@article {1861,
	title = {The Debsources Dataset: two decades of free and open source software},
	journal = {Empirical Software Engineering},
	year = {2016},
	month = {05/2015},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	abstract = {We present the Debsources Dataset: distribution metadata and source code metrics spanning two decades of Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) history, seen through the lens of the Debian distribution. Debsources is a software platform used to gather, search, and publish on the Web the full source code of the Debian operating system, as well as measures about it. A notable public instance of Debsources is available at http://sources.debian.net, it includes both current and historical releases of Debian. Plugins to compute popular source code metrics (lines of code, defined symbols, disk usage) and other derived data (e.g., Checksums) have been written, integrated, and run on all the source code available on sources.debian.net. The Debsources Dataset is a PostgreSQL database dump of sources.debian.net metadata, as of February 10th, 2015. The dataset contains both Debian-specific metadata -- e.g., which software packages are available in which release, which source code file belong to which package, release dates, etc. -- and source code information gathered by running Debsources plugins. The Debsources Dataset offer a very long-term historical view of the macro-level evolution and constitution of FOSS through the lens of popular, representative FOSS projects of their times.},
	keywords = {debian, metadata, postgresql},
	issn = {1573-7616},
	doi = {10.1007/s10664-016-9461-5},
	url = {https://matthieu.io/dl/papers/debsources-ese-2016.pdf},
	author = {Caneill, Matthieu and Daniel M. Germ{\'a}n and Zacchiroli, Stefano}
}
@conference {1305,
	title = {Visualizing collaboration and influence in the open-source software community},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 8th working conference on Mining software repositories - MSR {\textquoteright}11},
	year = {2011},
	note = {"This data set includes the complete social graph of 500,000 follow links as well as over 1,000,000 commits and 50,000 users."

"...a large fraction of [GitHub] users provide a location in their profile, which we can turn into geographic coordinates using a geocoding API like PlaceFinder...

"For each repository, we extract the owner, collaborator, and contributor usernames, plus branch names. New user- names help to find new repositories, while branch names are used to fetch commit metadata. Using this method, the crawler uncovered 40,860 code repositories, representing 33,388 unique project names and 1,219,872 individual commits."

"In addition to crawled data, we use the complete GitHub user follower graph from Jan 19, 2011. This graph includes 452,248 links connecting 106,247 unique users, 47\% (49,500) of which could be geocoded with the PlaceFinder API"},
	month = {05/2011},
	pages = {223-226},
	publisher = {ACM Press},
	organization = {ACM Press},
	address = {New York, New York, USA},
	abstract = {We apply visualization techniques to user profiles and repository metadata from the GitHub source code hosting service. Our motivation is to identify patterns within this development community that might otherwise remain obscured. Such patterns include the effect of geographic distance on developer relationships, social connectivity and influence among cities, and variation in project-specific contribution styles (e.g., centralized vs. distributed). Our analysis examines directed graphs in which nodes represent users{\textquoteright} geographic locations and edges represent (a) follower relationships, (b) successive commits, or (c) contributions to the same project. We inspect this data using a set of visualization techniques: geo-scatter maps, small multiple displays, and matrix diagrams. Using these representations, and tools based on them, we develop hypotheses about the larger GitHub community that would be difficult to discern using traditional lists, tables, or descriptive statistics. These methods are not intended to provide conclusive answers; instead, they provide a way for researchers to explore the question space and communicate initial insights.},
	keywords = {COLLABORATION, data exploration, geography, geoscatter, github, graph, mapping, metadata, open source, social graph, user profiles, visualization},
	isbn = {9781450305747},
	doi = {10.1145/1985441.1985476},
	url = {http://vis.stanford.edu/files/2011-GotHub-MSR.pdf},
	author = {Marschner, Eli and Rosenfeld, Evan and Heer, Jeffrey and Heller, Brandon}
}
@conference {1223,
	title = {Success and Abandonment in Open Source Commons: Selected Findings from an Empirical Study of Sourceforge.net Projects},
	booktitle = {Second International Workshop on Building Sustainable Open Source Communities (OSCOMM 2010)},
	year = {2010},
	note = {"we utilize data collected from August through October 2006 on 107,747 OSS projects hosted on the open source hosting site Sourceforge.net (SF henceforth). We combined SF project data gathered by the FLOSSmole project (Howison et al., 2006) with other SF data we {\textquotedblleft}crawled{\textquotedblright} ourselves"},
	month = {05/2010},
	abstract = {Some open source software collaborations are sustained over long periods of time and across several versions of a software product, while others become abandoned even before the first version of the product has been developed. In this study, we identify factors that might be responsible for one or the other of these collaborative trajectories. We examine 107,747 open source software projects hosted on Sourceforge.net in August 2006 using data available through the FLOSSmole Project. We employ Classification and Regression Tree modeling and Random Forests statistical approaches to begin to establish an understanding of how various project attributes, especially physical and community ones, contribute to project success or abandonment. We find that factors associated with success and abandonment differ for projects in the early stage of development (pre-first release) compared to projects that have had a first release, and that product utility, project vision, leadership, and group-size are associated with success in open source collaborations. We also find that successful open source projects exist across all types of software and not simply in areas associated with the open source {\textquotedblleft}movement.{\textquotedblright} Other evidence suggests that Sourceforge.net may play an important role in {\textquotedblleft}intellectual match-making.{\textquotedblright}},
	keywords = {abandonment, flossmole, metadata, project failure, project success, sourceforge, time},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/osscomm003.pdf},
	author = {Schweik, C. M. and English, R. and Paienjton, Q. and Haire, S.}
}
@conference {952,
	title = {The Ultimate Debian Database: Consolidating bazaar metadata for Quality Assurance and data mining},
	booktitle = {2010 7th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2010)2010 7th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2010)},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {52 - 61},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	organization = {IEEE},
	address = {Cape Town, South Africa},
	abstract = {FLOSS distributions like RedHat and Ubuntu require a lot more complex infrastructures than most other FLOSS projects. In the case of community-driven distributions like Debian, the development of such an infrastructure is often not very organized, leading to new data sources being added in an impromptu manner while hackers set up new services that gain acceptance in the community. Mixing and matching data is then harder than should be, albeit being badly needed for Quality Assurance and data mining. Massive refactoring and integration is not a viable solution either, due to the constraints imposed by the bazaar development model. This paper presents the Ultimate Debian Database (UDD), which is the countermeasure adopted by the Debian project to the above "data hell". UDD gathers data from various data sources into a single, central SQL database, turning Quality Assurance needs that could not be easily implemented before into simple SQL queries. The paper also discusses the customs that have contributed to the data hell, the lessons learnt while designing UDD, and its applications and potentialities for data mining on FLOSS distributions.},
	keywords = {debian, metadata, udd},
	isbn = {978-1-4244-6802-7},
	doi = {10.1109/MSR.2010.5463277},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/52msr2010-udd.pdf},
	author = {Nussbaum, Lucas and Zacchiroli, Stefano}
}
@article {1118,
	title = {Monetary donations to an open source software platform},
	journal = {Research Policy},
	volume = {38},
	year = {2009},
	month = {03/2009},
	pages = {404 - 414},
	abstract = {Online open source software platforms, such as Sourceforge.net, play a vital role in creating an ecosystem that enables the creation and growth of open source projects. However, there is little research exploring the interactions between open source stakeholders and the platform. We believe that the sustainability of the platform crucially depends on financial incentives. While platforms can obtain these incentives through multiple means, in this paper we focus on one form of financial incentives{\textemdash}voluntary monetary donations by open source community members. We report findings from two empirical studies that examine factors that impact donations. Study 1 investigates the factors that cause some community members to donate and not others. We find that the decision to donate is impacted by relational commitment with open source software platform, donation to projects and accepting donations from others. Study 2 examines what drives the level of donation. We find that the length of association with the platform and relational commitment affects donation levels.},
	keywords = {Collective action, Donation, Identification, incentives, metadata, MOTIVATION, Open source software platform, projects, Reciprocity, Relational commitment, sourceforge},
	issn = {00487333},
	doi = {10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.004},
	author = {Sandeep Krishnamurthy and Tripathi, Arvind K.}
}
@conference {Wermelinger:2008:AEE:1370750.1370783,
	title = {Analyzing the evolution of eclipse plugins},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2008 international working conference on Mining software repositories},
	series = {MSR {\textquoteright}08},
	year = {2008},
	pages = {133{\textendash}136},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {Eclipse is a good example of a modern component-based complex system that is designed for long-term evolution, due to its architecture of reusable and extensible components. This paper presents our preliminary results about the evolution of Eclipse{\textquoteright}s architecture, based on a lightweight and scalable analysis of the metadata in Eclipse{\textquoteright}s sources. We find that the development of Eclipse follows a systematic process: most architectural changes take place in milestones, and maintenance releases only make exceptional changes to component dependencies. We also found a stable architectural core that remains since the first release.},
	keywords = {architectural evolution, cvs, eclipse, metadata, msr challenge, releases, source code},
	isbn = {978-1-60558-024-1},
	doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1370750.1370783},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1370750.1370783},
	author = {Wermelinger, Michel and Yu, Yijun}
}
@conference {624,
	title = {Exploring the Effects of Coordination and Communication Tools on the Efficiency of Open Source Projects using Data Envelopment Analysis},
	booktitle = {OSS2007: Open Source Development, Adoption and Innovation (IFIP 2.13)},
	series = {IFIP International Federation for Information Processing },
	volume = {234/2007},
	year = {2007},
	note = {"based on the date january 8, 2007, we selected the 30 most often downloaded projects from Sourceforge.net"},
	month = {2007///},
	pages = {97 - 108},
	publisher = {Springer},
	organization = {Springer},
	chapter = {8},
	abstract = {In this paper, we propose to explore possible benefits of communication and coordination tools in open source projects using data envelopment analysis (DEA), a general method for efficiency comparisons. DEA offers several advantages: It is a non-parametric optimization method without any need for the user to define any relations between different factors or a production function, can account for economies or diseconwhile omies of scale, and is able to deal with multi-input, multi-output systems in which the factors have different scales. Using a data set of 30 open source project retrieved from SourceForge.net, we demonstrate the application of DEA, showing that the efficiency of the projects is in general relatively high. Regarding the effects of tool employment on the efficiency of projects, the results were surprising: Most of the possible tools, and overall usage, showed a negative relationship to efficiency.
},
	keywords = {metadata, sourceforge},
	issn = {978-0-387-72485-0},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72486-7_8},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/Exploring\%20the\%20Effects\%20Coodination.pdf},
	author = {Koch, Stefan}
}
@article {flosswp405,
	title = {Self-organization of teams for free/libre open source software development},
	journal = {Information and Software Technology Journal},
	volume = {49},
	number = {564-575},
	year = {2007},
	note = {"First, the data from these projects that we needed for analysis had to be publicly available (ruling out projects that limit access to their email lists or trackers). Second, we chose the projects that had more than 7 members"..."projects that have attracted numerous developers beyond the initial project founders, are continuing to release software, have numerous downloads and have an active user community that provides feedback"
"3 FLOSS projects were selected for analysis, namely Gaim, eGroupWare and Compiere ERP."

all had sourceforge hosting

Data: "The primary data used for our study were interactions on the main developer communication forum, either a developer mailing list or web-based discussion forum."

Analysis: "For this project, we inductively content-analyzed developer email interactions to identify the task assignment mechanisms used in the process. We coded each instance of task assignment identified on three dimensions: who assigned the task, to whom, and how"
},
	abstract = {This paper provides empirical evidence about how free/libre open source software development teams self-organize their work. Following a case study methodology, we examined developer interaction data from three active and successful FLOSS projects using qualitative research methods, specifically inductive content analysis, to identify the task-assignment mechanisms used by the participants. We found that "self-assignment" was the most common mechanism across three FLOSS projects. This mechanism is consistent with expectations for distributed and largely volunteer teams. We conclude by discussing whether these emergent practices can be usefully transferred to mainstream practice and indicating directions for future research.},
	keywords = {case study, compiere, coordination, DESIGN, distributed teams, egroupware, email, email archives, forum, free/libre open source software development, gaim, INTERNET, mailing list, metadata, qualitative research methods, self-organizing teams, sourceforge, SYSTEMS, task assignment, WORK},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/task_assignment_final.pdf},
	author = {Kevin Crowston and Li, Qing and Kangning Wei and Eseryel, U. Yeliz and Howison, James}
}
@article {flosswp113,
	title = {The Impact of Ideology on Effectiveness in Open Source Software Development Teams},
	journal = {MIS Quarterly},
	volume = {30},
	number = {2},
	year = {2006},
	note = {"...we collected data related to OSS projects hosted on Sourceforge (www.sourceforge.net)."
"Data was collected using two surveys and from the Sourceforge website."
},
	month = {2006},
	pages = {291-314},
	abstract = {The emerging work on understanding open source software has argued for the importance of understanding what leads to effectiveness in OSS development teams and has pointed to the importance of ideology. This paper develops a framework of the OSS ideology (including specific norms, beliefs, and values) and a theoretical model to show how adherence to components of the ideology impact effectiveness in OSS teams. The model is based on the idea that ideology provides clan control, which is important in OSS development settings because OSS teams generally lack formal behavioral and outcome controls. The paper hypothesizes both direct effects of ideology on OSS team effectiveness and indirect effects via influences on affective trust, cognitive trust, and communication quality. Hypotheses are tested using survey and objective data on OSS projects. Four effectiveness measures are used to capture unique aspects of effectiveness in OSS including both the extent to which a team attracts input from the community and the team{\textquoteright}s success in accomplishing project outcomes. Results support the main thesis that OSS team members{\textquoteright} adherence to the tenets of the OSS community ideology enhances OSS team effectiveness. The study uncovers several differences in the importance of OSS norms, beliefs, and values to different kinds of OSS team effectiveness and discusses implications for theory and practice.},
	keywords = {bug fixing, bug reports, bug tracking, communication, COMMUNITY, effectiveness, feature requests, ideology, metadata, sourceforge, Survey, team effort, team size, trust},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/stewartgosain2.pdf},
	author = {Stewart, K. and Gosain, S.}
}
@conference {693,
	title = {Impact of Social Ties on Open Source Project Team Formation},
	booktitle = {OSS2006: Open Source Systems (IFIP 2.13)},
	series = {IFIP International Federation for Information Processing },
	volume = {203/2006},
	year = {2006},
	note = {"we randomly selected 1030 new projects that were registered between X and X in 2005. A web crawler downloaded the HTML files containing project summary data and developer information on the date of registration."},
	month = {2006///},
	pages = {307 - 317},
	publisher = {Springer},
	organization = {Springer},
	abstract = {In this paper, we empirically examined the role of social ties in OSSD team formation and developer joining behavior. We find that the existence and the amount of prior social relations in the network do increase the probability of an OSS project to attract more developers. Interestingly, for projects without preexisting social ties, developers tend to join the project initiated by people with less OSSD experience. This research fills a gap in the open source literature by conducting an empirical investigation of the role of social relations on project team formation behavior. Furthermore, the adoption of social network analysis, which has received little attention in the OSS literature, can yield some interesting results on the interactions among OSS developers.
},
	keywords = {developers, metadata, social network analysis, sourceforge},
	issn = {978-0-387-34225-2},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34226-5_31},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/Impact\%20of\%20Social\%20Ties\%20on\%20Open\%20Source\%20Project.pdf},
	author = {Hahn, Jungpil and Moon, Jae and Zhang, Chen}
}
@article {1079,
	title = {Are All Open Source Projects Created Equal? Understanding the Sustainability of Open Source Software Development Model},
	journal = {AMCIS 2005 Proceedings},
	number = {435},
	year = {2005},
	note = {uses first 300 most active projects on Sourceforge: {\textquoteright}Our data sample consists of 300 open source software development projects hosted in the Sourceforge.Net. They are the first 300 active projects ranked by Sourceforge.Net....Our dependent variable in the model to measure the success of the projects is the number of downloads. It is an essential variable to show how successful the project is. Generally, more number of downloads means a more successful project. Independent variables include: development status, project lifespan, number of developers, number of messages in the forums, number of mailing list, number of bug report, number of patch report, number of CVS report, number of file releases and also number of news release."},
	abstract = {A very intriguing question in Open Source software (OSS) development is: why there are only a few open source projects succeed, while the majority of projects never do. In this research, we examine the factors that may influence the performance of OSS projects. We particularly focus on the OSS{\textquoteright}s core developers{\textquoteright} role in the project{\textquoteright}s success. Extant research has yet to distinguish core developers and non-core developers from the community at large. The different roles of the core developers and non-core developers in OSS projects{\textquoteright} success still remain unclear. Our research contributes to the literature by separating the core developers from the development forces in general and empirically examining the core developers{\textquoteright} importance. Drawing the evidences from our extensive dataset of 300 open source projects, we demonstrated that core developers{\textquoteright} leadership and project advocation are crucial in determining the fate of the OSS projects. Our research could provide better understanding of OSS sustainability. It could also give practical advice to the OSS community on how to make the project successful.},
	keywords = {contributors, core, developers, downloads, metadata, project success, sourceforge},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/LongYuan.pdf},
	author = {Long, J. and Yuan, M.J.}
}
@conference {Stewart:2005:PAI:1042438.1043100,
	title = {A Preliminary Analysis of the Influences of Licensing and Organizational Sponsorship on Success in Open Source Projects},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - Volume 07},
	series = {HICSS {\textquoteright}05},
	year = {2005},
	note = {"Publicly available data on open source projects registered on the Freshmeat website (www.freshmeat.net) was used to test the hypotheses. Data was collected from each project{\textquoteright}s Freshmeat website at the start and end of an eight month period (March - December 2002)."
"We first selected three project categories from which to draw our sample. These were utilities, software development, and games."
"Within these categories we further differentiated between new projects, which had been registered on the site within the two weeks prior to our first data collection point and older projects that had been registered more than two weeks prior to our initial data collection."
},
	month = {2005},
	pages = {1-10},
	publisher = {IEEE Computer Society},
	organization = {IEEE Computer Society},
	address = {Washington, DC, USA},
	abstract = {This paper develops and tests a model of the impact of	licensing restrictiveness	and	organizational sponsorship on the popularity and vitality of open source software (OSS) development projects. Using data gathered from Freshmeat.net and OSS project home pages the main conclusions derived from the analysis are that organizational sponsorship has a positive effect on project popularity by easing user concerns about cost and quality and that license restrictiveness may have a negative effect on popularity by reducing the perceived utility of open source software. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed, and the paper outlines several avenues for future research.},
	keywords = {contributors, developers, freshmeat, license analysis, licensing, metadata, popularity, restrictive, users},
	isbn = {0-7695-2268-8-7},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2005.38},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2005.38},
	author = {Stewart, Katherine J. and Ammeter, Anthony P. and Maruping, Likoebe M.}
}
@conference {1153,
	title = {Characterizing the OSS process},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2nd ICSE Workshop on Open Source},
	year = {2002},
	note = {"We have considered two well-known Open Source portals (FreshMeat [1] and SourceForge [2] )."
"Using pseudo-random sampling we have selected a sample of 400 projects (mostly from FreshMeat). Each project is described by several variables (programming language, type of license, size of source code, type of documentation available and others). By indirect means (analysis of the Changelog file, or CVS) it is also possible to compute the number of people working on the project, and the number of external contributors. From FreshMeat we get both a vitality index, that considers the number of releases per time period, and a popularity index, which is a first measure of the interest of users to the project (project URL hits, mixed with subscriptions to it)."},
	abstract = {The Open Source model of software development has gained the attention of both the business, the practitioners{\textquoteright} and the research communities. The Open Source process has been described by the seminal paper by Eric Raymond [4] and [5]. However, sound empirical studies are still very limited [3], [6].
Our goal is to investigate the OS process by empirical means, to analyze, characterize it, and possibly model it with quantitative models. It should be noted that the Open Source process provides open process and product data, and therefore is a rare opportunity for empirical research.
Our initial research focus is on the characterization of the process, starting from the evolution of OS projects. In traditional projects, a significant number of releases in a short time is usually considered an instability factor [7] and [8], while in the OSS community, it is an evidence of vitality, shows the commitment of the authors and the power of attraction of other programmers [9]. Is it possible to characterize the vitality of projects? And, can vitality be traced to some other characteristics of a project?},
	keywords = {bugs, change log, classification, cvs, downloads, freshmeat, metadata, patches, popularity, project success, release history, sourceforge, vitality},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/CapiluppiLagoMorisio.pdf},
	author = {Capiluppi, Andrea and Patricia Lago and Maurizio Morisio}
}
@proceedings {140,
	title = {An exploratory study of ideology and trust in open source development groups},
	year = {2001},
	note = {"To do this, we scanned information in the public domain to develop a preliminary understanding of the context. We then identified 48 OS projects using www.sourceforge.net, an on-line open source meeting place that provides information on open source efforts and hosts code repositories. Projects were selected to represent a variety of types of software, licenses, and group sizes. We contacted administrators or project leaders and asked them to complete open-ended questionnaires regarding their experience and views on open source development."},
	abstract = {Open source (OS) software development has been the subject of heightened interest among organizational scholars because of the novel social coordination practices that signal a departure from traditional proprietary software development. We propose that trust among group members in open source development groups (OSDGs) plays a key role in facilitating their success. Trust is important in this context because of the risk of opportunistic behavior by other members who volunteers may not have met and may never expect to meet, as well as a lack of explicit market contracts or common organizational affiliation. The open source community is differentiated by a coherent ideology that emphasizes a distinct set of interrelated norms, beliefs, and values. These serve to create incentives for open source practices that eschew conventional transactional norms in favor of a gift culture and a focus on reputations. In this study, we primarily examine the role of the shared ideology in enabling the development of affective and cognitive trust in OSDGs. We further examine how this trust leads to desired outcomes - group efficacy and effectiveness. The study is based on exploratory interviews, examination of archival records and a preliminary survey to understand the specific conditions of open source efforts on which this work-in-progress report is based. This is being followed-up by empirical testing of our research model through a survey of a broad variety of OSDGs. This study would contribute to a clarification of the role of trust in enabling software groups to work effectively and help to understand the bases of trust in ideology-permeated groups.},
	keywords = {contributors, groups, ideology, license analysis, licenses, metadata, open source, sourceforge, Survey, team, team size, teams, trust, types},
	doi = {10.1.1.104.638},
	url = {http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.104.638\&rep=rep1\&type=pdf},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/stewartGosain2001.pdf},
	author = {Katherine Stewart and Gosain, S.}
}
