@conference {Eckhardt:2014:MMO:2642803.2642810,
	title = {The Merits of a Meritocracy in Open Source Software Ecosystems},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2014 European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops},
	series = {ECSAW {\textquoteright}14},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {7:1{\textendash}7:6},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {The Eclipse open source ecosystem has grown from a small internal IBM project to one of the biggest Integrated Development Environments in the market. Open source communities and ecosystems do not follow the standard governance strategies typically used in large organizations. A meritocracy is a frequently occurring form of governance on different levels in open ecosystems. In this paper we investigate how this form of governance influences the health of projects within the Eclipse ecosystem in terms of the amount of commits within each month. We analyzed the hierarchy of Eclipse, how merits are conceptualized within the ecosystem and the effect of the appointments of mentors and project leads on the amount of commits. From our research, we can conclude that this system is not always as fair as it seems; merits are only a benefit in some cases.},
	keywords = {Ecosystem Health, Meritocracy, open source, Software ecosystems},
	isbn = {978-1-4503-2778-7},
	doi = {10.1145/2642803.2642810},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2642803.2642810},
	author = {Eckhardt, Evert and Kaats, Erwin and Slinger Jansen and Alves, Carina}
}
