@inbook {1615,
	title = {An Exploration of Code Quality in FOSS Projects},
	booktitle = {Open Source Software: Mobile Open Source Technologies},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology},
	volume = {427},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {181-190},
	publisher = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	organization = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	abstract = {

It is a widely held belief that Free/Open Source Software (FOSS) development leads to the creation of software with the same, if not higher quality compared to that created using proprietary software development models. However there is little research on evaluating the quality of FOSS code, and the impact of project characteristics such as age, number of core developers, code-base size, etc. In this exploratory study, we examined 110 FOSS projects, measuring the quality of the code and architectural design using code smells. We found that, contrary to our expectations, the overall quality of the code is not affected by the size of the code base, but that it was negatively impacted by the growth of the number of code contributors. Our results also show that projects with more core developers don{\textquoteright}t necessarily have better code quality.
},
	keywords = {Code Quality, FOSS, open source software, success metrics},
	isbn = {978-3-642-55127-7},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-55128-4_26},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55128-4_26},
	author = {Ahmed, Iftekhar and Ghorashi, Soroush and Jensen, Carlos},
	editor = {Corral, Luis and Sillitti, Alberto and Succi, Giancarlo and Vlasenko, Jelena and Wasserman, AnthonyI.}
}
@article {1414,
	title = {Competition and production of digital public goods},
	journal = {International Journal of Intelligent Control and Systems},
	volume = {14},
	number = {1},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {77-86},
	chapter = {77},
	abstract = {With the Internet has come the phenomenon of people volunteering to work on digital public goods such as open source software and online encyclopedia articles. Presumably, the success of individual public goods has an effect on attracting volunteers. However, the definition of success is ill-defined. This paper explores the impact of different success metrics on a simple public goods model. The findings show that the different success metrics considered do have an impact on the behavior of the model, with the largest differences being between consumer-oriented and producer-oriented metrics. This indicates that many proposed success metrics may be mapped into one of these two categories and within a category, all success metrics measure the same phenomenon. We argue that the characteristics of producer-oriented metrics more closely match real world phenomena, indicating that public goods are driven by producer, and not consumer, interests.},
	keywords = {digital public goods, FLOSS, open source software, sourceforge, success metrics, wikipedia},
	url = {http://www.public.asu.edu/~majansse/pubs/ijics2009.pdf},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/ijics2009.pdf},
	author = {Radtke, Nicholas P. and Janssen, Marco A.}
}
