@proceedings {1491,
	title = {Communication in Open Source Software Development Mailing Lists},
	year = {2013},
	note = {"The entire dataset used in the experiment, including the cards, the resolved aliases, and detailed statistical results, can be downloaded from ..." http://www.st.ewi.tudelft.nl/~guzzi/oss-communication/},
	month = {05/2013},
	pages = {277-286},
	abstract = {Open source software (OSS) development teams use
electronic means, such as emails, instant messaging, or forums,
to conduct open and public discussions. Researchers investigated
mailing lists considering them as a hub for project communication. Prior work focused on specific aspects of emails, for example
the handling of patches, traceability concerns, or social networks.
This led to insights pertaining to the investigated aspects, but not
to a comprehensive view of what developers communicate about.
Our objective is to increase the understanding of development
mailing lists communication.
We quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed a sample of 506
email threads from the development mailing list of a major OSS
project, Lucene. Our investigation reveals that implementation
details are discussed only in about 35\% of the threads, and that
a range of other topics is discussed. Moreover, core developers
participate in less than 75\% of the threads. We observed that the
development mailing list is not the main player in OSS project
communication, as it also includes other channels such as the
issue repository.},
	keywords = {email, lucene, mailling list},
	url = {http://www.st.ewi.tudelft.nl/~guzzi/downloads/Guzzi2013msr.pdf},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/Guzzi2013msr.pdf},
	author = {Guzzi, Anja and Bacchelli, Alberto and Lanza, Michele and Pinzger, Martin and van Deursen, Arie}
}
@conference {950,
	title = {An extensive comparison of bug prediction approaches},
	booktitle = {2010 7th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2010)2010 7th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2010)},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {31 - 41},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	organization = {IEEE},
	address = {Cape Town, South Africa},
	abstract = {Reliably predicting software defects is one of software engineering{\textquoteright}s holy grails. Researchers have devised and implemented a plethora of bug prediction approaches varying in terms of accuracy, complexity and the input data they require. However, the absence of an established benchmark makes it hard, if not impossible, to compare approaches. We present a benchmark for defect prediction, in the form of a publicly available data set consisting of several software systems, and provide an extensive comparison of the explanative and predictive power of well-known bug prediction approaches, together with novel approaches we devised. Based on the results, we discuss the performance and stability of the approaches with respect to our benchmark and deduce a number of insights on bug prediction models.},
	keywords = {apache, bug reports, eclipse, famix, lucene, mylyn, prediction, scm},
	isbn = {978-1-4244-6802-7},
	doi = {10.1109/MSR.2010.5463279},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/31dambrosLanzaRobbes31.pdf},
	author = {D{\textquoteright}Ambros, Marco and Lanza, Michele and Robbes, Romain}
}
@conference {973,
	title = {On the relation of refactorings and software defect prediction},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2008 international workshop on Mining software repositories  - MSR {\textquoteright}08},
	year = {2008},
	month = {05/2008},
	pages = {35-38},
	publisher = {ACM Press},
	organization = {ACM Press},
	address = {New York, New York, USA},
	abstract = {This paper analyzes the influence of evolution activities such as refactoring on software defects. In a case study of five open source projects we used attributes of software evolution to predict defects in time periods of six months. We use versioning and issue tracking systems to extract 110 data mining features, which are separated into refactoring and non-refactoring related features. These features are used as input into classification algorithms that create prediction models for software defects. We found out that refactoring related features as well as non-refactoring related features lead to high quality prediction models. Additionally, we discovered that refactorings and defects have an inverse correlation: The number of software defects decreases, if the number of refactorings increased in the preceding time period. As a result, refactoring should be a significant part of both bug fixes and other evolutionary changes to reduce software defects.},
	keywords = {argouml, bug fixing, bug reports, defects, evolution, jboss, liferay, prediction, refactoring, spring, weka, xdoclet},
	isbn = {9781605580241},
	doi = {10.1145/1370750.1370759},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/p35-ratzinger.pdf},
	author = {Sigmund, Thomas and Gall, Harald C. and Ratzinger, Jacek}
}
@conference {D{\textquoteright}Ambros:2006:AER:1137983.1138029,
	title = {Applying the evolution radar to PostgreSQL},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Mining software repositories},
	series = {MSR {\textquoteright}06},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {177{\textendash}178},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	keywords = {cvs, documentation, evolution, evolution radar, logical coupling, makefile, mining challenge, msr challenge, postgresql, re-engineering, refactoring, release history, rhdb, source code, version control, visualization},
	isbn = {1-59593-397-2},
	doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1137983.1138029},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1137983.1138029},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/177ApplyingEvolution.pdf},
	author = {D{\textquoteright}Ambros, Marco and Lanza, Michele}
}
@conference {D{\textquoteright}Ambros:2006:ERV:1137983.1137992,
	title = {The evolution radar: visualizing integrated logical coupling information},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Mining software repositories},
	series = {MSR {\textquoteright}06},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {26{\textendash}32},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	abstract = {In software evolution research logical coupling has extensively been used to recover the hidden dependencies between source code artifacts. They would otherwise go lost because of the file-based nature of current versioning systems. Previous research has dealt with low-level couplings between files, leading to an explosion of data to be analyzed, or has abstracted the logical couplings to module level, leading to a loss of detailed information. In this paper we propose a visualization-based approach which integrates both file-level and module-level logical coupling information. This not only facilitates an in-depth analysis of the logical couplings at all granularity levels, it also leads to a precise characterization of the system modules in terms of their logical coupling dependencies.},
	keywords = {change management, cvs, evolution, logical coupling, mozilla, scm, source code, thunderbird, tinderbox, visualization},
	isbn = {1-59593-397-2},
	doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1137983.1137992},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1137983.1137992},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/26TheEvolutionRadar.pdf},
	author = {D{\textquoteright}Ambros, Marco and Lanza, Michele and Lungu, Mircea}
}
