@inbook {Poo-Caama{\~n}o2016,
	title = {Herding Cats: A Case Study of Release Management in an Open Collaboration Ecosystem},
	booktitle = {Open Source Systems: Integrating Communities: 12th IFIP WG 2.13 International Conference, OSS 2016, Gothenburg, Sweden, May 30 - June 2, 2016, Proceedings},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {147{\textendash}162},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	organization = {Springer International Publishing},
	chapter = {Herding Cats: A Case Study of Release Management in an Open Collaboration Ecosystem},
	address = {Cham},
	abstract = {Release management in large-scale software development projects requires significant communication and coordination. It is particularly challenging in Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) ecosystems, in which hundreds of loosely connected developers and their projects need to be coordinated to release software to a schedule. To better understand this process and its challenges, we analyzed over two and half years of communication in the GNOME ecosystem and studied developers{\textquoteright} interactions. We cataloged communication channels, categorized high level communication and coordination activities in one of them, and triangulated our results by interviewing developers. We found that a release schedule, influence instead of direct control, and diversity are factors that impact positively the release process in the GNOME ecosystem. Our results can help organizations build better large-scale teams and show that research focused on individual projects might miss important parts of the picture.
},
	isbn = {978-3-319-39225-7},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-39225-7_12},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39225-7_12},
	author = {Poo-Caama{\~n}o, Germ{\'a}n and Singer, Leif and Knauss, Eric and Daniel M. German},
	editor = {Kevin Crowston and Hammouda, Imed and Lundell, Bj{\"o}rn and Gregorio Robles and Gamalielsson, Jonas and Juho Lindman}
}
@article {1796,
	title = {An in-depth study of the promises and perils of mining GitHub},
	journal = {Empirical Software Engineering},
	year = {2015},
	publisher = {Springer},
	abstract = {With over 10 million git repositories, GitHub is becoming one of the most important sources of software artifacts on the Internet. Researchers mine the information stored in GitHub{\textquoteright}s event logs to understand how its users employ the site to collaborate on software, but so far there have been no studies describing the quality and properties of the available GitHub data. We document the results of an empirical study aimed at understanding the characteristics of the repositories and users in GitHub; we see how users take advantage of GitHub{\textquoteright}s main features and how their activity is tracked on GitHub and related datasets to point out misalignment between the real and mined data. Our results indicate that while GitHub is a rich source of data on software development, mining GitHub for research purposes should take various potential perils into consideration. For example, we show that the majority of the projects are personal and inactive, and that almost 40\% of all pull requests do not appear as merged even though they were. Also, approximately half of GitHub{\textquoteright}s registered users do not have public activity, while the activity of GitHub users in repositories is not always easy to pinpoint. We use our identified perils to see if they can pose validity threats; we review selected papers from the MSR 2014 Mining Challenge and see if there are potential impacts to consider. We provide a set of recommendations for software engineering researchers on how to approach the data in GitHub.},
	keywords = {github},
	issn = {1573-7616},
	doi = {10.1007/s10664-015-9393-5},
	url = {http://www.gousios.gr/pub/promises-perils-github-extended.pdf},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/promises-perils-github-extended.pdf},
	author = {Kalliamvakou, Eirini and Gousios, Georgios and Blincoe, Kelly and Singer, Leif and Daniel M. German and Damian, Daniela}
}
@conference {Kalliamvakou:2014:PPM:2597073.2597074,
	title = {The Promises and Perils of Mining GitHub},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories},
	series = {MSR 2014},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {92{\textendash}101},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {With over 10 million git repositories, GitHub is becoming one of the most important source of software artifacts on the Internet. Researchers are starting to mine the information stored in GitHub{\textquoteright}s event logs, trying to understand how its users employ the site to collaborate on software. However, so far there have been no studies describing the quality and properties of the data available from GitHub. We document the results of an empirical study aimed at understanding the characteristics of the repositories in GitHub and how users take advantage of GitHub{\textquoteright}s main features---namely commits, pull requests, and issues. Our results indicate that, while GitHub is a rich source of data on software development, mining GitHub for research purposes should take various potential perils into consideration. We show, for example, that the majority of the projects are personal and inactive; that GitHub is also being used for free storage and as a Web hosting service; and that almost 40\% of all pull requests do not appear as merged, even though they were. We provide a set of recommendations for software engineering researchers on how to approach the data in GitHub.
},
	keywords = {bias, code reviews, git, github, mining software repositories},
	isbn = {978-1-4503-2863-0},
	doi = {10.1145/2597073.2597074},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2597073.2597074},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/perils.pdf},
	author = {Kalliamvakou, Eirini and Gousios, Georgios and Blincoe, Kelly and Singer, Leif and Daniel M. German and Damian, Daniela}
}
