@article {1122,
	title = {Understanding the Motivations, Participation, and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects},
	journal = {Management Science},
	volume = {52},
	year = {2006},
	note = {"analyzing archival data collected from OSS project records over a period of four years"
"Apart from the source and binary codes of the actual software programs, Apache products include developer websites, change logs, documentation, and developer communications in the form of e-mail archives. From these products, we extracted two types of information: each contributor{\textquoteright}s progression along the Apache career path, and each contributor{\textquoteright}s source code contributions to the project."},
	month = {07/2006},
	pages = {984 - 999},
	abstract = {Understanding what motivates participation is a central theme in the research on open source software (OSS) development. Our study contributes by revealing how the different motivations of OSS developers are interrelated, how these motivations influence participation leading to performance, and how past performance influences subsequent motivations. Drawing on theories of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, we develop a theoretical model relating the motivations, participation, and performance of OSS developers. We evaluate our model using survey and archival data collected from a longitudinal field study of software developers in the Apache projects. Our results reveal several important findings. First, we find that developers{\textquoteright} motivations are not independent but rather are related in complex ways. Being paid to contribute to Apache projects is positively related to developers{\textquoteright} status motivations but negatively related to their use-value motivations. Perhaps surprisingly, we find no evidence of diminished intrinsic motivation in the presence of extrinsic motivations; rather, status motivations enhance intrinsic motivations. Second, we find that different motivations have an impact on participation in different ways. Developers{\textquoteright} paid participation and status motivations lead to above-average contribution levels, but use-value motivations lead to below-average contribution levels, and intrinsic motivations do not significantly impact average contribution levels. Third, we find that developers{\textquoteright} contribution levels positively impact their performance rankings. Finally, our results suggest that past-performance rankings enhance developers{\textquoteright} subsequent status motivations.},
	keywords = {apache, change logs, contributions, email, email archives, extrinsic motivation, intrinsic motivation, mailing lists, MOTIVATION, open source software, participation, software development performance, source code, status, Survey},
	issn = {1526-5501},
	doi = {10.1287/mnsc.1060.0554},
	author = {Roberts, Jeffrey A. and Il-Horn Hann and Slaughter, Sandra A.}
}
@proceedings {104,
	title = {Economic incentives for participating in open source software projects},
	year = {2002},
	note = {"The data for this research come from two primary sources: Apache project archives and a targeted survey of Apache participants. Archival data are open source project artifacts such as e-mail and source code archives, source code version control meta-data, and developer Web sites"
independent variables: patch, committer, work experience, programming experience, education, job switch, firm size, firm public, industry},
	pages = {365{\textendash}372},
	abstract = {Using the Internet as a basis for communication, collaboration, and storage of artifacts, the open source community is producing software of a quality that was previously thought to be achievable only by professional engineers following strict software development paradigms. This accomplishment is even more astounding as developers contribute to the source code without any remuneration. Open source leaders as well as academics have proposed theories about the motivation of open source developers that are rooted in diverse fields such as social psychology and anthropology. However, Lerner and Tirole (2000) argue that developer participation in open source projects may, in part, be explained by existing economic theory regarding career concerns. This research seeks to confirm or disconfirm the existence of economic returns to participation in open source development. Our findings suggest that greater open source participation per se, as measured in contributions made, is not associated with wage increases. However, a higher status in a merit-based ranking within the Apache Project is associated with significantly higher wages. This suggests that employers do not reward the gain in experience through open source participation as an increase in human capital. The results are also consistent with the notion that a high rank within the Apache Software Foundation is a credible signal of the productive capacity of a programmer.},
	keywords = {apache, contributions, email, email archives, mailing list, organizational sponsorship, participation, patch, scm, source code, Survey, version control},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/42.pdf},
	author = {Il-Horn Hann and Jeff Roberts and Sandra Slaughter and Roy Fielding}
}
@conference {1157,
	title = {Why Do Developers Contribute to Open Source Projects? First Evidence of Economic Incentives},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2nd ICSE Workshop on Open Source},
	year = {2002},
	note = {"The data for this research come from two primary sources: Apache project archives and a targeted survey of Apache participants. Archival data are open source project artifacts such as email and source code archives, source code version control meta-data and developer web sites."},
	abstract = {The availability of commercial quality, free software products such as the Apache HTTP (web) server or the Linux operating system has focused significant attention on the open source development process by which these products were created. One of the more perplexing aspects of open source software projects is why developers freely devote their time and energy to these projects. While many open source participants cite idealistic motives for participation, Lerner and Tirole (2000) argue that developer participation in open source projects may, in part, be explained by existing economic theory regarding career concerns. This research seeks to confirm or disconfirm the existence of economic returns to participation in open source development. Preliminary results of our empirical investigation suggest that greater open source participation per se, as measured in contributions made, does not lead to wage increases. However, a higher status in a merit-based ranking within the Apache Project does lead to significantly higher wages. This suggests that employers do not reward the gain in experience through open source participation as an increase in human capital. The results are also consistent with the notion that a high rank within the Apache Software Foundation is a credible signal of the productive capacity of a programmer.},
	keywords = {apache, contributions, cvs, developers, ECONOMICS, email, email archives, financial, Human capital, mailing list, MOTIVATION, participation, source code, version control},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/HannRobertsSlaughterFielding.pdf},
	author = {Il-Horn Hann and Jeff Roberts and Sandra Slaughter and Roy Fielding}
}
