@proceedings {1752,
	title = {Why Power Laws? An Explanation from Fine-Grained Code Changes},
	year = {2015},
	note = {"The data used in this section come from four open source Java projects. We used CVSANALY to collect data from their Git repositories."},
	abstract = {Throughout the years, empirical studies have found
power law distributions in various measures across many software
systems. However, surprisingly little is known about how
they are produced. What causes these power law distributions?
We offer an explanation from the perspective of fine-grained
code changes. A model based on preferential attachment and selforganized
criticality is proposed to simulate software evolution.
The experiment shows that the simulation is able to render power
law distributions out of fine-grained code changes, suggesting
preferential attachment and self-organized criticality are the
underlying mechanism causing the power law distributions in
software systems.},
	keywords = {Apache Maven, cvsanaly, eclipse, git, Google Guice, java, jedit, open source},
	url = {https://users.soe.ucsc.edu/~linzhp/msr2015.pdf},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/msr2015.pdf},
	author = {Zhongpeng Lin and Jim Whitehead}
}
@proceedings {1510,
	title = {A Historical Dataset for the Gnome Ecosystem},
	year = {2013},
	month = {05/2013},
	abstract = {We present a dataset of the open source software ecosystem Gnome from a social point of view. We have collected historical data about the contributors to all Gnome projects stored on git.gnome.org, taking into account the problem of identity matching, and associating different activity types to the contributors. This type of information is very useful to complement the traditional, source-code related information one can obtain by mining and analyzing the actual source code. The dataset can be obtained at https://bitbucket.org/mgoeminne/sgl-flossmetric-dbmerge.},
	keywords = {cvsanaly, flossmetrics, gnome},
	author = {Mathieu Goeminne and Ma{\"e}lick Claes and Mens, Tom}
}
@conference {941,
	title = {Evolution of the core team of developers in libre software projects},
	booktitle = {2009 6th IEEE International Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)2009 6th IEEE International Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {167 - 170},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	organization = {IEEE},
	address = {Vancouver, BC, Canada},
	abstract = {In many libre (free, open source) software projects, most of the development is performed by a relatively small number of persons, the "core team". The stability and permanence of this group of most active developers is of great importance for the evolution and sustainability of the project. In this position paper we propose a quantitative methodology to study the evolution of core teams by analyzing information from source code management repositories. The most active developers in different periods are identified, and their activity is calculated over time, looking for core team evolution patterns.},
	keywords = {core, cvs, cvsanaly, developers, evolution, gimp, scm},
	isbn = {978-1-4244-3493-0},
	doi = {10.1109/MSR.2009.5069497},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/167core-evolution.pdf},
	author = {Gregorio Robles and Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona and Herraiz, Israel}
}
@conference {1211,
	title = {Are FLOSS developers committing to CVS/SVN as much as  they are talking in mailing lists? Challenges for Integrating  data from Multiple Repositories},
	booktitle = {3rd Workshop on Public Data about Software Development (WoPDaSD 2008)},
	year = {2008},
	month = {09/2008},
	pages = {49-54},
	abstract = {This paper puts forward a framework for investigating Free and Open Source Software (F/OSS) developers activities in both source code and mailing lists repositories. We used data dumps of fourteen pro jects from the FLOSSMetrics (FM) retrieval system. Our intentions are (i) to present a possible methodology, its advantages and disadvantages which can benefit future researchers using some aspects of the FM retrieval system{\textquoteright}s data dumps, and (ii) discuss our initial research results on the contributions developers make to both coding and lists activities.},
	keywords = {cvs, cvsanaly, developers, email, email archives, flossmetrics, mailing list, mlstats, source code},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/49-542008.pdf},
	author = {Sowe, Sulayman K. and Samoladas, Ioannis and Ioannis Stamelos and Lefteris Angelis}
}
@conference {1017,
	title = {Forecasting the Number of Changes in Eclipse Using Time Series Analysis},
	booktitle = {Fourth International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories (MSR{\textquoteright}07:ICSE Workshops 2007)},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {32 - 32},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	organization = {IEEE},
	address = {Minneapolis, MN, USA},
	abstract = {In order to predict the number of changes in the following months for the project Eclipse, we have applied a statistical (non-explanatory) model based on time series analysis. We have obtained the monthly number of changes in the CVS repository of Eclipse, using the CVSAnalY tool. The input to our model was the filtered series of the number of changes per month, and the output was the number of changes per month for the next three months. Then we aggregated the results of the three months to obtain the total number of changes in the given period in the challenge.},
	keywords = {change management, cvs, cvsanaly, eclipse, prediction},
	isbn = {0-7695-2950-X},
	doi = {10.1109/MSR.2007.10},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/28300032.pdf},
	author = {Herraiz, Israel and Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona and Gregorio Robles}
}
@conference {1013,
	title = {Impact of the Creation of the Mozilla Foundation in the Activity of Developers},
	booktitle = {Fourth International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories (MSR{\textquoteright}07:ICSE Workshops 2007)},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {28 - 28},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	organization = {IEEE},
	address = {Minneapolis, MN, USA},
	abstract = {During 2003, the Mozilla project transitioned from company-promoted (sponsored by AOL) to community-promoted (sponsored by the Mozilla Foundation). What happened to the group of developers during this transition? There was any significant impact on its activity or composition? To answer these questions, we have performed an analysis of the CVS repository of Mozilla, using the CVSAnalY tool, finding little on activity, but dramatic changes in the the composition of the development team.},
	keywords = {cvs, cvsanaly, developers, mining challenge, mozilla, msr challenge, revision history},
	isbn = {0-7695-2950-X},
	doi = {10.1109/MSR.2007.15},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/28300028.pdf},
	author = {Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona and Gregorio Robles and Herraiz, Israel}
}
@conference {686,
	title = {Contributor Turnover in Libre Software Projects},
	booktitle = {OSS2006: Open Source Systems (IFIP 2.13)},
	series = {IFIP International Federation for Information Processing},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {273 - 286},
	publisher = {Springer},
	organization = {Springer},
	abstract = {A common problem that management faces in software companies is the high instability of their staff. In libre (free, open source) software projects, the permanence of developers is also an open issue, with the potential of causing problems amplified by the self-organizing nature that most of them exhibit. Hence, human resources in libre software projects are even more difficult to manage: developers are in most cases not bound by a contract and, in addition, there is not a real management structure concerned about this problem. This raises some interesting questions with respect to the composition of development teams in libre software projects, and how they evolve over time. There are projects lead by their original founders (some sort of {\textquotedblleft}code gods{\textquotedblright}), while others are driven by several different developer groups over time (i.e. the project {\textquotedblleft}regenerates{\textquotedblright} itself). 
In this paper, we propose a quantitative methodology, based on the analysis of the activity in the source code management repositories, to study how these processes (developers leaving, developers joining) affect libre software projects. The basis of it is the analysis of the composition of the core group, the group of developers most active in a project, for several time lapses. We will apply this methodology to several large, well-known libre software projects, and show how it can be used to characterize them. In addition, we will discuss the lessons that can be learned, and the validity of our proposal.
},
	keywords = {apache, committers, core, cvs, cvsanaly, developers, evolution, freebsd, gimp, gnome, kde, mono, mozilla},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34226-5_28},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/Contributor\%20Turnover\%20in\%20Libre\%20Software\%20Projects.pdf},
	author = {Gregorio Robles and Gonzalez-Barahona, Jesus}
}
@conference {1229,
	title = {Regurgitate: Using GIT For F/LOSS Data Collection},
	booktitle = {1st Workshop on Public Data about Software Development (WoPDaSD 2006)},
	year = {2006},
	abstract = {We have created a new tool, regurgitate, for importing CVS repositories into the GIT source code management system. Important features of GIT include great expressiveness in capturing relationships between revisions and across files as well as extremely high-speed processing. These features make GIT an ideal platform for gathering detailed longitudinal metrics for open source projects. The availability of regurgitate facilitates using GIT as an analysis tool for that majority of open source projects that keep their repositories in CVS. In particular, GIT is fast enough that it is practical to replay the entire development history of a project commit-at-a-time, collecting metrics at each step. We demonstrate this process for a simple metric and a collection of benchmark F/LOSS repositories.},
	keywords = {cvs, cvsanaly, git, history, promise, regurgitate, scm},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/massey.pdf},
	author = {Bart Massey and Keith Packard}
}
