@conference {950,
	title = {An extensive comparison of bug prediction approaches},
	booktitle = {2010 7th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2010)2010 7th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2010)},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {31 - 41},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	organization = {IEEE},
	address = {Cape Town, South Africa},
	abstract = {Reliably predicting software defects is one of software engineering{\textquoteright}s holy grails. Researchers have devised and implemented a plethora of bug prediction approaches varying in terms of accuracy, complexity and the input data they require. However, the absence of an established benchmark makes it hard, if not impossible, to compare approaches. We present a benchmark for defect prediction, in the form of a publicly available data set consisting of several software systems, and provide an extensive comparison of the explanative and predictive power of well-known bug prediction approaches, together with novel approaches we devised. Based on the results, we discuss the performance and stability of the approaches with respect to our benchmark and deduce a number of insights on bug prediction models.},
	keywords = {apache, bug reports, eclipse, famix, lucene, mylyn, prediction, scm},
	isbn = {978-1-4244-6802-7},
	doi = {10.1109/MSR.2010.5463279},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/31dambrosLanzaRobbes31.pdf},
	author = {D{\textquoteright}Ambros, Marco and Lanza, Michele and Robbes, Romain}
}
@conference {1358,
	title = {Extracting source code from e-mails},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of ICPC 2010 (18th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension)},
	year = {2010},
	note = {"We want to extract source code fragments from e-mail messages. To do this, we first need to select e-mails that contain source code fragments, and then we extract such fragments from the content in which they are enclosed."

"we manually build a statistically significant benchmark taking sample e- mails from five unrelated open source Java software systems."

},
	pages = {24-33},
	abstract = {E-mails, used by developers and system users to communicate over a broad range of topics, offer a valuable source of information. If archived, e-mails can be mined to support program comprehension activities and to provide views of a software system that are alternative and complementary to those offered by the source code.

However, e-mails are written in natural language, and therefore contain noise that makes it difficult to retrieve the important data. Thus, before conducting an effective system analysis and extracting data for program comprehension, it is necessary to select the relevant messages, and to expose only the meaningful information.

In this work we focus both on classifying e-mails that hold fragments of the source code of a system, and on extracting the source code pieces inside the e-mail. We devised and analyzed a number of lightweight techniques to accomplish these tasks. To assess the validity of our techniques, we manually inspected and annotated a statistically significant number of e-mails from five unrelated open source software systems written in Java. With such a benchmark in place, we measured the effectiveness of each technique in terms of precision and recall.},
	keywords = {argouml, email, freenet, jmeter, mailing lists, mina, natural language, openjpa, source code},
	url = {http://www.inf.usi.ch/phd/bacchelli/publications.php},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/icpc2010.pdf},
	author = {Bacchelli, Alberto and D{\textquoteright}Ambros, Marco and Lanza, Michele}
}
@conference {1360,
	title = {Benchmarking Lightweight Techniques to Link E-Mails and Source Code},
	booktitle = {2009 16th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering},
	year = {2009},
	note = {"We present different lightweight approaches that, exploiting the specific characteristics of e-mails and the ones of the source code, are capable of establishing a bi-directional link between source code entities and e-mails"

"We analyzed ArgoUML1, a UML modelling tool written in Java, developed over the course of approximately 9 years, and made available under the BSD Open Source License. We consider the release 0.28 (March 2009) that comprehends 2,197 classes. We employed the lightweight approaches to map such classes to the related e-mails in ArgoUML mailing lists.
ArgoUML e-mails are stored in six mailing lists (see Table I), for a total amount of 79,175 messages"

Figure 4 is helpful to understand what this does.},
	pages = {205 - 214},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	organization = {IEEE},
	address = {Lille, France},
	abstract = {During the evolution of a software system, a large amount of information, which is not always directly related to the source code, is produced. Several researchers have provided evidence that the contents of mailing lists represent a valuable source of information: Through e-mails, developers discuss design decisions, ideas, known problems and bugs, etc. which are otherwise not to be found in the system.

A technical challenge in this context is how to establish the missing link between free-form e-mails and the system artifacts they refer to. Although the range of approaches is vast, establishing their accuracy remains a problem, as there is no benchmark against which to compare their performance.

To overcome this issue, we manually inspected a statistically significant number of e-mails pertaining to the ArgoUML system. Based on this benchmark, we present a variety of lightweight techniques to assign e-mails to software artifacts and measure their effectiveness in terms of precision and recall.},
	keywords = {argouml, email, mailing lists},
	isbn = {978-0-7695-3867-9},
	doi = {10.1109/WCRE.2009.44},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/wcre2009.pdf},
	author = {Bacchelli, Alberto and D{\textquoteright}Ambros, Marco and Lanza, Michele and Robbes, Romain}
}
@conference {971,
	title = {Branching and merging in the repository},
	booktitle = {the 2008 international workshopProceedings of the 2008 international workshop on Mining software repositories  - MSR {\textquoteright}08},
	year = {2008},
	month = {05/2008},
	pages = {19-22},
	publisher = {ACM Press},
	organization = {ACM Press},
	address = {New York, New York, USA},
	abstract = {Two of the most complex operations version control software allows a user to perform are branching and merging. Branching provides the user the ability to create a copy of the source code to allow changes to be stored in version control but outside of the trunk. Merging provides the user the ability to copy changes from a branch to the trunk. Performing a merge can be a tedious operation and one that may be error prone. In this paper, we compare file revisions found on branches with those found on the trunk to determine when a change that is applied to a branch is moved to the trunk. This will allow us to study how developers use merges and to determine if merges are in fact more error prone than other commits.},
	keywords = {argouml, changes, cvs2svn, diffj, revision, scm, source code, version control},
	isbn = {9781605580241},
	doi = {10.1145/1370750.1370754},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/p19-williams.pdf},
	author = {Spacco, Jamie and Williams, Chadd C.}
}
@conference {973,
	title = {On the relation of refactorings and software defect prediction},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2008 international workshop on Mining software repositories  - MSR {\textquoteright}08},
	year = {2008},
	month = {05/2008},
	pages = {35-38},
	publisher = {ACM Press},
	organization = {ACM Press},
	address = {New York, New York, USA},
	abstract = {This paper analyzes the influence of evolution activities such as refactoring on software defects. In a case study of five open source projects we used attributes of software evolution to predict defects in time periods of six months. We use versioning and issue tracking systems to extract 110 data mining features, which are separated into refactoring and non-refactoring related features. These features are used as input into classification algorithms that create prediction models for software defects. We found out that refactoring related features as well as non-refactoring related features lead to high quality prediction models. Additionally, we discovered that refactorings and defects have an inverse correlation: The number of software defects decreases, if the number of refactorings increased in the preceding time period. As a result, refactoring should be a significant part of both bug fixes and other evolutionary changes to reduce software defects.},
	keywords = {argouml, bug fixing, bug reports, defects, evolution, jboss, liferay, prediction, refactoring, spring, weka, xdoclet},
	isbn = {9781605580241},
	doi = {10.1145/1370750.1370759},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/p35-ratzinger.pdf},
	author = {Sigmund, Thomas and Gall, Harald C. and Ratzinger, Jacek}
}
