@proceedings {1903,
	title = {Release Early, Release Often and Release on Time. An Empirical Case Study of Release Management},
	volume = {496},
	year = {2017},
	month = {05/2017},
	pages = {167-181},
	publisher = {Springer},
	abstract = {The dictum of {\textquotedblleft}Release early, release often.{\textquotedblright} by Eric Raymond as the Linux modus operandi highlights the importance of release management in open source software development. Nevertheless, there are very few empirical studies addressing release management in open source software development. It is already known that most open source software communities adopt either feature-based or time-based release strategies. Each of these has its advantages and disadvantages that are context-specific. Recent research reported that many prominent open source software projects have moved from feature-based to time-based releases. In this longitudinal case study, we narrate how OpenStack shifted towards a liberal six-month release cycle. If prior research discussed why projects should adopt time-based releases and how they can adopt such a strategy, we discuss how OpenStack adapted its software development processes, its organizational design and its tools toward a hybrid release management strategy {\textemdash} a strive for balancing the benefits and drawbacks of feature-based and time-based release strategies.},
	keywords = {openstack, release management},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-57735-7_16},
	url = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-57735-7_16},
	author = {Teixeira, Jose}
}
@conference {1216,
	title = {Experiences Mining Open Source Release Histories},
	booktitle = {International Conference on Software and Systems Process (ICSSP 2011) },
	year = {2011},
	note = {"First, we selected the projects to initially target, using several criteria to get a broad picture of the open source landscape. Second, we collected the actual data, using a framework of parsers and some manual inspection. Third, we standardized and inserted the data into a database for later use."

"but we plan to eventually cross reference our list of projects with existing open source project information (such as FLOSSmole) to take advantage of the work already done by other researchers."

"For each release, we collected the following data: the project it belonged to, the date the release was published, the type of release, the release label (version number) and the source of the data"

discussion of their difficulties

"We conclude that programmatically creating a release history database from existing open source data is not trivial,"

"We have currently collected 1579 distinct releases from 22 different open source projects"},
	month = {05/2011},
	abstract = {Software releases form a critical part of the life cycle of a software project. Typically, each project produces releases in its own way, using various methods of versioning, archiving, announcing and publishing the release. Understanding the release history of a software project can shed light on the project history, as well as the release process used by that project, and how those processes change. However, many factors make automating the retrieval of release history information difficult, such as the many sources of data, a lack of relevant standards and a disparity of tools used to create releases.

In spite of the large amount of raw data available, no attempt has been made to create a release history database of a large number of projects in the open source ecosystem. This paper presents our experiences, including the tools, techniques and pitfalls, in our early work to create a software release history database which will be of use to future researchers who want to study and model the release engineering process in greater depth.},
	keywords = {doap, flossmole cited, life cycle, release engineering, release history, release management, releases},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/icssp11short-p034-tsay.pdf},
	author = {Jason Tsay and Wright, Hyrum and Perry, Dewayne}
}
@conference {785,
	title = {Quality Improvement in Volunteer Free Software Projects: Exploring the Impact of Release Management},
	booktitle = {OSS2005: Open Source Systems },
	year = {2005},
	pages = {309-310},
	abstract = {Even though free software has achieved great popularity and success in recent years, there are a number of product quality challenges facing the open source development model. There is significant room for further quality improvement and one area that deserves special attention is release management. This research will identify problems with current release practices, verify possible advantages of an increasingly popular release model, and develop interventions to improve release management in free software projects. The research also aims to answer the fundamental question as to how volunteer projects can deliver predictable and high quality software.},
	keywords = {free software, open source, process improvement, quality assurance, release management, volunteer projects},
	url = {http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/1429},
	author = {Martin Michlmayr}
}
