@proceedings {1901,
	title = {Adoption of Academic Tools in Open Source Communities: The Debian Case Study},
	volume = {496},
	year = {2017},
	month = {05/2017},
	pages = {139-150},
	publisher = {Springer},
	abstract = {Component repositories play a key role in the open software ecosystem. Managing the evolution of these repositories is a challenging task, and maintainers are confronted with a number of complex issues that need automatic tools to be adressed properly.

In this paper, we present an overview of 10 years of research in this field and the process leading to the adoption of our tools in a FOSS community. We focus on the Debian distribution and in particular we look at the issues arising during the distribution lifecycle: ensuring buildability of source packages, detecting packages that cannot be installed and bootstrapping the distribution on a new architecture. We present three tools, distcheck, buildcheck and botch, that we believe of general interest for other open source component repositories.

The lesson we have learned during this journey may provide useful guidance for researchers willing to see their tools broadly adopted by the community.},
	keywords = {components, debian, distribution},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-57735-7_14},
	url = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-57735-7_14},
	author = {Abate, Pietro and Di Cosmo, Roberto}
}
@proceedings {1895,
	title = {How are Developers Treating License Inconsistency Issues? A Case Study on License Inconsistency Evolution in FOSS Projects},
	volume = {496},
	year = {2017},
	month = {05/2017},
	pages = {69-79},
	publisher = {Springer},
	abstract = {A license inconsistency is the presence of two or more source files that evolved from the same original file containing different licenses. In our previous study, we have shown that license inconsistencies do exist in open source projects and may lead to potential license violation problems. In this study, we try to find out whether the issues of license inconsistencies are properly solved by analyzing two versions of a FOSS distribution{\textemdash}Debian{\textemdash}and investigate the evolution patterns of license inconsistencies. Findings are: license inconsistencies occur mostly because the original copyright owner updated the license while the reusers were still using the old version of the source files with the old license; most license inconsistencies would disappear when the reusers synchronize their project from the upstream, while some would exist permanently if reusers decide not to synchronize anymore. Legally suspicious cases have not been found yet in those Debian distributions.},
	keywords = {Code clone, debian, License inconsistency, licenses, Software license},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-57735-7_8},
	url = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-57735-7_8},
	author = {Y. Wu and Manabe, Yuki and Daniel M. Germ{\'a}n and Inoue, K.}
}
@proceedings {1899,
	title = {Progression and Forecast of a Curated Web-of-Trust: A Study on the Debian Project{\textquoteright}s Cryptographic Keyring},
	volume = {496},
	year = {2017},
	month = {05/2017},
	pages = {117-127},
	publisher = {Springer},
	abstract = {The Debian project is one of the largest free software undertakings worldwide. It is geographically distributed, and participation in the project is done on a voluntary basis, without a single formal employee or directly funded person. As we will explain, due to the nature of the project, its authentication needs are very strict{\textemdash}User/password schemes are way surpassed, and centralized trust management schemes such as PKI are not compatible with its distributed and flat organization; fully decentralized schemes such as the PGP Web of Trust are insuficient by themselves. The Debian project has solved this need by using what we termed a {\textquotedblleft}curated Web of Trust{\textquotedblright}.

We will explain some lessons learned from a massive key migration process that was triggered in 2014. We will present the social insight we have found from examining the relationships expressed as signatures in this curated Web of Trust, some recommendations on personal key-signing policies, and a statistical study and forecast on aging, refreshment and survival of project participants stemming from an analysis on their key-handling.},
	keywords = {cryptography, curated Web of Trust, debian, Keyring, trust management},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-57735-7_12},
	url = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-57735-7_12},
	author = {Gunnar Wolf and V{\'\i}ctor Gonz{\'a}lez Quiroga}
}
@article {1861,
	title = {The Debsources Dataset: two decades of free and open source software},
	journal = {Empirical Software Engineering},
	year = {2016},
	month = {05/2015},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	abstract = {We present the Debsources Dataset: distribution metadata and source code metrics spanning two decades of Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) history, seen through the lens of the Debian distribution. Debsources is a software platform used to gather, search, and publish on the Web the full source code of the Debian operating system, as well as measures about it. A notable public instance of Debsources is available at http://sources.debian.net, it includes both current and historical releases of Debian. Plugins to compute popular source code metrics (lines of code, defined symbols, disk usage) and other derived data (e.g., Checksums) have been written, integrated, and run on all the source code available on sources.debian.net. The Debsources Dataset is a PostgreSQL database dump of sources.debian.net metadata, as of February 10th, 2015. The dataset contains both Debian-specific metadata -- e.g., which software packages are available in which release, which source code file belong to which package, release dates, etc. -- and source code information gathered by running Debsources plugins. The Debsources Dataset offer a very long-term historical view of the macro-level evolution and constitution of FOSS through the lens of popular, representative FOSS projects of their times.},
	keywords = {debian, metadata, postgresql},
	issn = {1573-7616},
	doi = {10.1007/s10664-016-9461-5},
	url = {https://matthieu.io/dl/papers/debsources-ese-2016.pdf},
	author = {Caneill, Matthieu and Daniel M. Germ{\'a}n and Zacchiroli, Stefano}
}
@proceedings {1757,
	title = {The Debsources Dataset: Two Decades of Debian Source Code Metadata},
	year = {2015},
	month = {05/2015},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	abstract = {We present the Debsources Dataset: distribution
metadata and source code metrics spanning two decades of Free
and Open Source Software (FOSS) history, seen through the lens
of the Debian distribution.
Debsources is a software platform used to gather, search, and
publish on the Web the full source code of the Debian operating
system, as well as measures about it. A notable public instance
of Debsources is available at http://sources.debian.net; it includes
both current and historical releases of Debian. Plugins to compute
popular source code metrics (lines of code, defined symbols,
disk usage) and other derived data (e.g., checksums) have been
written, integrated, and run on all the source code available on
sources.debian.net.
The Debsources Dataset is a PostgreSQL database dump
of sources.debian.net metadata, as of February 10th, 2015.
The dataset contains both Debian-specific metadata{\textemdash}e.g., which
software packages are available in which release, which source
code file belong to which package, release dates, etc.{\textemdash}and source
code information gathered by running Debsources plugins.
The Debsources Dataset offer a very long-term historical view
of the macro-level evolution and constitution of FOSS through
the lens of popular, representative FOSS projects of their times.},
	keywords = {debian},
	url = {https://upsilon.cc/~zack/research/publications/debsources-msr-2015.pdf},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/debsources-msr-2015.pdf},
	author = {Zacchiroli, Stefano}
}
@book {1542,
	title = {Authoritative Linked Data Descriptions of Debian Source Packages Using ADMS.SW},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication TechnologyOpen Source Software: Quality Verification},
	volume = {404},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {168 - 181},
	publisher = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	organization = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	address = {Berlin, Heidelberg},
	abstract = {he Debian Package Tracking System is a Web dashboard for Debian contributors and advanced users. This central tool publishes the status of subsequent releases of source packages in the Debian distribution.

It has been improved to generate RDF meta-data documenting the source packages, their releases and links to other packaging artifacts, using the ADMS.SW 1.0 model. This constitutes an authoritative source of machine-readable Debian {\textquotedblleft}facts{\textquotedblright} and proposes a reference URI naming scheme for Linked Data resources about Debian packages.

This should enable the interlinking of these Debian package descriptions with other ADMS.SW or DOAP descriptions of FLOSS projects available on the Semantic Web also using Linked Data principles. This will be particularly interesting for traceability with upstream projects whose releases are packaged in Debian, derivative distributions reusing Debian source packages, or with other FLOSS distributions.},
	keywords = {debian},
	isbn = {978-3-642-38928-3},
	issn = {1868-422X},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-38928-3_12},
	author = {Olivier Berger and Christian Bac},
	editor = {Petrinja, Etiel and Succi, Giancarlo and Ioini, Nabil and Sillitti, Alberto}
}
@conference {955,
	title = {Perspectives on bugs in the Debian bug tracking system},
	booktitle = {2010 7th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2010)2010 7th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2010)},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {86 - 89},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	organization = {IEEE},
	address = {Cape Town, South Africa},
	abstract = {Bugs in Debian differ from regular software bugs. They are usually associated with packages, instead of software modules. They are caused and fixed by source package uploads instead of code commits. The majority are reported by individuals who appear in the bug database once, and only once. There also exists a small group of bug reporters with over 1,000 bug reports each to their name. We also explore our idea that a high bug-frequency for an individual package might be an indicator of popularity instead of poor quality.},
	keywords = {bug reports, debian, msr challenge, popularity},
	isbn = {978-1-4244-6802-7},
	doi = {10.1109/MSR.2010.5463288},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/86bugs-debian.pdf},
	author = {Davies, Julius and Hanyu Zhang and Nussbaum, Lucas and Daniel M. German}
}
@conference {952,
	title = {The Ultimate Debian Database: Consolidating bazaar metadata for Quality Assurance and data mining},
	booktitle = {2010 7th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2010)2010 7th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2010)},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {52 - 61},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	organization = {IEEE},
	address = {Cape Town, South Africa},
	abstract = {FLOSS distributions like RedHat and Ubuntu require a lot more complex infrastructures than most other FLOSS projects. In the case of community-driven distributions like Debian, the development of such an infrastructure is often not very organized, leading to new data sources being added in an impromptu manner while hackers set up new services that gain acceptance in the community. Mixing and matching data is then harder than should be, albeit being badly needed for Quality Assurance and data mining. Massive refactoring and integration is not a viable solution either, due to the constraints imposed by the bazaar development model. This paper presents the Ultimate Debian Database (UDD), which is the countermeasure adopted by the Debian project to the above "data hell". UDD gathers data from various data sources into a single, central SQL database, turning Quality Assurance needs that could not be easily implemented before into simple SQL queries. The paper also discusses the customs that have contributed to the data hell, the lessons learnt while designing UDD, and its applications and potentialities for data mining on FLOSS distributions.},
	keywords = {debian, metadata, udd},
	isbn = {978-1-4244-6802-7},
	doi = {10.1109/MSR.2010.5463277},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/52msr2010-udd.pdf},
	author = {Nussbaum, Lucas and Zacchiroli, Stefano}
}
@article {1239,
	title = {Weaving a Semantic Web Across OSS Repositories},
	journal = {International Journal of Open Source Software and Processes},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2010},
	month = {32/2010},
	pages = {29 - 40},
	abstract = {Several public repositories and archives of {\textquotedblleft}facts{\textquotedblright} about libre software projects, maintained either by open source communities or by research communities, have been flourishing over the Web in recent years. These have enabled new analysis and support for new quality assurance tasks. This paper presents some complementary existing tools, projects and models proposed both by OSS actors or research initiatives that are likely to lead to useful future developments in terms of study of the FLOSS phenomenon, and also to the very practitioners in the FLOSS development projects. A goal of the research conducted within the HELIOS project is to address bugs traceability issues. In this regard, the authors investigate the potential of using Semantic Web technologies in navigating between many different bugtracker systems scattered all over the open source ecosystem. By using Semantic Web techniques, it is possible to interconnect the databases containing data about open-source software projects development, which enables OSS partakers to identify resources, annotate them, and further interlink those using dedicated properties and collectively designing a distributed semantic graph.},
	keywords = {archive, bug, bugtracker, database, debian, forge, interoperability, ontology, OSLC-CM, RDF, repository of repositories, semantic, semantic Web},
	issn = {1942-3934},
	doi = {10.4018/jossp.2010040103},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/wopdasd2009-olivier-berger.pdf},
	author = {Olivier Berger and Valentin Vlasceanu and Christian Bac and Quang Vu Dang and Lauriere, St{\'e}phane}
}
@conference {1205,
	title = {Weaving~a~Semantic~Web~across~OSS~repositories: a~spotlight~on~bts-link,~UDD,~SWIM},
	booktitle = {4th Workshop on Public Data about Software Development (WoPDaSD 2009)},
	year = {2009},
	note = {position paper; non-experimental},
	abstract = {Several  public  repositories  and  archives  of  facts  about  libre software  projects,  developed either  by open  source  communities  or by research communities,  have been flourishing over  the Web in  the  recent  years.  These  enable  new analysis  and  support  new quality assurance tasks. 

By  using  Semantic  Web  techniques,  the  databases  containing data  about  open-source  software projects development can  be interconnected,  hence  letting  OSS  partakers  identify  resources, annotate  them  and  further  interlink  them  using  dedicated properties,  collectively  designing  a  distributed  semantic  graph. Such  links  expressed  with  standard  Semantic  techniques  are paving  the  way  to  new  applications  (including  ones  meant  for {\textquotedblleft}end-users{\textquotedblright}).  For  instance  this  may have  an  impact  on  the  way research efforts  are  conducted  (less  fragmented),  and  could  also be  used  by  development  communities  to  improve  Quality Assurance tasks. 

A goal  of the  research  conducted  within  the  HELIOS project, is to  address  bugtracker  synchronization  issues.  For that, the potential of using Semantic  Web  technologies  in  navigating between many different  bugtracker  systems scattered all  over the open source ecosystem is being investigated. 

This  position  paper  presents  some  existing  tools,  projects  and models  proposed  by  OSS  actors  that  are  complementary  to research  initiatives,  and  that  are  likely to  lead  to  useful  future  developments:  UDD (Ultimate  Debian  Database)  and  bts-link, developed by the  Debian community,  and  SWIM (Semantic Web enabled Issue Manager) developed by Mandriva. 

The  HELIOS team welcomes  comments  on the  future  paths  that  can  be  considered  in  using  the  Semantic  Web  approach  for improving these projects. },
	keywords = {bts-link, bug tracker, bugzilla, debian, ecosystem, helios, mandriva, semantic Web, swim, udd},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/HELIOS-WOPDASD-improved-Olivier.pdf},
	author = {Olivier Berger and Valentin Vlasceanu and Christian Bac and Lauri{\`e}re, St{\'e}phane}
}
@article {1120,
	title = {The institutions of open source software: Examining the Debian community*},
	journal = {Information Economics and Policy},
	volume = {20},
	year = {2008},
	note = {"using primary data from its mailing lists archives, handbooks written to inform potential and actual community members, and previous analyses of institutional evolution and political conflict"

no discussion of which lists, how many, or when they were gathered...?[ms]},
	month = {12/2008},
	pages = {333 - 344},
	abstract = {Free and open source software activities involve and, perhaps, evolve institutions (rules, norms and standards) that influence the formation, growth, and demise of communities. Community institutions are attractors for some individuals while discouraging other individuals from entering or continuing to participate. Their suitability may change as a community grows. This paper examines the institutions of the Debian community where issues of community identity, distribution of authority, and decentralisation have facilitated growth and development. These same institutions have also resulted in conflicts regarding community purposes and the quality and delivery of the community{\textquoteright}s output. We examine the institutional redesign undertaken to address these problems and derive implications for F/LOS communities and companies.},
	keywords = {authority, COMMUNITY, conflict, debian, decentralization, growth, institutions, leadership},
	issn = {01676245},
	doi = {10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.06.001},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/The_institutions_of_open_source_software-_IR.pdf},
	author = {Mateos Garcia, J. and Steinmueller, W.E.}
}
@article {Sadowski2008323,
	title = {Transition of governance in a mature open software source community: Evidence from the Debian case},
	journal = {Information Economics and Policy},
	volume = {20},
	number = {4},
	year = {2008},
	note = {"We primarily used internal documents related to the contents and context of different Debian projects."
"Furthermore, we attended several Debian conferences and were {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}lurking around{\textquotedblright} on the Debian mailing lists, websites, IRC channels, etc."},
	pages = {323 - 332},
	abstract = {As open source software (OSS) communities mature, they have to introduce a variety of governance mechanisms to manage the participation of their members and to coordinate the launch of new releases. The Debian community introduced new mechanisms of informal administrative control based on a constitution, elected leaders, and used interactive communication channels. We show that these control mechanisms were introduced as a response to emerging innovative opportunities due to the usage of source packages and to the need to build a responsive organization within the Debian OSS community.},
	keywords = {debian, governance},
	issn = {0167-6245},
	doi = {DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.05.001},
	url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V8J-4SHF4BS-1/2/579ba679ee43d7c77302f3595334dd24},
	author = {Bert M. Sadowski and Gaby Sadowski-Rasters and Geert Duysters}
}
@article {138,
	title = {Understanding knowledge sharing activities in free/open source software projects: An empirical study},
	journal = {Journal of Systems and Software},
	volume = {81},
	number = {3},
	year = {2008},
	note = {"Our study utilized data from the Debian project lists archives.... The Debian project hosts over 100 lists on all aspects related to the project. From the Debian lists archives (Debian Mailing Lists) we selected two high volume mailing lists. The following lists are analyzed in our study:
{\textbullet} Debian-user. This list is specifically dedicated to help and discussion among users of Debian who speak English. {\textbullet} Debian-devel. This list is specifically dedicated to discus-
sion about technical development topics.
Our data collection period for both lists was from January 2000 to December 2005. We obtained archived mbox files of the two lists. Each file is a single text file containing one month of archived email messages. Every email message has a unique message-id, together with other identification fields defined by the Internet Message Format (RFC) 2822 (Internet Message Format, 2001)."},
	pages = {431-446},
	abstract = {Free/Open Source Software (F/OSS) projects are people-oriented and knowledge intensive software development environments. Many researchers focused on mailing lists to study coding activities of software developers. How expert software developers interact with each other and with non-developers in the use of community products have received little attention. This paper discusses the altruistic sharing of knowledge between knowledge providers and knowledge seekers in the Developer and User mailing lists of the Debian project. We analyze the posting and replying activities of the participants by counting the number of email messages they posted to the lists and the number of replies they made to questions others posted. We found out that participants interact and share their knowledge a lot, their positing activity is fairly highly correlated with their replying activity, the characteristics of posting and replying activities are different for different kinds of lists, and the knowledge sharing activity of self-organizing Free/Open Source communities could best be explained in terms of what we called "Fractal Cubic Distribution" rather than the power-law distribution mostly reported in the literature. The paper also proposes what could be researched in knowledge sharing activities in F/OSS projects mailing list and for what purpose. The research findings add to {\textquoteright} our understanding of knowledge sharing activities in F/OSS projects. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.},
	keywords = {debian, email, email archives, mailing list},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/JSS_0.pdf},
	author = {Sowe, Sulayman K. and Ioannis Stamelos and Lefteris Angelis}
}
@conference {41,
	title = {The FLOSSWALD information system on free and open source software},
	booktitle = {9th International Workshop on Learning Software Organizations},
	year = {2006},
	note = {"Using these [FLOSSmole] data we intend to map the respective projects
to their developed software and thus extend the already
existing cases with new attributes or create new we cases
where necessary."

"Our first step
will be to evaluate the data provided by the Debian project
and the FLOSSmole project and design a knowledge base
and case structure to flexibly work with them."},
	month = {10/2006},
	abstract = {We propose the implementation of an intelligent information system on free and open source software. This system will consist of a case-based reasoning (CBR) system and several machine learning modules to maintain the knowledge base and train the CBR system thus enhancing its performance. Our knowledge base will include data on free and open source software provided by the Debian project, the FLOSSmole project, and other public free and open source software directories. We plan to enrich these data by learning additional information such as concepts and different similarities. With this knowledge base, we hope to be able to create an information system that will be capable of answering queries based on precise as well as vague criteria and give intelligent recommendations on software based on the preferences of the user.},
	keywords = {debian, flossmole},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/flosswald.pdf},
	author = {Reichle, M. and Hanft, A.}
}
@article {flosswp325,
	title = {Identifying Knowledge Brokers that Yield Software Engineering Knowledge in OSS Projects},
	journal = {Information and Software Technology},
	volume = {46},
	year = {2006},
	note = {Uses the Debian mailing lists "kde", "mentor", and "user". 
the collection period was from January 2001 to September 2004},
	month = {11/2006},
	pages = {1025-1033},
	abstract = {Much research on open source software development concentrates on developer lists and other software repositories to investigate what motivates professional software developers to participate in open source software projects. Little attention has been paid to individuals who spend valuable time in lists helping participants on some mundane yet vital project activities. Using three Debian lists as a case study we investigate the impact of knowledge brokers and their associated activities in open source projects. Social network analysis was used to visualize how participants are affiliated with the lists. The network topology reveals substantial community participation. The consequence of collaborating in mundane activities for the success of open source software projects is discussed. The direct beneficiaries of this research are in the identification of knowledge experts in open source software projects.},
	keywords = {debian, email, email archives, expertise, knowledge sharing, mailing list, project success, social network analysis},
	doi = {10.1016/j.infsof.2005.12.019},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/IST-Vol-48-11-2006.pdf},
	author = {Sowe, Sulayman K. and Ioannis Stamelos and Lefteris Angelis}
}
@conference {Robles:2006:MLS:1137983.1137986,
	title = {Mining large software compilations over time: another perspective of software evolution},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Mining software repositories},
	series = {MSR {\textquoteright}06},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {3{\textendash}9},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {With the success of libre (free, open source) software, a new type of software compilation has become increasingly common. Such compilations, often referred to as {\textquoteright}distributions{\textquoteright}, group hundreds, if not thousands, of software applications and libraries written by independent parties into an integrated system. Software compilations raise a number of questions that have not been targeted so far by software evolution, which usually focuses on the evolution of single applications. Undoubtedly, the challenges that software compilations face differ from those found in single software applications. Nevertheless, it can be assumed that both, the evolution of applications and that of software compilations, have similarities and dependencies.In this sense, we identify a dichotomy, common to that in economics, of software evolution in the small (micro-evolution) and in the large (macro-evolution). The goal of this paper is to study the evolution of a large software compilation, mining the publicly available repository of a well-known Linux distribution, Debian. We will therefore investigate changes related to hundreds of millions of lines of code over seven years. The aspects that will be covered in this paper are size (in terms of number of packages and of number of lines of code), use of programming languages, maintenance of packages and file sizes.},
	keywords = {debian, distributions, evolution, large software collections, lines of code, loc, metrics, mining software repositories, size, sloc, sloccount, software evolution, software integrators},
	isbn = {1-59593-397-2},
	doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1137983.1137986},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1137983.1137986},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/3miningLarge.pdf},
	author = {Gregorio Robles and Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona and Martin Michlmayr and Amor, Juan Jose}
}
@conference {731,
	title = {Evolution of Volunteer Participation in Libre Software Projects: Evidence from Debian},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	note = {"For each release we have retrieved the corresponding sources.gz file (see below) from the Debian archive. From it we have extracted information about the packages and their maintainers...."
},
	pages = {100-107},
	abstract = {Most libre software projects rely on the work of volunteers. Therefore, attracting people who contribute their time and technical skills is of paramount importance, both in technical and economic terms. This reliance on volunteers leads to some fundamental management challenges: volunteer contributions are inherently difficult to predict, plan and manage, especially in the case of large projects. In this paper we analyze the evolution in time of the human resources of one of the largest and most complex libre software projects composed primarily of volunteers, the Debian project. Debian currently has around 1300 volunteers working on several tasks: much activity is focused on packaging software applications and libraries, but there is also major work related to the maintenance of the infrastructure needed to sustain the development. We have performed a quantitative investigation of data from almost seven years, studying how volunteer involvement has affected the software...},
	keywords = {contributors, debian, maintainers, PopCon, popularity, Volunteers},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/857},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/robles_barahona_michlmayr-evolution_participation.pdf},
	author = {Gregorio Robles and Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona and Martin Michlmayr}
}
@proceedings {1195,
	title = {From Bazaar to Kibbutz: How Freedom Deals with Coherence in the Debian Project},
	year = {2004},
	note = {"I am a member of the Debian project since 2000."},
	pages = {71-75},
	abstract = {The goal of obtaining a coherent distribution of software packages where all programs interact smoothly increases its complexity with the number of applications, the number of architectures involved, and the number of system configurations supported. The Debian project aims at producing a software system with thousands of components running on eleven different hardware architectures, with three different operating
system kernels. This paper describes the project and how the work of hundreds of people that never meet one with another can be coordinated to produce reasonably robust and integrated systems.},
	keywords = {debian},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/monga72-76.pdf},
	author = {Monga, M.}
}
@article {flosswp201,
	title = {Managing Volunteer Activity in Free Software Projects},
	year = {2004},
	month = {July},
	abstract = {During the last few years, thousands of volunteers have created a large body of free software. Even though this accomplishment shows that the free software development model works, there are some drawbacks associated with this model. Due to the volunteer nature of most free software projects, it is impossible to fully rely on participants. Volunteers may become busy and neglect their duties. This may lead to a steady decrease of quality as work is not being carried out. The problem of inactive volunteers is intensified by the fact that most free software projects are distributed, which makes it hard to quickly identify volunteers who neglect their duties. This paper shows Debian{\textquoteright}s approach to inactive volunteers. Insights presented here can be applied to other free software projects in order to implement effective quality assurance strategies.},
	keywords = {debian, volunteer, volunteer teams},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/michlmayr-mia.pdf},
	author = {Martin Michlmayr}
}
@article {flosswp122,
	title = {Managing the Boundary of an {\textquoteright}Open{\textquoteright} Project},
	year = {2003},
	month = {October},
	abstract = {In the past ten years, the boundaries between public and open science and commercial research efforts have become more porous. Scholars have thus more critically examined ways in which these two institutional regimes intersect. Large open source software projects have also attracted commercial collaborators and now struggle to develop code in an open public environment that still protects their communal boundaries. This research applies a dynamic social network approach to understand how one community managed software project, Debian, develops a membership process. We examine the project{\textquoteright}s face-to-face social network during a five-year period (1997-2001) to see how changes in the social structure affect the evolution of membership mechanisms and the determination of gatekeepers. While the amount and importance of a contributor{\textquoteright}s work increases the probability that a contributor will become a gatekeeper, those more central in the social network are more likely to become gatekeepers and influence the membership process. A greater understanding of the mechanisms open projects use to manage their boundaries has critical implications for research and knowledge producing communities operating in pluralistic, open and distributed environments.},
	keywords = {debian, membership, social network analysis},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/omahonyferraro.pdf},
	author = {Siobhan O{\textquoteright}Mahony}
}
@conference {1248,
	title = {Supporting Distributed and Decentralized Projects: Drawing Lessons from the Open Source Community},
	booktitle = {1st Workshop on Open Source in an Industrial Context},
	year = {2003},
	note = {"We begin the remainder of the paper with discussion of a survey of open source projects, showing similarities that have arisen in tool usage"},
	month = {10/2003},
	abstract = {Open source projects are typically organized in a distributed and decentralized manner. These factors strongly determine the processes followed and constrain the types of tools that can be utilized. This paper explores how distribution and decentralization have affected processes and tools in existing open source projects with the goals of summarizing the lessons learned and identifying opportunities for improving both. Issues considered include decision-making, accountability, communication, awareness, rationale, managing source code, testing, and release management.},
	keywords = {abiword, apache, debian, freebsd, kde, linux, mozilla, mysql, perl, PHP, postgresql, python, subversion, tomcat, tools},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/erenkrantz2003.pdf},
	author = {Erenkrantz, J. and Taylor, R.N.}
}
