@proceedings {1895,
	title = {How are Developers Treating License Inconsistency Issues? A Case Study on License Inconsistency Evolution in FOSS Projects},
	volume = {496},
	year = {2017},
	month = {05/2017},
	pages = {69-79},
	publisher = {Springer},
	abstract = {A license inconsistency is the presence of two or more source files that evolved from the same original file containing different licenses. In our previous study, we have shown that license inconsistencies do exist in open source projects and may lead to potential license violation problems. In this study, we try to find out whether the issues of license inconsistencies are properly solved by analyzing two versions of a FOSS distribution{\textemdash}Debian{\textemdash}and investigate the evolution patterns of license inconsistencies. Findings are: license inconsistencies occur mostly because the original copyright owner updated the license while the reusers were still using the old version of the source files with the old license; most license inconsistencies would disappear when the reusers synchronize their project from the upstream, while some would exist permanently if reusers decide not to synchronize anymore. Legally suspicious cases have not been found yet in those Debian distributions.},
	keywords = {Code clone, debian, License inconsistency, licenses, Software license},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-57735-7_8},
	url = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-57735-7_8},
	author = {Y. Wu and Manabe, Yuki and Daniel M. Germ{\'a}n and Inoue, K.}
}
@conference {965,
	title = {Identifying licensing of jar archives using a code-search approach},
	booktitle = {2010 7th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2010)2010 7th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2010)},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {151 - 160},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	organization = {IEEE},
	address = {Cape Town, South Africa},
	abstract = {Free and open source software strongly promotes the reuse of source code. Some open source Java components/libraries are distributed as jar archives only containing the bytecode and some additional information. For whoever wanting to integrate this jar in her own project, it is important to determine the license(s) of the code from which the jar archive was produced, as this affects the way that such component can be used. This paper proposes an automatic approach to determine the license of jar archives, combining the use of a code-search engine with the automatic classification of licenses contained in textual flies enclosed in the jar. Results of an empirical study performed on 37 jars - from 17 different systems - indicate that this approach is able to successfully infer the jar licenses in over 95\% of the cases, but that in many cases the license in textual flies may differ from the one of the classes contained in the jar.},
	keywords = {apache, bytecode, classification, eclipse, google code, jar, java, licenses, source code},
	isbn = {978-1-4244-6802-7},
	doi = {10.1109/MSR.2010.5463282},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/151msr2010.pdf},
	author = {Di Penta, Massimiliano and Daniel M. German and Antoniol, Giuliano}
}
@article {Subramaniam:2009:DOS:1480545.1480824,
	title = {Determinants of open source software project success: A longitudinal study},
	journal = {Decis. Support Syst.},
	volume = {46},
	year = {2009},
	month = {January},
	pages = {576{\textendash}585},
	publisher = {Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.},
	address = {Amsterdam, The Netherlands, The Netherlands},
	abstract = {In this paper, we investigate open source software (OSS) success using longitudinal data on OSS projects. We find that restrictive OSS licenses have an adverse impact on OSS success. On further analysis, restrictive OSS license is found to be negatively associated with developer interest, but is positively associated with the interest of non-developer users and project administrators. We also show that developer and non-developer interest in the OSS project and the project activity levels in any time period significantly affect the project success measures in subsequent time period. The implications of our findings for OSS research and practice are discussed. },
	keywords = {contributors, developers, licenses, longitudinal study, Open source project, OSS, project success, restrictive, Software project success},
	issn = {0167-9236},
	doi = {10.1016/j.dss.2008.10.005},
	url = {http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1480545.1480824},
	author = {Subramaniam, Chandrasekar and Sen, Ravi and Nelson, Matthew L.}
}
@conference {Gobeille:2008:FP:1370750.1370763,
	title = {The FOSSology project},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2008 international working conference on Mining software repositories},
	series = {MSR {\textquoteright}08},
	year = {2008},
	month = {05/2008},
	pages = {47{\textendash}50},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {By its nature, the availability of FOSS has given computer scientists a large body of software and software projects to analyze. By having available source, version control system metadata, and open project communities, much can be learned about a software project, software development and collaborative project development. The goal of the FOSSology project is to create a public, open source software repository, together with tools to facilitate analysis, storage, and sharing of open source software and its metadata. FOSSology does license detection today.},
	keywords = {abiword, fossology, license analysis, licenses},
	isbn = {978-1-60558-024-1},
	doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1370750.1370763},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1370750.1370763},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/p47-gobeille.pdf},
	author = {Gobeille, Robert}
}
@article {springerlink:10.1007/s10368-007-0086-4,
	title = {Open source software: Motivation and restrictive licensing},
	journal = {International Economics and Economic Policy},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2007},
	note = {"We employ a unique data set consisting of 71 open source projects hosted at the SourceForge web site. The 71 projects in the sample were chosen (in January 2000)"
"This sample was observed over an 18-month period from January 2002 through the middle of 2003, with data collected at 2-month intervals."
"We are grateful to NERA for providing us with the data."
"Although we only have data on a relatively small sample of the projects hosted SourceForge, the sample is unique because of data on lines of code as well as data on different versions of the program. The latter is a potentially important control variable, since a change in version may necessitate additional lines of code.
Our data set contains information on the size of the open source projects in the form of source lines of code (SLOC). Using SLOC as a performance measure is not always ideal; nevertheless, this performance measure is employed in the profession and the literature.15 For our purposes, SLOC is in fact an ideal measure, because we want to measure the effort that is put into the project, rather than whether a project succeeds."
},
	pages = {209-225},
	publisher = {Springer Berlin / Heidelberg},
	abstract = {Open source software (OSS) is an economic paradox. Development of open source software is often done by unpaid volunteers and the source code is typically freely available. Surveys suggest that status, signaling, and intrinsic motivations play an important role in inducing developers to invest effort. Contribution to an OSS project is rewarded by adding one{\textquoteright}s name to the list of contributors which is publicly observable. Such incentives imply that programmers may have little incentive to contribute beyond the threshold level required for being listed as a contributor. Using a unique data set we empirically examine this hypothesis. We find that the output per contributor in open source projects is much higher when licenses are less restrictive and more commercially oriented. These results indeed suggest a status, signaling, or intrinsic motivation for participation in OSS projects with restrictive licenses.},
	keywords = {contributions, contributors, developers, incentives, license analysis, licenses, lines of code, loc, MOTIVATION, restrictive, scm, size, status, version history},
	issn = {1612-4804},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10368-007-0086-4},
	author = {Fershtman, Chaim and Gandal, Neil}
}
@conference {stewart2002an-explorat,
	title = {An Exploratory Study of Factors Influencing the Level of Vitality and Popularity of Open Source Projects},
	booktitle = {ICIS 2002. Proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems 2002},
	year = {2002},
	note = {"We are currently tracking publicly available data on 240 open source projects registered on the freshmeat Website." "First, we randomly selected a total of 120 projects from the utilities, software development, and games and entertainment areas. We then selected 120 projects from these forums that had been registered on the site during the two weeks prior to the start of our data collection effort."},
	month = {2002},
	pages = {1-5},
	abstract = {In this research, we ask the question: What differentiates successful from unsuccessful open source software projects? Using a sample of 240 open source projects, we examine how organizational sponsorship, target audience (developer versus end user), license choice, and development status interact over time to influence the extent to which open source software projects attract user attention and developer activity.},
	keywords = {activity, audience, developers, freshmeat, license analysis, licenses, organizational sponsorship, project success, roles, status, target audience, users},
	author = {Stewart, Katherine J. and Ammeter, Tony}
}
@article {flosswp63,
	title = {The Scope of Open Source Licensing},
	journal = {Journal of Law, Economics and Organization},
	volume = {21},
	number = {1},
	year = {2002},
	month = {2005},
	pages = {20-56},
	abstract = {This paper is an initial exploration of the determinants of open source license choice. It first enumerates the various considerations that should figure into the licensor{\textquoteright}s choice of contractual terms, in particular highlighting how the decision is shaped not just by the preferences of the licensor itself, but also by that of the community of developers. The paper then presents an empirical analysis of the determinants of license choice using the SourceForge database, a compilation of nearly 40,000 open source projects. Projects geared toward end-users tend to have restrictive licenses, while those oriented toward developers are less likely to do so. Projects that are designed to run on commercial operating systems and those geared towards the Internet are less likely to have restrictive licenses. Finally, projects that are likely to be attractive to consumers such as games are more likely to have restrictive licenses.},
	keywords = {developers, license, licenses, permissive, restrictive, sourceforge},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/lernertirole2.pdf},
	author = {Josh Lerner and Jean Tirole}
}
@proceedings {140,
	title = {An exploratory study of ideology and trust in open source development groups},
	year = {2001},
	note = {"To do this, we scanned information in the public domain to develop a preliminary understanding of the context. We then identified 48 OS projects using www.sourceforge.net, an on-line open source meeting place that provides information on open source efforts and hosts code repositories. Projects were selected to represent a variety of types of software, licenses, and group sizes. We contacted administrators or project leaders and asked them to complete open-ended questionnaires regarding their experience and views on open source development."},
	abstract = {Open source (OS) software development has been the subject of heightened interest among organizational scholars because of the novel social coordination practices that signal a departure from traditional proprietary software development. We propose that trust among group members in open source development groups (OSDGs) plays a key role in facilitating their success. Trust is important in this context because of the risk of opportunistic behavior by other members who volunteers may not have met and may never expect to meet, as well as a lack of explicit market contracts or common organizational affiliation. The open source community is differentiated by a coherent ideology that emphasizes a distinct set of interrelated norms, beliefs, and values. These serve to create incentives for open source practices that eschew conventional transactional norms in favor of a gift culture and a focus on reputations. In this study, we primarily examine the role of the shared ideology in enabling the development of affective and cognitive trust in OSDGs. We further examine how this trust leads to desired outcomes - group efficacy and effectiveness. The study is based on exploratory interviews, examination of archival records and a preliminary survey to understand the specific conditions of open source efforts on which this work-in-progress report is based. This is being followed-up by empirical testing of our research model through a survey of a broad variety of OSDGs. This study would contribute to a clarification of the role of trust in enabling software groups to work effectively and help to understand the bases of trust in ideology-permeated groups.},
	keywords = {contributors, groups, ideology, license analysis, licenses, metadata, open source, sourceforge, Survey, team, team size, teams, trust, types},
	doi = {10.1.1.104.638},
	url = {http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.104.638\&rep=rep1\&type=pdf},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/stewartGosain2001.pdf},
	author = {Katherine Stewart and Gosain, S.}
}
