@conference {651,
	title = {Perceptions on F/OSS Adoption},
	booktitle = {OSS2007: Open Source Development, Adoption and Innovation (IFIP 2.13)},
	series = {IFIP International Federation for Information Processing },
	volume = {234/2007},
	year = {2007},
	month = {2007///},
	pages = {319 - 324},
	publisher = {Springer},
	organization = {Springer},
	chapter = {35},
	abstract = {This paper aims to reveal results of a survey run by the tOSSad1 project. The majority of survey variables devised to capture perception of public administrators around Europe regarding the importance they attach to the factors such as F/OSS product quality, availability of support, expertise and documentation, TCO, vendor lock-in, political influence, administrative attitudes, productivity, and training costs, all of which intermingle with financial, technical, legal, and personal issues. The analysis consist of depiction of respondents{\textquoteright} administration profile in terms of their F/OSS usage and adoption, descriptive summary and analyses of factors mentioned above, and statistical inferential analyses of survey items. Some valid statistical tests are conducted to understand, to discuss and to see the extend and significance of any F/OSS adoption generalizations for Europe based on the findings of this particular survey.
},
	issn = {978-0-387-72485-0},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72486-7_35},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/Perceptions\%20on\%20F\%20OSS.pdf},
	author = {Ozel, Bulent and Jovanovic, Uros and Oba, Beyza and van Leeuwen, Manon}
}
@conference {702,
	title = {Organization of Internet Standards},
	booktitle = {OSS2006: Open Source Systems (IFIP 2.13)},
	series = {IFIP International Federation for Information Processing},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {267 - 272},
	publisher = {Springer},
	organization = {Springer},
	abstract = {In this study we look at a body of standards documents in RFCs(Request For Comments) of IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force). The cross references between these documents form a network. Approaches from social network analysis are deployed to assess centrality of artifacts in this network and identify cohesive subgroups and levels of cohesion. Our results demonstrate major groups centered around key standard tracks, and application of network metrics reflect different levels of cohesion for these groups. As application of these techniques in such domains is unusual, possible uses in open source projects for strategizing are discussed.
},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34226-5_27},
	attachments = {https://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/Organization\%20of\%20Internet\%20Standards.pdf},
	author = {Gen{\c c}er, Mehmet and Oba, Beyza and {\"O}zel, B{\"u}lent and Tunal{\i}o{\u g}lu, V.}
}
