@conference {572,
	title = {Design Evolution of an Open Source Project Using an Improved Modularity Metric},
	booktitle = {OSS2009: Open Source Ecosystems: Diverse Communities Interacting (IFIP 2.13)},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology },
	volume = {299/2009},
	year = {2009},
	month = {2009///},
	pages = {20 - 33},
	publisher = {Springer},
	organization = {Springer},
	chapter = {4},
	abstract = {Modularity of an open source software code base has been associated with community growth, incentives for voluntary contribution, and a reduction in free riding. As a theoretical construct, it links open source software to other domains of research, including organization theory, the economics of industry structure, and new product development; however, measuring the modularity of an open source software design has proven difficult, especially for large and complex systems. Building on previous work on Design Structure Matrices (DSMs), this paper describes two contributions towards a method for examining the evolving modularity of large-scale software systems: (1) an algorithm and new modularity metric for comparing code bases of different size; and (2) evolution analysis of Apache Tomcat to illustrate the insights gained from this approach. Over a ten-year period, the modularity of Tomcat continually increased, except in three instances: with each major change to the architecture or implementation, modularity first declined, then increased in the subsequent version to fully compensate for the decline.
},
	issn = {978-3-642-02031-5},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02032-2_4},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/Design\%20Evolution\%20of\%20an\%20Open\%20Source\%20Project.pdf},
	author = {Milev, Roberto and Muegge, Steven and Weiss, Michael}
}
@conference {640,
	title = {Free/Open Services: Conceptualization, Classification, and Commercialization},
	booktitle = {OSS2007: Open Source Development, Adoption and Innovation (IFIP 2.13)},
	series = {IFIP International Federation for Information Processing },
	volume = {234/2007},
	year = {2007},
	month = {2007///},
	pages = {253 - 258},
	publisher = {Springer},
	organization = {Springer},
	chapter = {24},
	abstract = {The concept of Free/Open Services (F/O-Services) emerges by bringing together services with Free/Open Source Software (FOSS). F/O-Services enable the creation of transparent composite services collectively and allow people and other services to access them. This paper extends the concept of F/O-Services beyond the level of open interfaces, analyzing the associated licensing interpretations and exploring the notion of open service dependencies. Further, the paper overviews the business models for F/O-Services as a part of this social mechanism of exchange.
},
	issn = {978-0-387-72485-0},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72486-7_24},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/Free\%20Open\%20Services.pdf},
	author = {Gangadharan, G. and D{\textquoteright}Andrea, Vincenzo and Weiss, Michael}
}
@conference {689,
	title = {Evolution of Open Source Communities},
	booktitle = {OSS2006: Open Source Systems (IFIP 2.13)},
	series = {IFIP International Federation for Information Processing},
	year = {2006},
	note = {"we took snapshots of its membership at regular intervals"
"we chose a one year period"
"we retrieve the list of core developers ordered by their number of inbound messages, as noted above."},
	pages = {21 - 32},
	publisher = {Springer},
	organization = {Springer},
	abstract = {The goal of this paper is to document the evolution of a portfolio of related open source communities over time. As a case study, we explore the subprojects of the Apache project, one of the largest and most visible open source projects. We extract the community structure from the mailing list data, and study how the subcommunities evolve, and are interrelated over time. Our analysis leads us to propose the following hypotheses about the growth of open source communities: (1) communities add new developers by a process of preferential attachment; (2) links between existing communities are also subject to preferential attachment; (3) developers will migrate between communities together with other collaborators; and (4) information flow follows project dependencies. In particular, we are concerned with the underlying factors that motivate the migration between communities, such as information flow, co-worker ties, and project dependencies.
},
	keywords = {apache, COMMUNITY, core, developers, email, email archives, mailing list, membership},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34226-5_3},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/Evolution\%20of\%20Open\%20Source\%20Communities.pdf},
	author = {Weiss, Michael and Moroiu, Gabriella and Zhao, Ping}
}
