@proceedings {1875,
	title = {Considering the use of walled gardens for FLOSS project communication},
	year = {2017},
	month = {05/2017},
	abstract = {At its core, free, libre, and open source software (FLOSS) is defined by its adherence to a set of licenses that give various freedoms to the users of the software, for example the ability to use the software, to read or modify its source code, and to distribute the software to others. In addition, many FLOSS projects and developers also champion other values related to "freedom" and "openness", such as transparency, for example in communication and decision-making, or community-orientedness, for example in broadening access, collaboration, and participation. This paper explores how one increasingly common software development practice - communicating inside non-archived, third-party "walled gardens" - puts these FLOSS values into conflict. If communities choose to use non-archived walled gardens for communication, they may be prioritizing one type of openness (broad participation) over another (transparency). We use 18 FLOSS projects as a sample to describe how walled gardens are currently being used for intra-project communication, as well as to determine whether or not these projects provide archives of these communications. Findings will be useful to the FLOSS community as a whole as it seeks to under- stand the evolution and impact of its communication choices.},
	keywords = {apache, chat, communication, email, free software, irc, mailing list, open source, Slack, Stack Overflow, teams, Wordpress},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-57735-7_1},
	url = {https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007\%2F978-3-319-57735-7_1.pdf},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/preprint_0.pdf},
	author = {Squire, Megan}
}
@proceedings {1890,
	title = {Designing for Participation: Three Models for Developer Involvement in Hybrid OSS Projects},
	volume = {496},
	year = {2017},
	month = {05/2017},
	pages = {23-33},
	publisher = {Springer},
	abstract = {This paper reports governance practices of three profit oriented companies that develop OSS software with the help of their respective open development communities. We explore how the companies allow development contributions from external stakeholders, and what knowledge they let out of their internal software development activities. The results lay ground for further research on how to organize openness of the software development process in hybrid setups where the needs of different stakeholders are partly competing - yet complementary.},
	keywords = {Community Management, Hybrid open source, open source},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-57735-7_3},
	url = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-57735-7_3},
	author = {M{\"a}enp{\"a}{\"a}, Hanna and Kilamo, Terhi and Mikkonen, Tommi and M{\"a}nnist{\"o}, Tomi}
}
@proceedings {1894,
	title = {Digging into the Eclipse Marketplace},
	volume = {496},
	year = {2017},
	month = {05/2017},
	pages = {60-65},
	publisher = {Springer},
	abstract = {Eclipse is an integrated development environment that can be extended with plug-ins. Thanks to Eclipse{\textquoteright}s success, a diverse community has been established with members coming from industry, open-source projects, and others, and a marketplace with more than 1.700 different plug-ins developed. Hence, the question arises how this marketplace is composed: Who contributes plug-ins? Which plug-ins are successful? Are there common characteristics or trends? To answer these questions, extensive investigations are necessary. In this paper, we present (i) an initial approach for corresponding analyses and (ii) preliminary results. Overall, we aim to pave the way for further research addressing, for example, motivations to participate in, or the evolution of, open marketplaces.},
	keywords = {Eclipse IDE, Eclipse Marketplace, empirical study, open source},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-57735-7_7},
	url = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-57735-7_7},
	author = {Kr{\"u}ger, J and Corr, N and Schr{\"o}ter, I and Leich, T}
}
@inbook {Kerzazi2017,
	title = {Knowledge Flows Within Open Source Software Projects: A Social Network Perspective},
	booktitle = {Advances in Ubiquitous Networking 2: Proceedings of the UNet{\textquoteright}16},
	year = {2017},
	pages = {247{\textendash}258},
	publisher = {Springer Singapore},
	organization = {Springer Singapore},
	address = {Singapore},
	abstract = {Developing software is knowledge-intensive activity, requiring extensive technical knowledge and awareness. The abstract part of development is the social interactions that drive knowledge flows between contributors, especially for Open Source Software (OSS). This study investigated knowledge sharing and propagation from social perspective using social network analysis (SNA). We mined and analyzed the issue and review histories of three OSS from GitHub. Particular attention has been paid to the socio-interactions through comments from contributors on reviews. We aim at explaining the propagation and density of knowledge flows within contributor networks. The results show that review requests flow from the core contributors toward peripheral contributors and comments on reviews are in a continuous loop from the core teams to the peripherals and back; and the core contributors leverage on their awareness and technical knowledge to increase their notoriety by playing the role of communication brokers supported by comments on work items.},
	keywords = {expertise, Knowledge flows, open source, SNA},
	isbn = {978-981-10-1627-1},
	doi = {10.1007/978-981-10-1627-1_19},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1627-1_19},
	author = {Kerzazi, Noureddine and El Asri, Ikram},
	editor = {El-Azouzi, Rachid and Menasche, Daniel Sadoc and Sabir, Essa{\"\i}d and De Pellegrini, Francesco and Benjillali, Mustapha}
}
@article {1746,
	title = {Evaluation of FLOSS by Analyzing Its Software Evolution:},
	journal = {Journal of Information Technology Research},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2015},
	month = {01/2015},
	pages = {62 - 81},
	abstract = {In today{\textquoteright}s world, management often rely on FLOSS (Free/Libre/Open Source Software) systems to run their organizations. However, the nature of FLOSS is different from the software they have been using in the last decades. Its development model is distributed, and its authors are diverse as many volunteers and companies may collaborate in the project. In this paper, we want to shed some light on how to evaluate a FLOSS system by looking at the Moodle platform, which is currently the most used learning management system among educational institutions worldwide. In contrast with other evaluation models that have been proposed so far, the one we present is based on retrieving historical information that can be obtained publicly from the Internet, allowing us to study its evolution. As a result, we will show how by using our methodology management can take informed decisions that lower the risk that organizations face when investing in a FLOSS system.  },
	keywords = {free software, LMS, moodle, open source, software engineering, software evaluation, software evolution},
	issn = {1938-7865},
	doi = {10.4018/JITR.2015010105},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/Evaluation\%20of\%20FLOSS\%20by\%20Analyzing\%20its\%20Software\%20Evolution\%20-\%20An\%20Example\%20Using\%20the\%20Moodle\%20Platform.pdf},
	author = {Macho, H{\'e}ctor J. and Gregorio Robles and Gonz{\'a}lez-Barahona, Jesus M}
}
@inbook {1741,
	title = {First Results About Motivation and Impact of License Changes in Open Source Projects},
	booktitle = {Open Source Systems: Adoption and Impact},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology},
	volume = {451},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {137-145},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	organization = {Springer International Publishing},
	abstract = {Free and open source software is characterized by the freedoms and criteria that are warranted by specific licenses. These licenses describe the rights and duties of the licensors and licensees. However, a licensing change may be necessary in the life of an open source project to meet legal developments or to allow the implementation of new business models. This paper examines the motivations and impacts of license changes in open source projects. After a state of the art on the subject, a set of case studies where projects changed their license is presented. Then a set of motivations to change licenses, the ways to legally make this change, the problems caused by this change and a set of benefits of the license change are discussed.
},
	keywords = {Business model, Contributor agreement, intellectual property, license, open source},
	isbn = {978-3-319-17836-3},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0_13},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0_13},
	author = {Viseur, Robert and Gregorio Robles},
	editor = {Damiani, Ernesto and Frati, Fulvio and Dirk Riehle and Wasserman, Anthony I.}
}
@inbook {1732,
	title = {How Developers Acquire FLOSS Skills},
	booktitle = {Open Source Systems: Adoption and Impact},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology},
	volume = {451},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {23-32},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	organization = {Springer International Publishing},
	abstract = {With the increasing prominence of open collaboration as found in free/libre/open source software projects and other joint production communities, potential participants need to acquire skills. How these skills are learned has received little research attention. This article presents a large-scale survey (5,309 valid responses) in which users and developers of the beta release of a popular file download application were asked which learning styles were used to acquire technical and social skills. We find that the extent to which a person acquired the relevant skills through informal methods tends to be higher if the person is a free/libre/open source code contributor, while being a professional software developer does not have this effect. Additionally, younger participants proved more likely to make use of formal methods of learning. These insights will help individuals, commercial companies, educational institutions, governments and open collaborative projects decide how they promote learning.
},
	keywords = {competencies, Informal learning, Non-formal learning, open source, Skills, Software developer},
	isbn = {978-3-319-17836-3},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0_3},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0_3},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/oss-2015.pdf},
	author = {Barcomb, Ann and Grottke, Michael and Stauffert, Jan-Philipp and Dirk Riehle and Jahn, Sabrina},
	editor = {Damiani, Ernesto and Frati, Fulvio and Dirk Riehle and Wasserman, Anthony I.}
}
@booklet {1781,
	title = {Lessons Learned from Applying Social Network Analysis on an Industrial Free/Libre/Open Source Software Ecosystem},
	year = {2015},
	abstract = {Many software projects are no longer done in-house by a single organization. Instead, we are in a new age where software is developed by a networked community of individuals and organizations, which base their relations to each other on mutual interest. Paradoxically, recent research suggests that software development can actually be jointly-developed by rival firms. For instance, it is known that the mobile-device makers Apple and Samsung kept collaborating in open source projects while running expensive patent wars in the court. Taking a case study approach, we explore how rival firms collaborate in the open source arena by employing a multi-method approach that combines qualitative analysis of archival data (QA) with mining software repositories (MSR) and Social Network Analysis (SNA). While exploring collaborative processes within the OpenStack ecosystem, our research contributes to Software Engineering research by exploring the role of groups, sub-communities and business models within a high-networked open source ecosystem. Surprising results point out that competition for the same revenue model (i.e., operating conflicting business models) does not necessary affect collaboration within the ecosystem. Moreover, while detecting the different sub-communities of the OpenStack community, we found out that the expected social tendency of developers to work with developers from same firm (i.e., homophony) did not hold within the OpenStack ecosystem. Furthermore, while addressing a novel, complex and unexplored open source case, this research also contributes to the management literature in coopetition strategy and high-tech entrepreneurship with a rich description on how heterogeneous actors within a high-networked ecosystem (involving individuals, startups, established firms and public organizations) joint-develop a complex infrastructure for big-data in the open source arena.},
	keywords = {business models, cloud computing, homophily, open source, Open-Coopetition, openstack, social network analysis, Software ecosystems},
	url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.04587},
	author = {Teixeira, Jose and Gregorio Robles and Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona}
}
@proceedings {1752,
	title = {Why Power Laws? An Explanation from Fine-Grained Code Changes},
	year = {2015},
	note = {"The data used in this section come from four open source Java projects. We used CVSANALY to collect data from their Git repositories."},
	abstract = {Throughout the years, empirical studies have found
power law distributions in various measures across many software
systems. However, surprisingly little is known about how
they are produced. What causes these power law distributions?
We offer an explanation from the perspective of fine-grained
code changes. A model based on preferential attachment and selforganized
criticality is proposed to simulate software evolution.
The experiment shows that the simulation is able to render power
law distributions out of fine-grained code changes, suggesting
preferential attachment and self-organized criticality are the
underlying mechanism causing the power law distributions in
software systems.},
	keywords = {Apache Maven, cvsanaly, eclipse, git, Google Guice, java, jedit, open source},
	url = {https://users.soe.ucsc.edu/~linzhp/msr2015.pdf},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/msr2015.pdf},
	author = {Zhongpeng Lin and Jim Whitehead}
}
@conference {Robles:2014:EDE:2597073.2597107,
	title = {Estimating Development Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects by Mining Software Repositories: A Case Study of OpenStack},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories},
	series = {MSR 2014},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {222{\textendash}231},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {Because of the distributed and collaborative nature of free / open source software (FOSS) projects, the development effort invested in a project is usually unknown, even after the software has been released. However, this information is becoming of major interest, especially ---but not only--- because of the growth in the number of companies for which FOSS has become relevant for their business strategy. In this paper we present a novel approach to estimate effort by considering data from source code management repositories. We apply our model to the OpenStack project, a FOSS project with more than 1,000 authors, in which several tens of companies cooperate. Based on data from its repositories and together with the input from a survey answered by more than 100 developers, we show that the model offers a simple, but sound way of obtaining software development estimations with bounded margins of error.
},
	keywords = {effort estimation, free software, mining software repositories, open source, openstack},
	isbn = {978-1-4503-2863-0},
	doi = {10.1145/2597073.2597107},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2597073.2597107},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/robles_0.pdf},
	author = {Gregorio Robles and Gonz{\'a}lez-Barahona, Jes{\'u}s M. and Cervig{\'o}n, Carlos and Capiluppi, Andrea and Izquierdo-Cort{\'a}zar, Daniel}
}
@conference {Robles:2014:FSD:2597073.2597129,
	title = {FLOSS 2013: A Survey Dataset About Free Software Contributors: Challenges for Curating, Sharing, and Combining},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories},
	series = {MSR 2014},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {396{\textendash}399},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {In this data paper we describe a data set obtained by means of performing an on-line survey to over 2,000 Free Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) contributors. The survey includes questions related to personal characteristics (gender, age, civil status, nationality, etc.), education and level of English, professional status, dedication to FLOSS projects, reasons and motivations, involvement and goals. We describe as well the possibilities and challenges of using private information from the survey when linked with other, publicly available data sources. In this regard, an example of data sharing will be presented and legal, ethical and technical issues will be discussed.
},
	keywords = {anonymization, data combining, data sharing, ethics, free software, microdata, msr data showcase, open data, open source, privacy, Survey},
	isbn = {978-1-4503-2863-0},
	doi = {10.1145/2597073.2597129},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2597073.2597129},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/msr14gregorio.pdf},
	author = {Gregorio Robles and Reina, Laura Arjona and Serebrenik, Alexander and Vasilescu, Bogdan and Gonz{\'a}lez-Barahona, Jes{\'u}s M.}
}
@inbook {1594,
	title = {How Do Social Interaction Networks Influence Peer Impressions Formation? A Case Study},
	booktitle = {Open Source Software: Mobile Open Source Technologies},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology},
	volume = {427},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {31-40},
	publisher = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	organization = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	abstract = {Due to their lack of physical interaction, Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) participants form impressions of their teammates largely based on sociotechnical mechanisms including: code commits, code reviews, mailing-lists, and bug comments. These mechanisms may have different effects on peer impression formation. This paper describes a social network analysis of the WikiMedia project to determine which type of interaction has the most favorable characteristics for impressions formation. The results suggest that due to lower centralization, high interactivity, and high degree of interactions between participants, the code review interactions have the most favorable characteristics to support impression formation among FOSS participants.},
	keywords = {COLLABORATION, FOSS, open source, OSS, social network analysis},
	isbn = {978-3-642-55127-7},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-55128-4_4},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55128-4_4},
	author = {Bosu, Amiangshu and Carver, JeffreyC.},
	editor = {Corral, Luis and Sillitti, Alberto and Succi, Giancarlo and Vlasenko, Jelena and Wasserman, AnthonyI.}
}
@conference {Vasilescu:2014:SQS:2531602.2531659,
	title = {How Social Q\&A Sites Are Changing Knowledge Sharing in Open Source Software Communities},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work \&\#38; Social Computing},
	series = {CSCW {\textquoteright}14},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {342{\textendash}354},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {Historically, mailing lists have been the preferred means for coordinating development and user support activities. With the emergence and popularity growth of social Q\&A sites such as the StackExchange network (e.g., StackOverflow), this is beginning to change. Such sites offer different socio-technical incentives to their participants than mailing lists do, e.g., rich web environments to store and manage content collaboratively, or a place to showcase their knowledge and expertise more vividly to peers or potential recruiters. A key difference between StackExchange and mailing lists is gamification, i.e., StackExchange participants compete to obtain reputation points and badges. In this paper, we use a case study of R (a widely-used tool for data analysis) to investigate how mailing list participation has evolved since the launch of StackExchange. Our main contribution is the assembly of a joint data set from the two sources, in which participants in both the texttt{r-help} mailing list and StackExchange are identifiable. This permits their activities to be linked across the two resources and also over time. With this data set we found that user support activities show a strong shift away from texttt{r-help}. In particular, mailing list experts are migrating to StackExchange, where their behaviour is different. First, participants active both on texttt{r-help} and on StackExchange are more active than those who focus exclusively on only one of the two. Second, they provide faster answers on StackExchange than on texttt{r-help}, suggesting they are motivated by the emph{gamified} environment. To our knowledge, our study is the first to directly chart the changes in behaviour of specific contributors as they migrate into gamified environments, and has important implications for knowledge management in software engineering.},
	keywords = {a, crowdsourced knowledge, gamification., mailing lists, open source, social q\&\#38},
	isbn = {978-1-4503-2540-0},
	doi = {10.1145/2531602.2531659},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2531602.2531659},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/cscw14.pdf},
	author = {Vasilescu, Bogdan and Serebrenik, Alexander and Devanbu, Prem and Filkov, Vladimir}
}
@inbook {1612,
	title = {A Layered Approach to Managing Risks in OSS Projects},
	booktitle = {Open Source Software: Mobile Open Source Technologies},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology},
	volume = {427},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {168-171},
	publisher = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	organization = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	abstract = {

In this paper, we propose a layered approach to managing risks in OSS projects. We define three layers: the first one for defining risk drivers by collecting and summarising available data from different data sources, including human-provided contextual information; the second layer, for converting these risk drivers into risk indicators; the third layer for assessing how these indicators impact the business of the adopting organisation. The contributions are: 1) the complexity of gathering data is isolated in one layer using appropriate techniques, 2) the context needed to interpret this data is provided by expert involvement evaluating risk scenarios and answering questionnaires in a second layer, 3) a pattern-based approach and risk reasoning techniques to link risks to business goals is proposed in the third layer.
},
	keywords = {Layered Model, open source, OSS, Risk Management},
	isbn = {978-3-642-55127-7},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-55128-4_23},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55128-4_23},
	author = {Franch, Xavier and Kenett, Ron and Mancinelli, Fabio and Susi, Angelo and Ameller, David and Ben-Jacob, Ron and Siena, Alberto},
	editor = {Corral, Luis and Sillitti, Alberto and Succi, Giancarlo and Vlasenko, Jelena and Wasserman, AnthonyI.}
}
@conference {Yamashita:2014:MSO:2597073.2597116,
	title = {Magnet or Sticky? An OSS Project-by-project Typology},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories},
	series = {MSR 2014},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {344{\textendash}347},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {For Open Source Software (OSS) projects, retaining existing contributors and attracting new ones is a major concern. In this paper, we expand and adapt a pair of population migration metrics to analyze migration trends in a collection of open source projects. Namely, we study: (1) project stickiness, i.e., its tendency to retain existing contributors and (2) project magnetism, i.e., its tendency to attract new contributors. Using quadrant plots, we classify projects as attractive (highly magnetic and sticky), stagnant (highly sticky, weakly magnetic), fluctuating (highly magnetic, weakly sticky), or terminal (weakly magnetic and sticky). Through analysis of the MSR challenge dataset, we find that: (1) quadrant plots can effectively identify at-risk projects, (2) stickiness is often motivated by professional activity and (3) transitions among quadrants as a project ages often coincides with interesting events in the evolution history of a project.
},
	keywords = {Developer migration, Magnet, mining challenge, msr challenge, open source, Sticky},
	isbn = {978-1-4503-2863-0},
	doi = {10.1145/2597073.2597116},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2597073.2597116},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/yamashita.pdf},
	author = {Yamashita, Kazuhiro and McIntosh, Shane and Kamei, Yasutaka and Ubayashi, Naoyasu}
}
@conference {Eckhardt:2014:MMO:2642803.2642810,
	title = {The Merits of a Meritocracy in Open Source Software Ecosystems},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2014 European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops},
	series = {ECSAW {\textquoteright}14},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {7:1{\textendash}7:6},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {The Eclipse open source ecosystem has grown from a small internal IBM project to one of the biggest Integrated Development Environments in the market. Open source communities and ecosystems do not follow the standard governance strategies typically used in large organizations. A meritocracy is a frequently occurring form of governance on different levels in open ecosystems. In this paper we investigate how this form of governance influences the health of projects within the Eclipse ecosystem in terms of the amount of commits within each month. We analyzed the hierarchy of Eclipse, how merits are conceptualized within the ecosystem and the effect of the appointments of mentors and project leads on the amount of commits. From our research, we can conclude that this system is not always as fair as it seems; merits are only a benefit in some cases.},
	keywords = {Ecosystem Health, Meritocracy, open source, Software ecosystems},
	isbn = {978-1-4503-2778-7},
	doi = {10.1145/2642803.2642810},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2642803.2642810},
	author = {Eckhardt, Evert and Kaats, Erwin and Slinger Jansen and Alves, Carina}
}
@conference {Barcomb:2014:VAR:2641580.2641628,
	title = {Volunteer Attraction and Retention in Open Source Communities},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of The International Symposium on Open Collaboration},
	series = {OpenSym {\textquoteright}14},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {40:1{\textendash}40:2},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {The importance of volunteers in open source has led to the position of community manager becoming more common in foundations and projects. Yet the advice for volunteer management and retention is fragmented, incomplete, contradictory, and has not been empirically examined. Our aim is to fill this gap by creating a comprehensive guidebook of best practices drawing from open source practitioner guides and general literature on volunteering, and to subject a subset of practices to empirical study. A method for evaluating volunteer attrition in terms of value to the organization will also be developed.
},
	keywords = {Community Management, FLOSS, open source, Recruitment, Service Duration, Volunteer Management, Volunteer Retention, Volunteers},
	isbn = {978-1-4503-3016-9},
	doi = {10.1145/2641580.2641628},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2641580.2641628},
	author = {Barcomb, Ann}
}
@inbook {1626,
	title = {When Are OSS Developers More Likely to Introduce Vulnerable Code Changes? A Case Study},
	booktitle = {Open Source Software: Mobile Open Source Technologies},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology},
	volume = {427},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {234-236},
	publisher = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	organization = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	abstract = {

We analyzed peer code review data of the Android Open Source Project (AOSP) to understand whether code changes that introduce security vulnerabilities, referred to as vulnerable code changes (VCC), occur at certain intervals. Using a systematic manual analysis process, we identified 60 VCCs. Our results suggest that AOSP developers were more likely to write VCCs prior to AOSP releases, while during the post-release period they wrote fewer VCCs.
},
	keywords = {FOSS, open source, OSS, security, vulnerability},
	isbn = {978-3-642-55127-7},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-55128-4_37},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55128-4_37},
	author = {Bosu, Amiangshu and Carver, JeffreyC. and Hafiz, Munawar and Hilley, Patrick and Janni, Derek},
	editor = {Corral, Luis and Sillitti, Alberto and Succi, Giancarlo and Vlasenko, Jelena and Wasserman, AnthonyI.}
}
@proceedings {1439,
	title = {A Comprehensive Study of Software Forks: Dates, Reasons and Outcomes},
	volume = {378},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {1-14},
	publisher = {IFIP AICT},
	abstract = {Summary. In general it is assumed that a software product evolves within the authoring company or group of developers that develop the project. However, in some cases different groups of developers make the software evolve in different directions, a situation which is commonly known as a fork. In the case of free software, although forking is a practice that is considered as a last resort, it is inherent to the four freedoms. This paper tries to shed some light on the practice of forking. Therefore, we have identified significant forks, several hundreds in total, and have studied them in depth. Among the issues that have been analyzed for each fork is the date when the forking occurred, the reason of the fork, and the outcome of the fork, i.e., if the original or the forking project are still developed. Our investigation shows, among other results, that forks occur in every software domain, that they have become more frequent in recent years, and that very few forks merge with the original project.},
	keywords = {forking, forks, free software, Legal, open source, social, software evolution, sustainability},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/paper_0.pdf},
	author = {Gregorio Robles and Gonz{\'a}lez-Barahona, Jes{\'u}s M.}
}
@proceedings {1445,
	title = {Emerging Hackerspaces {\textendash} Peer-Production Generation},
	volume = {378},
	year = {2012},
	month = {09/2012},
	pages = {94-111},
	publisher = {IFIP AICT},
	abstract = {This paper describes a peer-production movement, the hackerspace movement, its members and values. The emergence of hackerspaces, fablabs and makerspaces is changing how hacker communities and other like-minded communities function. Thus, an understanding of the nature of hackerspaces helps in detailing the features of contemporary peer-production. Building on previous work on {\textquoteright}fabbing{\textquoteright}, two different sets of results are presented: (1) empirical observations from a longitudinal study of hackerspace participants; and (2) a theoretical description of hacker generations as a larger context in which peer-production can be located. With regard to (1), research data has been collected through prolonged observation of hackerspace communities and two surveys.},
	keywords = {COMMUNITY, fabbing, fablab, hackerspace, makerspace, MOTIVATION, movement, open source, peer-production, Survey, sustainability},
	author = {Moilanen, Jarkko}
}
@proceedings {1284,
	title = {Libre Software as an Innovation Enabler in India: Experiences of a Bangalorian Software SME},
	year = {2011},
	month = {10/2011},
	pages = {220-232},
	publisher = {Springer},
	abstract = {Free/Libre and open source software (FLOSS) has been advocated for its presumed capacity to support native software industries in developing countries. It is said to create new spaces for exploration and to lower entry barriers to mature software markets, for example. However, little empirical research has been conducted concerning FLOSS business in a developing country setting and, thus, there is not much evidence to support or refute these claims. This paper presents a business case study conducted in India, a country branded as a {\textquoteright}software powerhouse{\textquoteright} of the developing world. The findings show how FLOSS has opened up significant opportunities for the case company, especially in terms of improving its innovative capability and upgrading in the software value chain. On the other hand, they also highlight some challenges to FLOSS involvement that rise specifically from the Indian context.},
	keywords = {free software, India, INNOVATION, open source, software business},
	author = {Henttonen, Katja}
}
@proceedings {1281,
	title = {License Update and Migration Processes in Open Source Software Projects},
	year = {2011},
	note = {"The case studies in this report are part of an ongoing, multi-year research project discovering and modeling open source software processes. Our research methodology is ethnographically informed, applying a grounded theory to the analysis of artifacts found in OSS projects. The primary data sources in this study come from mailing list archives of the Apache and NetBeans projects."},
	month = {10/2011},
	pages = {177-195},
	publisher = {Springer},
	abstract = {Open source software (OSS) has increasingly been the subject of research efforts. Central to this focus is the nature under which the software can be distributed, used, and modified and the causes and consequent effects on software development, usage, and distribution. At present, we have little understanding of, what happens when these licenses change, what motivates such changes, and how new licenses are created, updated, and deployed. Similarly, little attention has been paid to the agreements under which contributions are made to OSS projects and the impacts of changes to these agreements. We might also ask these same questions regarding the licenses governing how individuals and groups contribute to OSS projects. This paper focuses on addressing these questions with case studies of processes by which the Apache Software Foundation{\textquoteright}s creation and migration to Version 2.0 of the Apache Software License and the NetBeans project{\textquoteright}s migration to the Joint Licensing Agreement.},
	keywords = {apache, case study, email, email archive, license evolution, mailing list, netbeans, open source, process},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/1.pdf},
	author = {Chris Jensen and Walt Scacchi}
}
@article {1398,
	title = {The search for a research method for studying OSS process innovation},
	journal = {Empirical Software Engineering},
	volume = {16},
	year = {2011},
	month = {8/2011},
	pages = {514 - 537},
	abstract = {Medium-sized, open-participation Open Source Software (OSS) projects do not usually perform explicit software process improvement on any routine basis. It would be useful to understand how to get such a project to accept a process improvement proposal and hence to perform process innovation. We want to determine an effective and feasible qualitative research method for studying the above question. We present (narratively) a case study of how we worked towards and eventually found such a research method. The case involves four attempts at collecting suitable data about innovation episodes (direct participation (twice), polling developers for episodes, manually finding episodes in mailing list archives) and the adaptation of the Grounded Theory data analysis methodology. Direct participation allows gathering rather rich data, but does not allow for observing a sufficiently large number of innovation episodes. Polling developers for episodes did not prove to be useful. Using mailing list archives to find data to be analyzed is both feasible and effective. We also describe how the data thus found can be analyzed based on the Grounded Theory Method with suitable adjustments. By-and-large, our findings ought to apply to studying various phenomena in OSS development processes that are similarly heavyweight and infrequent. However, specific details may block this possibility and we cannot predict which details that might be. The amount of effort involved in direct participation approaches to qualitative research can easily be underestimated. Also, survey approaches are not well-suited for many process issues in OSS, because too few developers are sufficiently process-conscious. An approach based on passive observation is a viable alternative in the OSS context due to the availability of large amounts of fairly complete archival data. },
	keywords = {argouml, Bochs, bugzilla, Flyspray, FreeDOS, gEDA, grounded theory, Grub, Innovation introduction, KVM, mailing list, Methodology, MonetDB, open source, Request Tracket, Rox, U-Boot, Xfce},
	issn = {1573-7616},
	doi = {10.1007/s10664-011-9160-1},
	author = {Prechelt, Lutz and Oezbek, Christopher}
}
@proceedings {1271,
	title = {Towards a Unified Definition of Open Source Quality},
	year = {2011},
	note = {"In order to answer the research question, how is quality defined in the FLOSS literature, we performed a literature review."

"we searched Google Scholar for journal articles and conference papers containing the terms {\textquotedblleft}open source{\textquotedblright} and {\textquotedblleft}quality{\textquotedblright}"

"This process left us with 24 papers, to which we then added 16 from the quality and defect-fixing categories in [34] that met the above stated criteria.
This left us with 40 papers that defined quality and performed some form of empirical validation of that definition."

"there is little consensus in the FLOSS literature when it comes to defining quality."

defect resolution versus modularity: "Defect resolution rates (amount of defects resolved, speed of resolution) are the best way to measure a community{\textquoteright}s commitment to quality, because they recognize that FLOSS is not a static product, but ever evolving. These rates should be calculated per release, and not cumulatively, because the cycle of FLOSS evolution is the release. Researchers should be careful to only include defects and not new feature requests, duplicates, or poorly reported bugs into their calculations.
Modularity is being touted as the main driver of FLOSS quality success, but it needs to be further defined and studied in order to understand how it works."},
	month = {10/2011},
	pages = {17-33},
	publisher = {Springer},
	abstract = {Software quality needs to be specified and evaluated in order to determine the success of a development project, but this is a challenge with Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) because of its permanently emergent state. This has not deterred the growth of the assumption that FLOSS is higher quality than traditionally developed software, despite of mixed research results. With this literature review, we found the reason for these mixed results is that that quality is being defined, measured, and evaluated differently. We report the most popular definitions, such as software structure measures, process measures, such as defect fixing, and maturity assessment models. The way researchers have built their samples has also contributed to the mixed results with different project properties being considered and ignored. Because FLOSS projects are evolving, their quality is too, and it must be measured using metrics that take into account its community{\textquoteright}s commitment to quality rather than just its software structure. Challenges exist in defining what constitutes a defect or bug, and the role of modularity in affecting FLOSS quality.},
	keywords = {literature review, measurement, open source, quality, Software},
	author = {Ruiz, Claudia and Robinson, William}
}
@conference {1305,
	title = {Visualizing collaboration and influence in the open-source software community},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 8th working conference on Mining software repositories - MSR {\textquoteright}11},
	year = {2011},
	note = {"This data set includes the complete social graph of 500,000 follow links as well as over 1,000,000 commits and 50,000 users."

"...a large fraction of [GitHub] users provide a location in their profile, which we can turn into geographic coordinates using a geocoding API like PlaceFinder...

"For each repository, we extract the owner, collaborator, and contributor usernames, plus branch names. New user- names help to find new repositories, while branch names are used to fetch commit metadata. Using this method, the crawler uncovered 40,860 code repositories, representing 33,388 unique project names and 1,219,872 individual commits."

"In addition to crawled data, we use the complete GitHub user follower graph from Jan 19, 2011. This graph includes 452,248 links connecting 106,247 unique users, 47\% (49,500) of which could be geocoded with the PlaceFinder API"},
	month = {05/2011},
	pages = {223-226},
	publisher = {ACM Press},
	organization = {ACM Press},
	address = {New York, New York, USA},
	abstract = {We apply visualization techniques to user profiles and repository metadata from the GitHub source code hosting service. Our motivation is to identify patterns within this development community that might otherwise remain obscured. Such patterns include the effect of geographic distance on developer relationships, social connectivity and influence among cities, and variation in project-specific contribution styles (e.g., centralized vs. distributed). Our analysis examines directed graphs in which nodes represent users{\textquoteright} geographic locations and edges represent (a) follower relationships, (b) successive commits, or (c) contributions to the same project. We inspect this data using a set of visualization techniques: geo-scatter maps, small multiple displays, and matrix diagrams. Using these representations, and tools based on them, we develop hypotheses about the larger GitHub community that would be difficult to discern using traditional lists, tables, or descriptive statistics. These methods are not intended to provide conclusive answers; instead, they provide a way for researchers to explore the question space and communicate initial insights.},
	keywords = {COLLABORATION, data exploration, geography, geoscatter, github, graph, mapping, metadata, open source, social graph, user profiles, visualization},
	isbn = {9781450305747},
	doi = {10.1145/1985441.1985476},
	url = {http://vis.stanford.edu/files/2011-GotHub-MSR.pdf},
	author = {Marschner, Eli and Rosenfeld, Evan and Heer, Jeffrey and Heller, Brandon}
}
@conference {bird2010lee,
	title = {{Linkster: Enabling Efficient Manual Mining}},
	booktitle = {Demonstration Track, Proceedings of the 17th SIGSOFT Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering},
	year = {2010},
	note = {"LINKSTER efficiently displays, integrates, and allows inspection and annotation of information from three main sources of data: source code repositories, developer mailing lists archives, and bug tracking databases. LINKSTER requires access to a source code repository for file content and a database which contains the raw mined repository, mailing list, and bug tracking information. All notes and annotations made by the user are also recorded in the database."},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	abstract = {While many uses of mined software engineering data are automatic in nature, some techniques and studies either require, or can be improved, by manual methods. Unfortunately, manually inspecting, analyzing, and annotating mined data can be difficult and tedious, especially when information from multiple sources must be integrated. Oddly, while there are numerous tools and frameworks for automatically mining and analyzing data, there is a dearth of tools which facilitate manual methods. To fill this void, we have developed LINKSTER, a tool which integrates data from bug databases, source code repositories, and mailing list archives to allow manual inspection and annotation. LINKSTER has already been used successfully by an OSS project lead to obtain data for one empirical study.},
	keywords = {artifacts, bug, bug tracking, data mining, email, mailing lists, open source, source code},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/bird2010lee.pdf},
	author = {Christian Bird and Adrian Bachman and Rahman, Foyzur and Bernstein, Abraham}
}
@article {1338,
	title = {What Makes Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) Projects Successful? An Agent-Based Model of FLOSS Projects},
	journal = {International Journal of Open Source Software and Processes},
	volume = {1},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {1 - 13},
	abstract = {The last few years have seen a rapid increase in the number of Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) projects. Some of these projects, such as Linux and the Apache web server, have become phenomenally successful. However, for every successful FLOSS project there are dozens of FLOSS projects which never succeed. These projects fail to attract developers and/or consumers and, as a result, never get off the ground. The aim of this research is to better understand why some FLOSS projects flourish while others wither and die. This article presents a simple agent-based model that is calibrated on key patterns of data from SourceForge, the largest online site hosting open source projects. The calibrated model provides insight into the conditions necessary for FLOSS success and might be used for scenario analysis of future developments of FLOSS.},
	keywords = {Agent-Based Model, Emergent Properties, FLOSS, open source, Prediction Success, Simulation},
	issn = {1942-3934},
	doi = {10.4018/jossp.2009040101},
	url = {http://www.public.asu.edu/~majansse/pubs/ijossp09.pdf},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/ijossp09.pdf},
	author = {Radtke, Nicholas P. and Janssen, Marco A. and Collofello, James S.}
}
@conference {SGKL09,
	title = {Evaluating the Quality of Open Source Software},
	booktitle = {Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science},
	volume = {233},
	year = {2008},
	note = {"the software source code and the associated data stored in the version control system, the bug tracking databases, the mailing lists, and the wikis allow us to evaluate quality in a transparent way"
"The data collection system collects the raw data from open source projects"
Mailing lists are measured in: Number of unique subscribers, Number of messages in user/support list per month, Number of messages in developers list per month, Average thread depth},
	month = {03/2009},
	pages = {5{\textendash}28},
	publisher = {The Reengineering Forum},
	organization = {The Reengineering Forum},
	abstract = {Traditionally, research on quality attributes was either kept under wraps within the organization that performed it, or carried out by outsiders using narrow, black-box techniques. The emergence of open source software has changed this picture allowing us to evaluate both software products and the processes that yield them. Thus, the software source code and the associated data stored in the version control system, the bug tracking databases, the mailing lists, and the wikis allow us to evaluate quality in a transparent way. Even better, the large number of (often competing) open source projects makes it possible to contrast the quality of comparable systems serving the same domain. Furthermore, by combining historical source code snapshots with significant events, such as bug discoveries and fixes, we can further dig into the causes and effects of problems. Here we present motivating examples, tools, and techniques that can be used to evaluate the quality of open source (and by extension also proprietary) software. },
	keywords = {bug tracking system, email, email archives, mailing list, metrics, open source, process quality attributes, product quality attributes, source code, SQO-OSS, wiki},
	doi = {10.1016/j.entcs.2009.02.058},
	url = {http://www.dmst.aueb.gr/dds/pubs/conf/2008-SQM-SQOOSS/html/SGKL09.html},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/entcs-sqooss.pdf},
	author = {Diomidis Spinellis and Gousios, Georgios and Vassilios Karakoidas and Panagiotis Louridas and Paul J. Adams and Samoladas, Ioannis and Ioannis Stamelos}
}
@conference {Krogstie:2008:PTB:1368088.1368201,
	title = {Power through brokering: open source community participation in software engineering student projects},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering},
	series = {ICSE {\textquoteright}08},
	year = {2008},
	pages = {791{\textendash}800},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {Many software engineering projects use open source software tools or components. The project team{\textquoteright}s active participation in the open source community may be necessary for the team to use the technology. Based on an in-depth field study of industry software engineering project students interacting with an open source community, we find that participation in the community may affect the team{\textquoteright}s work and learning by strengthening the power of the broker between the team and the community. We outline pitfalls and benefits of having student teams acquire development-related knowledge from open source communities. The findings are relevant to the organization and supervision of software engineering student projects interacting with open source communities.},
	keywords = {Communities Of Practice, computer science education, FLOSS, open source, software engineering, software engineering education},
	isbn = {978-1-60558-079-1},
	doi = {10.1145/1368088.1368201},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1368088.1368201},
	author = {Krogstie, Birgit R.}
}
@conference {Spinellis:2008:TFK:1368088.1368140,
	title = {A tale of four kernels},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering},
	series = {ICSE {\textquoteright}08},
	year = {2008},
	pages = {381{\textendash}390},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {The FreeBSD, GNU/Linux, Solaris, and Windows operating systems have kernels that provide comparable facilities. Interestingly, their code bases share almost no common parts, while their development processes vary dramatically. We analyze the source code of the four systems by collecting metrics in the areas of file organization, code structure, code style, the use of the C preprocessor, and data organization. The aggregate results indicate that across various areas and many different metrics, four systems developed using wildly different processes score comparably. This allows us to posit that the structure and internal quality attributes of a working, non-trivial software artifact will represent first and foremost the engineering requirements of its construction, with the influence of process being marginal, if any.},
	keywords = {comparison, freebsd, linux, open source, opensolaris, proprietary software, windows, wrk},
	isbn = {978-1-60558-079-1},
	doi = {10.1145/1368088.1368140},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1368088.1368140},
	author = {Diomidis Spinellis}
}
@article {125,
	title = {Membership herding and network stability in the open source community: The Ising perspective},
	journal = {Management Science},
	volume = {53},
	number = {7},
	year = {2007},
	month = {Jul},
	pages = {1086-1101},
	abstract = {The aim of this paper is twofold: (1) to conceptually understand membership dynamics in the open source software (OSS) community, and (2) to explore how different network characteristics (i.e., network size and connectivity) influence the stability of an OSS network. Through the lens of Ising theory, which is widely accepted in physics, we investigate basic patterns of interaction and present fresh conceptual insight into dynamic and reciprocal relations among OSS community members. We also perform computer simulations based on empirical data collected from two actual OSS communities. Key findings include: (1) membership herding is highly present when external influences (e.g., the availability of other OSS projects) are weak, but decreases significantly when external influences increase, (2) propensity for membership herding is most likely to be seen in a large network with random connectivity, and (3) for large networks, when external influences are weak, random connectivity will result in higher network strength than scale-free connectivity (as external influences increase, however, the reverse phenomenon is observed). In addition, scale-free connectivity appears to be less volatile than random connectivity in response to an increase in the strength of external influences. We conclude with several implications that may be of significance to OSS stakeholders in particular, and to a broader range of online communities in general.},
	keywords = {BEHAVIOR, DYNAMICS, ECONOMICS, INNOVATION, INVESTMENT, Ising theory, membership herding, MODEL, MOTIVATION, network connectivity, network stability, open source, PHASE-TRANSITION, UNCERTAINTY},
	isbn = {0025-1909},
	author = {Oh, Wonseok and Jeon, Sangyong}
}
@article {119,
	title = {Social network structures in open source software development teams},
	journal = {Journal of Database Management},
	volume = {18},
	number = {2},
	year = {2007},
	note = {"Three projects were selected from SourceForge.net in terms of their similarities as well as their differences. Monthly data were extracted from the bug tracking systems in order to achieve a longitudinal view of the interaction pattern of each project. Social network analysis was used to generate the indices of social structure."

no pdf},
	month = {Apr-Jun},
	pages = {25-40},
	abstract = {Drawing on social network theories and previous studies, this research examines the dynamics of social network structures in open source software (OSS) teams. Three projects were selected from SourceForge.net in terms of their similarities as well as their differences. Monthly data were extracted from the bug tracking systems in order to achieve a longitudinal view of the interaction pattern of each project. Social network analysis was used to generate the indices of social structure. The finding suggests that the interaction pattern of OSS projects evolves from a single hub at the beginning to a corel periphery model as the projects move forward.},
	keywords = {bug tracking, bugs, COMMUNITY, INNOVATION, longitudinal study, MODEL, open source, social, social network analysis, social networks, sourceforge, structure},
	isbn = {1063-8016},
	author = {Long, Y. and Siau, K.}
}
@conference {Gurbani:2006:CSC:1134285.1134352,
	title = {A case study of a corporate open source development model},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering},
	series = {ICSE {\textquoteright}06},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {472{\textendash}481},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {Open source practices and tools have proven to be highly effective for overcoming the many problems of geographically distributed software development. We know relatively little, however, about the range of settings in which they work. In particular, can corporations use the open source development model effectively for software projects inside the corporate domain? Or are these tools and practices incompatible with development environments, management practices, and market-driven schedule and feature decisions typical of a commercial software house? We present a case study of open source software development methodology adopted by a significant commercial software project in the telecommunications domain. We extract a number of lessons learned from the experience, and identify open research questions.},
	keywords = {architecture, case study, open source, session initiation protocol, software development, vkg},
	isbn = {1-59593-375-1},
	doi = {10.1145/1134285.1134352},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1134285.1134352},
	author = {Gurbani, Vijay K. and Garvert, Anita and Herbsleb, James D.}
}
@conference {Bird:2006:MES:1137983.1138016,
	title = {Mining email social networks},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Mining software repositories},
	series = {MSR {\textquoteright}06},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {137{\textendash}143},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {Communication \& Co-ordination activities are central to large software projects, but are difficult to observe and study in traditional (closed-source, commercial) settings because of the prevalence of informal, direct communication modes. OSS projects, on the other hand, use the internet as the communication medium,and typically conduct discussions in an open, public manner. As a result, the email archives of OSS projects provide a useful trace of the communication and co-ordination activities of the participants. However, there are various challenges that must be addressed before this data can be effectively mined. Once this is done, we can construct social networks of email correspondents, and begin to address some interesting questions. These include questions relating to participation in the email; the social status of different types of OSS participants; the relationship of email activity and commit activity (in the CVS repositories) and the relationship of social status with commit activity. In this paper, we begin with a discussion of our infrastructure (including a novel use of Scientific Workflow software) and then discuss our approach to mining the email archives; and finally we present some preliminary results from our data analysis.},
	keywords = {communication, contributions, developers, email, email archives, mailing lists, open source, social networks},
	isbn = {1-59593-397-2},
	doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1137983.1138016},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1137983.1138016},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/137MiningEmail.pdf},
	author = {Christian Bird and Gourley, Alex and Devanbu, Prem and Gertz, Michael and Swaminathan, Anand}
}
@conference {Bird:2006:MES:1137983.1138033,
	title = {Mining email social networks in Postgres},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Mining software repositories},
	series = {MSR {\textquoteright}06},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {185{\textendash}186},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {Open Source Software (OSS) projects provide a unique opportunity to gather and analyze publicly available historical data. The Postgres SQL server, for example, has over seven years of recorded development and communication activity. We mined data from both the source code repository and the mailing list archives to examine the relationship between communication and development in Postgres. Along the way, we had to deal with the difficult challenge of resolving email aliases. We used a number of social network analysis measures and statistical techniques to analyze this data. We present our findings in this paper.},
	keywords = {developers, email, email archives, open source, postgresql, scm, social network analysis, social networks, source code, status},
	isbn = {1-59593-397-2},
	doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1137983.1138033},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1137983.1138033},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/185MiningEmail.pdf},
	author = {Christian Bird and Gourley, Alex and Devanbu, Prem and Gertz, Michael and Swaminathan, Anand}
}
@conference {779,
	title = {Carrot2 Clustering Framework},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {298-299},
	abstract = {Carrot2 is an Open Source framework for research experiments with querying various textual data sources, processing and presentation of the results. Its main goal is to promote component reuse in order to reduce the effort involved in the development of Information Retrieval software. So far, the most successful and popular application of Carrot2 has been organizing results of Internet searches into easy to browse thematic groups called clusters. In this area, the project successfully competes with commercial counterparts like Vivisimo or iBoogie.},
	keywords = {BSD license, cluster, clustering framework, open source, research, result},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/788},
	author = {Weiss, Dawid and Osi{\textasciiacute}nski, Stanis{\l}aw}
}
@conference {795,
	title = {The challenges of creating open source education software: the Gild experience},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {338-340},
	keywords = {COMMUNITY, eclipse, learning environment, novice programmers, open source, programming environment},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/1539},
	author = {Daniel M. German and Rigby, Peter and Cubranic, Davor and Storey, Margaret-Anne and Thomson, Suzanne}
}
@conference {792,
	title = {Experiences teaching a graduate course in Open Source Software Engineering},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {326-328},
	abstract = {This paper describes the early experiences of a graduate course in open source software engineering at the Department of Computer Science at the University Victoria. It includes a description of the motivation for the course, its structure and evaluation methods. It concludes with a discussion of the lessons learned and its future.},
	keywords = {course, FOSS, MOTIVATION, open source, open source software engineering},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/971},
	author = {Daniel M. German}
}
@conference {775,
	title = {eZPA portale e-government per enti locali},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {289-290},
	abstract = {Tra i numerosi settori in cui Internet sta intervenendo con una forte carica di {\textquotedblleft}modernizzazione{\textquotedblright}, quello dell{\textquoteright}e- Government, inteso come possibilit{\`a} per tutti gli utenti, per tutti i cittadini, di gestire il rapporto con la Pubblica Amministrazione, anche on line, sta producendo gli effetti maggiormente innovativi. L{\textquoteright}occasione fornitaci dall{\textquoteright}amministrazione del Comune di Ozzano dell{\textquoteright}Emilia ha permesso di sviluppare l{\textquoteright}applicazione eZPA, scritta con software a codice sorgente aperto e rilasciata con licenza GNU-GPL (General Publish Licence), liberamente utilizzabile e modificabile. Il portale consente la fruibilit{\`a} telematica dei servizi comunali sia ai clienti esterni (cittadini e imprese), sia agli utenti interni (dipendenti e collaboratori comunali), attraverso una struttura di sportelli fisici/virtuali. In particolare, l{\textquoteright}utilizzo della metafora di comunicazione {\textquotedblleft}Evento della vita{\textquotedblright},[1] raccomandata dalle linee guida del Ministro per l{\textquoteright}Innovazione e le Tecnologie, ha ...},
	keywords = {e-government, enti locali, INTERNET, open source, pubblica amministrazione},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/874},
	author = {Colognesi, Cristina and Guandalini, Stefano}
}
@conference {773,
	title = {Fare Open Source all{\textquoteright}Istat: il generatore di data-entry per indagini statistiche},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {283-286},
	abstract = {Viene presentata una prima esperienza di sviluppo di software Open Source all{\textquoteright}Istat, che riguarda un sistema generalizzato di data-entry per indagini statistiche. L{\textquoteright}applicazione, in via di rilascio, copre la fase di acquisizione dati propria delle indagini statistiche e consentir{\`a} di generare maschere che potranno essere utilizzate sia in Intranet che sul Web. L{\textquoteright}applicazione descritta, che utilizza PHP e XML come tecnologie fondanti, rappresenta un{\textquoteright}esperienza concreta di sviluppo Open Source nella quale l{\textquoteright}Istat vuole riversare le proprie esperienze specifiche, mettendole poi a disposizione delle altre strutture interessate.},
	keywords = {data-entry, indagini statistiche, open source, PHP, web, XML},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/903},
	author = {Altarocca, Francesco and Vaccari, Carlo}
}
@conference {786,
	title = {Future Development in the European Software Industry: Patentability of Computer Programs or Open Source Software?},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {311-313},
	abstract = {Economic literature has treated the patent system as an indispensable tool to incentive inventive activity and to foster diffusion of technological improvements, but recent developments have brought at the center of the stage the Open Source phenomenon which is based on completely different mechanisms among which the free disclosure of the inventive steps. This work analyzes changes that are taking place into patent literature in order to give account of the desirability of patents in software sector. In addition some ideas on empirical analysis are put forward: the possibility of measuring the relationship between patents and input of innovation process in the software sector and the influence that private firms will have on Open Source developers motivations.},
	keywords = {european, market segment, open source, os, patent, patent literature, patentability, software industry, software sector},
	url = {http://hdl.handle.net/2038/966},
	author = {Rentocchini, Francesco}
}
@conference {781,
	title = {Idealism and Commercialism {\textendash} Developing Free/Libre and Open Source Software in Private Businesses},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {301-302},
	abstract = {This paper presents a PhD research project undertaken as part of a larger project aimed at paying sociological attention to different forms of distribution of knowledge, including program code. We want to investigate empirically how the commons knows as free/open source software is actually made. In my PhD project I study the use and development of FLOSS in private businesses, focusing on professional developers working in private businesses and at the same time participating in the FLOSS community. The theoretical starting point is theories of power, dominance and legitimacy by Max Weber and Pierre Bourdieu.},
	keywords = {dominance, FLOSS, FLOSS community, free/libre, legitimacy, linux, open source, Private Businesses, social organisation, theories of power},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/970},
	author = {Lundestad, Christian V.}
}
@conference {784,
	title = {An Investigation of Developer and User Activity In FLOSS Projects},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {307-308},
	abstract = {This document outlines research plans to investigate the evolution of a set of FLOSS (Free, Libre, and Open Source Software) projects and their communities by looking at patterns of developer and user activity through a combination of analysis of archived material and interaction with the project communities. The goal of the proposed research is to better understand the dynamics within FLOSS projects and how some projects become successful.},
	keywords = {developer, development, FLOSS, FLOSS project, open source, pattern, portal, project},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/712},
	author = {Gale, Stephen}
}
@conference {777,
	title = {Live! I-Learn @ Home},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {294-295},
	abstract = {In this paper we present a live CD based on GNU/Linux (Knoppix), customized in order to supply a complete working and studying environment for the students of the Corso di Studi in Informatica. In particular, it supplies the Moodle course management system for e-learning complete of the courses of the first year. The aim is to enable the use of such resources off-line and without requiring special skills that will be achieved by studying but that newbies do not have.},
	keywords = {e-learning, environment, GNU/Linux, java, open source, technology},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/977},
	author = {Baldoni, Matteo and Baroglio, Cristina and Roversi, Luca and Grandi, Claudio}
}
@conference {791,
	title = {Looking at Free and Open Source Software: A Study about F/OSS Developers{\textquoteright} Culture},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {324-325},
	abstract = {My work will be a cultural study of a F/OSS development project, mixing a symmetric approach with the interaction analysis by Erving Goffman. Methodologically I will approach cyber {\textendash} ethnography.},
	keywords = {cultural analysis, cultural study, cyber, F/OSS developers, open source, software development},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/968},
	author = {Teli, Maurizio}
}
@conference {774,
	title = {Migrazione di un Sistema Informativo da UNIX-AIX a UNIX-Linux},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {287-288},
	abstract = {Il presente documento ha come obiettivo quello di descrivere la politica adottata dall{\textquoteright}Istituto Nazionale di Statistica rispetto all{\textquoteright}uso del software Open Source. In particolare vengono descritti i sistemi che attualmente operano su piattaforma Linux, quelli che sono in fase di migrazione e le scelte che si sono fatte nel caso di convivenza tra sistemi {\textquotedblleft}open{\textquotedblright} e sistemi {\textquotedblleft}proprietari{\textquotedblright}. Viene inoltre illustrata l{\textquoteright}architettura hardware scelta nel caso della migrazione di un sistema complesso da piattaforma interamente proprietaria (UNIX AIX) a piattaforma con sistema operativo open Linux Red Hat.},
	keywords = {architettura hardware, linux, migrazione, open source, server, sistema informativo, sistema proprietario, unix aix},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/978},
	author = {Colasanti, Cecilia and Patruno, Vincenzo and Vaccari, Carlo}
}
@conference {772,
	title = {OTRS: un sistema a ticket per la gestione dell{\textquoteright}help desk},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {281},
	abstract = {Descriviamo l{\textquoteright}esperienza di utilizzo di un software a codice sorgente aperto per la gestione a ticket dell{\textquoteright}help desk informatico del D.I.S.I. (Dipartimento di Informatica e Scienze delll{\textquoteright}Informazione) dell{\textquoteright}Universit{\`a} degli Studi di Genova.},
	keywords = {help desk, open source, ticketing system, trouble ticket},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/1423},
	author = {Bencetti, Stefano and Verduci, Gianni}
}
@conference {785,
	title = {Quality Improvement in Volunteer Free Software Projects: Exploring the Impact of Release Management},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {309-310},
	abstract = {Even though free software has achieved great popularity and success in recent years, there are a number of product quality challenges facing the open source development model. There is significant room for further quality improvement and one area that deserves special attention is release management. This research will identify problems with current release practices, verify possible advantages of an increasingly popular release model, and develop interventions to improve release management in free software projects. The research also aims to answer the fundamental question as to how volunteer projects can deliver predictable and high quality software.},
	keywords = {free software, open source, process improvement, quality assurance, release management, volunteer projects},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/1429},
	author = {Martin Michlmayr}
}
@conference {794,
	title = {SchoolTool: Defining Our Niche in the Open Source Architecture of Schools},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {334-337},
	keywords = {information system, open source, school, student},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/1436},
	author = {Hoffman, Tom}
}
@conference {790,
	title = {	Socialization practices in FLOSS development teams},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {322-323},
	abstract = {Socialization of new members into Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) development teams is an important but little studied process in producing effective teams of this type. This is a dissertation proposal for a virtual ethnographic study that looks at the mechanisms and processes used to socialize new members into the team in order to help maintain a common group identity and focus.},
	keywords = {development team, FLOSS, member, open source, socialization},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/1438},
	author = {Chengetai Masango}
}
@conference {Fielding:2005:SAO:1062455.1062474,
	title = {Software architecture in an open source world},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Software engineering},
	series = {ICSE {\textquoteright}05},
	year = {2005},
	pages = {43{\textendash}43},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {In spite of the hype and hysteria surrounding open source software development, there is very little that can be said of open source in general. Open source projects range in scope from the miniscule, such as the thousands of non-maintained code dumps left behind at the end of class projects, dissertations, and failed commercial ventures, to the truly international, with thousands of developers collaborating, directly or indirectly, on a common platform. One characteristic that is shared by the largest and most successful open source projects, however, is a software architecture designed to promote anarchic collaboration through extensions while at the same time preserving centralized control over the interfaces. This talk features a survey of the state-of-the-practice in open source development in regards to software architecture, with particular emphasis on the modular extensibility interfaces within several of the most successful projects, including Apache httpd, Eclipse, Mozilla Firefox, Linux kernel, and the World Wide Web (which few people recognize as an open source project in itself). These projects fall under the general category of collaborative open source software development, which emphasizes community aspects of software engineering in order to compensate for the often-volunteer nature of core developers and take advantage of the scalability obtainable through Internet-based virtual organizations.},
	keywords = {apache, collaborative open source development, eclipse, extensibility, Firefox, linux, linux kernel, loose coupling, modularity, mozilla, open source, software architecture},
	isbn = {1-58113-963-2},
	doi = {10.1145/1062455.1062474},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1062455.1062474},
	author = {Roy T. Fielding}
}
@conference {782,
	title = {Towards Supporting Agile Practice Within The Libre Software Paradigm},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {303-304},
	abstract = {Individual agile methods have never been practiced as defined, in the same way that Royce{\textquoteright}s waterfall [1] model never reflected actual practice. Instead, practitioners adapted the core principles of these processes in order to suit their needs. Understanding this is key to appreciating the agile mindset. What does exist is a set of principles1 which, when followed loosely, form the agile practices. It is an important part of the agile mentality that the individuals within a project are more important that the process they follow. However, the individual methods do have their own identifying features that make them unique; for example testing must be performed before coding within eXtreme Programming (XP) [2]. However, if practitioners were to apply XP, exactly as Beck describes it, then they are probably not {\textquotedblleft}doing agile{\textquotedblright} as they may not be following the process that suits their needs best. One of the interesting features of the XP method is its requirement of a collocated team. Th...},
	keywords = {agile methods, agile practice, extreme programming, libre software, open source, XP},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/1546},
	author = {Adams, Paul and Boldyreff, Cornelia}
}
@conference {797,
	title = {Transfering Libre Software Development Practices to the Production of Educational Resources: the Edukalibre Project},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {341-348},
	abstract = {The transfer of methodologies common in libre (free, open source) sofware development to the domain of educational resources can radically change the way educational content is developed and used, enabling both educational practitioners and students to become actively involved in its creation and distribution. New software architectures and tools are needed to effectively support this process. This paper describes a platform aimed to support the creation of free, collaboratively constructed educational content on the web, which has been developed within the Edukalibre project. It provides easy access to core technologies: a control version system combined with conversion tools to produce several convenient formats for each document. Its modular architecture offers many different interfaces to the users. The Edukalibre platform is distributed as libre software.},
	keywords = {educational resources, information systems, open source, software development practices},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/1548},
	author = {Gonz{\'a}lez-Barahona, Jes{\'u}s M. and Chris Tebb and Vania Dimitrova and Chaparro, Diego and Romera, Teo}
}
@conference {783,
	title = {Unreliable Collaborators: Coordination in distributed volunteer teams},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {305-306},
	abstract = {Drawing together the interest, skills and resources of individuals to pursue productive activity is the cornerstone of wealth creation. Recently, new forms of productive activity have emerged that draw together highly motivated, often volunteer, participants to collaborate through low-cost information systems to produce high quality products that rival those produced by wealthy firms and markets. Examples include free (libr{\^A}{\textasciiacute}e) and open source software (FLOSS), such as Linux, and collaboratively edited texts, such as Wikipedia and the Open Directory. There is an opportunity to study these novel activities, to understand their organization, in order to both further their continued success and to assess whether and which of their novel organization techniques might be used in wider domains of human collaborative activity.},
	keywords = {coordination, floss organization, MOTIVATION, open source, volunteer teams},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/1552},
	author = {Howison, James}
}
@conference {778,
	title = {Using Plone To Support Collaborative Research},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {296-297},
	keywords = {collaboration environment, collaborative research, content management system, open source, plugin},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/1558},
	author = {Adams, Paul and Nutter, David and Rank, Stephen and Boldyreff, Cornelia}
}
@conference {799,
	title = {What is the significance of Open Source Software for the education and training community?},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {353-358},
	abstract = {There is growing interest in the education community in the development and use of Open Source Software. This paper explains the ideas behind OSS and how what its significance is for education. It examines regional and national initiatives to promote the use of OSS. The paper considers the advantages of OSS and potential problems. It goes on to look at the idea of open content and the sharing of learning content, and provides short case studies. The paper concludes that the major significance of OSS and open content is in the new social relations engendered and in fostering innovation in e-learning, both in application development and new pedagogies.},
	keywords = {economic issues, education, open source, pedagocic impact, training},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/1563},
	author = {Attwell, Graham}
}
@conference {77,
	title = {Do the Rich Get Richer? The Impact of Power Laws on Open Source Development Projects},
	booktitle = {2004 Open Source Conference (OSCON)},
	year = {2004},
	type = {conference presentation},
	address = {Portland, OR, USA},
	keywords = {open source, power law, social network analysis, sourceforge},
	author = {Conklin, Megan}
}
@proceedings {124,
	title = {Membership dynamics and network stability in the open-source community: the ising perspective},
	year = {2004},
	note = {"simulations with the empirical network data that were collected from two actual OSS communities, Linux and Hypermail."

"we initially downloaded nearly 100,000 archived (between 1997 and 2003) LINUX Kernel and Hypermail newsgroup messages posted in a UNIX mailbox format"

"Specific information was obtained regarding the characteristics of these two OSS communities, including the size, the number of average connections per participant, and the hierarchy of each community."},
	abstract = {In this paper, we address the following two questions: (1)How does a participant{\textquoteright}s membership decision affect the others (neighbors) with whom he has collaborated over an extended period of time in an open source software (OSS) network? (2) To what extent do network characteristics (i.e, size and connectivity) mediate the impact of external factors on the OSS participants{\textquoteright} dynamic membership decisions and hence the stability of the network? From the Ising perspective, we present fresh theoretical insight into the dynamic and reciprocal membership relations between OSS participants. We also performed simulations based on empirical data that were collected from two actual OSS communities. Some of the key findings include that (1) membership herding is highly present when the external force is weak, but decreases significantly when the force increases, (2) the propensity for membership herding is most likely to be seen in a large network with a random connectivity, and (3) for large networks, at low external force a random connectivity will perform better than a scale-free counterpart in terms of the network strength. However, as the temperature (external force) increases, the reverse phenomenon is observed. In addition, the scale-free connectivity appears to be less volatile than with the random connectivity in response to the increase in the temperature. We conclude with several implications that may be of significance to OSS stakeholders.},
	keywords = {email, email archive, hypermail, linux, mailing list, membership, membership herding, newsgroup, open source, participants, social network analysis, stakeholders, team size},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/OhJeon.pdf},
	author = {Oh, Wonseok and Jeon, Sangyong}
}
@article {flosswp77,
	title = {Guarding the Commons: How Community Managed Software Projects Protect Their Work},
	journal = {Research Policy},
	volume = {32},
	year = {2003},
	note = {"Data was collected from three primary sources: 1) observation at project and user group meetings, technical presentations and conferences; 2) informant interviews; and 3) project data archived on the Internet that detailed project interactions and structural developments."

"Project data was collected from online archives and included documents such as: mission statements, charters, bylaws, meeting minutes, and mailing list archives."},
	month = {February},
	pages = {1179-1198},
	edition = {7},
	abstract = {Theorists often speculate why open source and free software project contributors give their work away. Although contributors make their work publicly available, they do not forfeit their rights to it. Community managed software projects protect their work by using several legal and normative tactics, which should not be conflated with a disregard for or neglect of intellectual property rights. These tactics allow a project?s intellectual property to be publicly and freely available and yet, governable. Exploration of this seemingly contradictory state may provide new insight into governance models for the management of digital intellectual property.},
	keywords = {Common Pool Resources, email, email archives, intellectual property, mailing list, open source, Public Goods, Software, Survey},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/rp-omahony.pdf},
	author = {Siobhan O{\textquoteright}Mahony}
}
@proceedings {95,
	title = {Open source software in the trenches: Lessons from a large-scale OSS implementation},
	year = {2003},
	keywords = {open source},
	author = {Fitzgerald, Brian and Kenny, Tony}
}
@proceedings {74,
	title = {Survival of open-source projects: A population ecology perspective},
	year = {2003},
	keywords = {open source},
	author = {Chengalur-Smith, Shobha and Sidorova, Anna}
}
@conference {1161,
	title = {The Coming Software Revolution},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2nd ICSE Workshop on Open Source},
	year = {2002},
	abstract = {The growing adoption of collaborative software development will change the global software industry by altering its economics of scale, location, and price. The growth of non-proprietary code will depress prices in the proprietary sector, and the possession of source code will enable the growth of more software industrial centers around the world; their emergence will threaten the business of current leaders. National governments which see themselves as disadvantaged or even threatened by the current software powers will encourage collaborative software development and the services that this development model drives. Only world-wide draconic legislation by the current software powers has any hope of preserving the status quo.},
	keywords = {ECONOMICS, management, open source, politics},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/Rosenberg.pdf},
	author = {Rosenberg, D.K.}
}
@proceedings {140,
	title = {An exploratory study of ideology and trust in open source development groups},
	year = {2001},
	note = {"To do this, we scanned information in the public domain to develop a preliminary understanding of the context. We then identified 48 OS projects using www.sourceforge.net, an on-line open source meeting place that provides information on open source efforts and hosts code repositories. Projects were selected to represent a variety of types of software, licenses, and group sizes. We contacted administrators or project leaders and asked them to complete open-ended questionnaires regarding their experience and views on open source development."},
	abstract = {Open source (OS) software development has been the subject of heightened interest among organizational scholars because of the novel social coordination practices that signal a departure from traditional proprietary software development. We propose that trust among group members in open source development groups (OSDGs) plays a key role in facilitating their success. Trust is important in this context because of the risk of opportunistic behavior by other members who volunteers may not have met and may never expect to meet, as well as a lack of explicit market contracts or common organizational affiliation. The open source community is differentiated by a coherent ideology that emphasizes a distinct set of interrelated norms, beliefs, and values. These serve to create incentives for open source practices that eschew conventional transactional norms in favor of a gift culture and a focus on reputations. In this study, we primarily examine the role of the shared ideology in enabling the development of affective and cognitive trust in OSDGs. We further examine how this trust leads to desired outcomes - group efficacy and effectiveness. The study is based on exploratory interviews, examination of archival records and a preliminary survey to understand the specific conditions of open source efforts on which this work-in-progress report is based. This is being followed-up by empirical testing of our research model through a survey of a broad variety of OSDGs. This study would contribute to a clarification of the role of trust in enabling software groups to work effectively and help to understand the bases of trust in ideology-permeated groups.},
	keywords = {contributors, groups, ideology, license analysis, licenses, metadata, open source, sourceforge, Survey, team, team size, teams, trust, types},
	doi = {10.1.1.104.638},
	url = {http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.104.638\&rep=rep1\&type=pdf},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/stewartGosain2001.pdf},
	author = {Katherine Stewart and Gosain, S.}
}
@conference {1151,
	title = {Open Source Development: A suitable Method to introduce a standardized communication protocol?},
	booktitle = {1st Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering at ICSE 2001},
	year = {2001},
	abstract = {Open Source developments like telnet and Apache are very important for an extensive and compatible use of the TCP/IP and the HTTP protocol. Both contain features which rely on a compatible implementation of complex interactions between computers of different platform types. This can be successfully achieved with the help of Open Source.	Reconciliation	of	different interpretations of the standard, clarifications and extensions can be realised by discussion systems	and	some	generally	accepted conciliators of Open Source projects. As long as companies have a commercial interest in selling solutions based on the protocol, it makes economic sense for them to jointly support its common implementation. This paper examines the possibility to use an Open Source reference implementation of the agricultural communication protocols DIN 9684 [1] [2] and ISO 11783 to establish a capable and compatible implementation in agricultural mobile process control and data collection.},
	keywords = {communication protocol, DIN 9684, ISO 11783, open source},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/spangler.pdf},
	author = {Spangler, Achim}
}
