadata, popularity, restrictive, users},
	isbn = {0-7695-2268-8-7},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2005.38},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2005.38},
	author = {Stewart, Katherine J. and Ammeter, Anthony P. and Maruping, Likoebe M.}
}
@conference {stewart2002an-explorat,
	title = {An Exploratory Study of Factors Influencing the Level of Vitality and Popularity of Open Source Projects},
	booktitle = {ICIS 2002. Proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems 2002},
	year = {2002},
	note = {"We are currently tracking publicly available data on 240 open source projects registered on the freshmeat Website." "First, we randomly selected a total of 120 projects from the utilities, software development, and games and entertainment areas. We then selected 120 projects from these forums that had been registered on the site during the two weeks prior to the start of our data collection effort."},
	month = {2002},
	pages = {1-5},
	abstract = {In this research, we ask the question: What differentiates successful from unsuccessful open source software projects? Using a sample of 240 open source projects, we examine how organizational sponsorship, target audience (developer versus end user), license choice, and development status interact over time to influence the extent to which open source software projects attract user attention and developer activity.},
	keywords = {activity, audience, developers, freshmeat, license analysis, licenses, organizational sponsorship, project success, roles, status, target audience, users},
	author = {Stewart, Katherine J. and Ammeter, Tony}
}
@proceedings {140,
	title = {An exploratory study of ideology and trust in open source development groups},
	year = {2001},
	note = {"To do this, we scanned information in the public domain to develop a preliminary understanding of the context. We then identified 48 OS projects using www.sourceforge.net, an on-line open source meeting place that provides information on open source efforts and hosts code repositories. Projects were selected to represent a variety of types of software, licenses, and group sizes. We contacted administrators or project leaders and asked them to complete open-ended questionnaires regarding their experience and views on open source development."},
	abstract = {Open source (OS) software development has been the subject of heightened interest among organizational scholars because of the novel social coordination practices that signal a departure from traditional proprietary software development. We propose that trust among group members in open source development groups (OSDGs) plays a key role in facilitating their success. Trust is important in this context because of the risk of opportunistic behavior by other members who volunteers may not have met and may never expect to meet, as well as a lack of explicit market contracts or common organizational affiliation. The open source community is differentiated by a coherent ideology that emphasizes a distinct set of interrelated norms, beliefs, and values. These serve to create incentives for open source practices that eschew conventional transactional norms in favor of a gift culture and a focus on reputations. In this study, we primarily examine the role of the shared ideology in enabling the development of affective and cognitive trust in OSDGs. We further examine how this trust leads to desired outcomes - group efficacy and effectiveness. The study is based on exploratory interviews, examination of archival records and a preliminary survey to understand the specific conditions of open source efforts on which this work-in-progress report is based. This is being followed-up by empirical testing of our research model through a survey of a broad variety of OSDGs. This study would contribute to a clarification of the role of trust in enabling software groups to work effectively and help to understand the bases of trust in ideology-permeated groups.},
	keywords = {contributors, groups, ideology, license analysis, licenses, metadata, open source, sourceforge, Survey, team, team size, teams, trust, types},
	doi = {10.1.1.104.638},
	url = {http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.104.638\&rep=rep1\&type=pdf},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/stewartGosain2001.pdf},
	author = {Katherine Stewart and Gosain, S.}
}
