@book {1531,
	title = {Is It All Lost? A Study of Inactive Open Source Projects},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology Open Source Software: Quality Verification },
	volume = {404},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {61 - 79},
	publisher = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	organization = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	address = {Berlin, Heidelberg},
	abstract = {
Open Source Software (OSS) proponents suggest that when developers lose interest in their project, their last duty is to {\textquotedblleft}hand it off to a competent successor.{\textquotedblright} However, the mechanisms of such a hand-off are not clear, or widely known among OSS developers. As a result, many OSS projects, after a certain long period of evolution, stop evolving, in fact becoming {\textquotedblleft}inactive{\textquotedblright} or {\textquotedblleft}abandoned{\textquotedblright} projects. This paper presents an analysis of the population of projects contained within one of the largest OSS repositories available (SourceForge.net), in order to describe how projects abandoned by their developers can be identified, and to discuss the attributes and characteristics of these inactive projects. In particular, the paper attempts to differentiate projects that experienced maintainability issues from those that are inactive for other reasons, in order to be able to correlate common characteristics to the {\textquotedblleft}failure{\textquotedblright} of these projects.
},
	keywords = {sourceforge},
	isbn = {978-3-642-38928-3},
	issn = {1868-422X},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-38928-3_5},
	url = {http://staff.lero.ie/stol/files/2013/03/2013-Is-It-All-Lost-A-Study-of-Inactive-Open-Source-Projects.pdf},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/2013-Is-It-All-Lost-A-Study-of-Inactive-Open-Source-Projects.pdf},
	author = {Khondu, Jymit and Capiluppi, Andrea and Stol, Klaas},
	editor = {Petrinja, Etiel and Succi, Giancarlo and Ioini, Nabil and Sillitti, Alberto}
}
@article {Beecher2009739,
	title = {Identifying exogenous drivers and evolutionary stages in FLOSS projects},
	journal = {Journal of Systems and Software},
	volume = {82},
	number = {5},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {739 - 750},
	abstract = {The success of a Free/Libre/Open Source Software (FLOSS) project has been evaluated in the past through the number of commits made to its configuration management system, number of developers and number of users. Most studies, based on a popular FLOSS repository (SourceForge), have concluded that the vast majority of projects are failures. This study{\textquoteright}s empirical results confirm and expand conclusions from an earlier and more limited work. Not only do projects from different repositories display different process and product characteristics, but a more general pattern can be observed. Projects may be considered as early inceptors in highly visible repositories, or as established projects within desktop-wide projects, or finally as structured parts of FLOSS distributions. These three possibilities are formalized into a framework of transitions between repositories. The framework developed here provides a wider context in which results from FLOSS repository mining can be more effectively presented. Researchers can draw different conclusions based on the overall characteristics studied about an Open Source software project{\textquoteright}s potential for success, depending on the repository that they mine. These results also provide guidance to OSS developers when choosing where to host their project and how to distribute it to maximize its evolutionary success.},
	keywords = {developers, forge, forges, repositories, repository, scm, software repositories, sourceforge, success, users},
	issn = {0164-1212},
	doi = {DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.10.026},
	url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V0N-4TVTJFS-1/2/e32ecee1bcb54bd4a5dff6d5e3daca8d},
	author = {Karl Beecher and Capiluppi, Andrea and Boldyreff, Cornelia}
}
