@proceedings {1445,
	title = {Emerging Hackerspaces {\textendash} Peer-Production Generation},
	volume = {378},
	year = {2012},
	month = {09/2012},
	pages = {94-111},
	publisher = {IFIP AICT},
	abstract = {This paper describes a peer-production movement, the hackerspace movement, its members and values. The emergence of hackerspaces, fablabs and makerspaces is changing how hacker communities and other like-minded communities function. Thus, an understanding of the nature of hackerspaces helps in detailing the features of contemporary peer-production. Building on previous work on {\textquoteright}fabbing{\textquoteright}, two different sets of results are presented: (1) empirical observations from a longitudinal study of hackerspace participants; and (2) a theoretical description of hacker generations as a larger context in which peer-production can be located. With regard to (1), research data has been collected through prolonged observation of hackerspace communities and two surveys.},
	keywords = {COMMUNITY, fabbing, fablab, hackerspace, makerspace, MOTIVATION, movement, open source, peer-production, Survey, sustainability},
	author = {Moilanen, Jarkko}
}
@proceedings {1269,
	title = {What kind of commons is free software?},
	year = {2011},
	note = {Available under a CreativeCommons BY-NC-SA license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/). The presentation slides are also attached; paper{\textquoteright}s LaTeX source files can be found at http://www.mediafire.com/?7k9dxbkna0x6irl},
	month = {06/2011},
	address = {Berlin, Germany},
	abstract = {This paper analyzes free software under the light of commons theories, and tries to answer whether it is a managed or open access commons. It briefly presents commons studies and its main concepts, as well as the discussion on immaterial commons, arguing that goods{\textquoteright} intrinsic characteristics should not be viewed as absolute, but rather contextualized in social struggles. Then, it proposes a two-tier structure for analyzing free software as a commons, considering its dual nature as source and machine code. The two connected layers of the proposal - use and development - are characterized according to commons theory categories; Android and software forking are explored as examples. It concludes that the first layer resembles an open access commons, but with intensional boundaries, and that the second one resembles multiple managed commons. This disparity is associated with the category of nested enterprises and with the layers{\textquoteright} relations to appropriation and production.},
	keywords = {commons, COMMUNITY, free software, governance},
	issn = {1613-0073},
	url = {http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-739/paper_10.pdf},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/VIEIRA.pdf , https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/VIEIRA_presentation_0.odp},
	author = {Vieira, Miguel Said}
}
@article {1120,
	title = {The institutions of open source software: Examining the Debian community*},
	journal = {Information Economics and Policy},
	volume = {20},
	year = {2008},
	note = {"using primary data from its mailing lists archives, handbooks written to inform potential and actual community members, and previous analyses of institutional evolution and political conflict"

no discussion of which lists, how many, or when they were gathered...?[ms]},
	month = {12/2008},
	pages = {333 - 344},
	abstract = {Free and open source software activities involve and, perhaps, evolve institutions (rules, norms and standards) that influence the formation, growth, and demise of communities. Community institutions are attractors for some individuals while discouraging other individuals from entering or continuing to participate. Their suitability may change as a community grows. This paper examines the institutions of the Debian community where issues of community identity, distribution of authority, and decentralisation have facilitated growth and development. These same institutions have also resulted in conflicts regarding community purposes and the quality and delivery of the community{\textquoteright}s output. We examine the institutional redesign undertaken to address these problems and derive implications for F/LOS communities and companies.},
	keywords = {authority, COMMUNITY, conflict, debian, decentralization, growth, institutions, leadership},
	issn = {01676245},
	doi = {10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.06.001},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/The_institutions_of_open_source_software-_IR.pdf},
	author = {Mateos Garcia, J. and Steinmueller, W.E.}
}
@article {119,
	title = {Social network structures in open source software development teams},
	journal = {Journal of Database Management},
	volume = {18},
	number = {2},
	year = {2007},
	note = {"Three projects were selected from SourceForge.net in terms of their similarities as well as their differences. Monthly data were extracted from the bug tracking systems in order to achieve a longitudinal view of the interaction pattern of each project. Social network analysis was used to generate the indices of social structure."

no pdf},
	month = {Apr-Jun},
	pages = {25-40},
	abstract = {Drawing on social network theories and previous studies, this research examines the dynamics of social network structures in open source software (OSS) teams. Three projects were selected from SourceForge.net in terms of their similarities as well as their differences. Monthly data were extracted from the bug tracking systems in order to achieve a longitudinal view of the interaction pattern of each project. Social network analysis was used to generate the indices of social structure. The finding suggests that the interaction pattern of OSS projects evolves from a single hub at the beginning to a corel periphery model as the projects move forward.},
	keywords = {bug tracking, bugs, COMMUNITY, INNOVATION, longitudinal study, MODEL, open source, social, social network analysis, social networks, sourceforge, structure},
	isbn = {1063-8016},
	author = {Long, Y. and Siau, K.}
}
@conference {689,
	title = {Evolution of Open Source Communities},
	booktitle = {OSS2006: Open Source Systems (IFIP 2.13)},
	series = {IFIP International Federation for Information Processing},
	year = {2006},
	note = {"we took snapshots of its membership at regular intervals"
"we chose a one year period"
"we retrieve the list of core developers ordered by their number of inbound messages, as noted above."},
	pages = {21 - 32},
	publisher = {Springer},
	organization = {Springer},
	abstract = {The goal of this paper is to document the evolution of a portfolio of related open source communities over time. As a case study, we explore the subprojects of the Apache project, one of the largest and most visible open source projects. We extract the community structure from the mailing list data, and study how the subcommunities evolve, and are interrelated over time. Our analysis leads us to propose the following hypotheses about the growth of open source communities: (1) communities add new developers by a process of preferential attachment; (2) links between existing communities are also subject to preferential attachment; (3) developers will migrate between communities together with other collaborators; and (4) information flow follows project dependencies. In particular, we are concerned with the underlying factors that motivate the migration between communities, such as information flow, co-worker ties, and project dependencies.
},
	keywords = {apache, COMMUNITY, core, developers, email, email archives, mailing list, membership},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34226-5_3},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/Evolution\%20of\%20Open\%20Source\%20Communities.pdf},
	author = {Weiss, Michael and Moroiu, Gabriella and Zhao, Ping}
}
@article {flosswp113,
	title = {The Impact of Ideology on Effectiveness in Open Source Software Development Teams},
	journal = {MIS Quarterly},
	volume = {30},
	number = {2},
	year = {2006},
	note = {"...we collected data related to OSS projects hosted on Sourceforge (www.sourceforge.net)."
"Data was collected using two surveys and from the Sourceforge website."
},
	month = {2006},
	pages = {291-314},
	abstract = {The emerging work on understanding open source software has argued for the importance of understanding what leads to effectiveness in OSS development teams and has pointed to the importance of ideology. This paper develops a framework of the OSS ideology (including specific norms, beliefs, and values) and a theoretical model to show how adherence to components of the ideology impact effectiveness in OSS teams. The model is based on the idea that ideology provides clan control, which is important in OSS development settings because OSS teams generally lack formal behavioral and outcome controls. The paper hypothesizes both direct effects of ideology on OSS team effectiveness and indirect effects via influences on affective trust, cognitive trust, and communication quality. Hypotheses are tested using survey and objective data on OSS projects. Four effectiveness measures are used to capture unique aspects of effectiveness in OSS including both the extent to which a team attracts input from the community and the team{\textquoteright}s success in accomplishing project outcomes. Results support the main thesis that OSS team members{\textquoteright} adherence to the tenets of the OSS community ideology enhances OSS team effectiveness. The study uncovers several differences in the importance of OSS norms, beliefs, and values to different kinds of OSS team effectiveness and discusses implications for theory and practice.},
	keywords = {bug fixing, bug reports, bug tracking, communication, COMMUNITY, effectiveness, feature requests, ideology, metadata, sourceforge, Survey, team effort, team size, trust},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/stewartgosain2.pdf},
	author = {Stewart, K. and Gosain, S.}
}
@conference {795,
	title = {The challenges of creating open source education software: the Gild experience},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {338-340},
	keywords = {COMMUNITY, eclipse, learning environment, novice programmers, open source, programming environment},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/1539},
	author = {Daniel M. German and Rigby, Peter and Cubranic, Davor and Storey, Margaret-Anne and Thomson, Suzanne}
}
@conference {803,
	title = {Open Source firms: from community to business},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {362-363},
	abstract = {A large body of literature is now addressing the Open Source (OS) phenomenon. Economic scholars have deeply investigated the incentives of people working within OS community projects; the software production models in absence of explicit hierarchical structures; the successful dissemination of OS programs in environments dominated by proprietary standards; the peculiarities in the management of intellectual property within the OS framework. Theoretical contributions have coupled with the collection of extensive empirical evidence mainly through surveys taken on individual developers. Nowadays a new trend is shaping the OS movement: more and more firms are entering the market by offering software solutions based on the new paradigm (Open Source firms).},
	keywords = {business, COMMUNITY, firms, Open Source firms},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/1265},
	author = {Andrea Bonaccorsi and Cristina Rossi}
}
@conference {Ye:2003:TUM:776816.776867,
	title = {Toward an understanding of the motivation Open Source Software developers},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering},
	series = {ICSE {\textquoteright}03},
	year = {2003},
	note = {"Analyzing the emails sent to the mailing fist is one way of understanding the structure of the community."
"Table 2 displays the number of code contributions made by members to the GIMP system and the defined roles of those contributing members. We counted the number of contributions made by each person by analyzing the change log of the system."},
	pages = {419{\textendash}429},
	publisher = {IEEE Computer Society},
	organization = {IEEE Computer Society},
	address = {Washington, DC, USA},
	abstract = {An Open Source Software (OSS) project is unlikely to be successful unless there is an accompanied community that provides the platform for developers and users to collaborate. Members of such communities are volunteers whose motivation to participate and contribute is of essential importance to the success of OSS projects. In this paper, we aim to create an understanding of what motivates people to participate in OSS communities. We theorize that learning is one of the motivational forces. Our theory is grounded in the learning theory of Legitimate Peripheral Participation, and is supported by analyzing the social structure of OSS communities and the co-evolution between OSS systems and communities. We also discuss practical implications of our theory for creating and maintaining sustainable OSS communities as well as for software engineering research and education.},
	keywords = {change log, COMMUNITY, contributions, contributors, developers, email, email archives, evolution, gimp, log files, mailing list, roles, source code},
	isbn = {0-7695-1877-X},
	url = {http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=776816.776867},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/YeKishida.pdf},
	author = {Ye, Yunwen and Kishida, Kouichi}
}
