@article {1397,
	title = {How do open source communities blog?},
	journal = {Empirical Software Engineering},
	year = {2012},
	abstract = {We report on an exploratory study, which aims at understanding how software communities use blogs compared to conventional development infrastructures. We analyzed the behavior of 1,100 bloggers in four large open source communities, distinguishing between committing bloggers and other community members. We observed that these communities intensively use blogs with one new entry every 8 h. A blog entry includes 14 times more words than a commit message. When analyzing the content of the blogs, we found that committers and others bloggers write about similar topics. Most popular topics in committers{\textquoteright} blogs represent high-level concepts such as features and domain concepts, while source code related topics are discussed in 15\% of their posts. Other community members frequently write about community events and conferences as well as configuration and deployment topics. We found that the blogging peak period is usually after the software is released. Moreover, committers are more likely to blog after corrective engineering than after forward engineering and re-engineering activities. Our findings call for a hypothesis-driven research to (a) further understand the role of social media in dissolving the collaboration boundaries between developers and other stakeholders and (b) integrate social media into development processes and tools. },
	keywords = {blog, blogs},
	issn = {1573-7616},
	doi = {10.1007/s10664-012-9211-2},
	author = {Pagano, Dennis and Maalej, Walid}
}
@conference {1307,
	title = {How do developers blog?},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 8th working conference on Mining software repositories - MSR {\textquoteright}11},
	year = {2011},
	note = {publishing frequency, post structure, word usage, publication patterns, content},
	month = {05/2011},
	pages = {123-132},
	publisher = {ACM Press},
	organization = {ACM Press},
	address = {New York, New York, USA},
	abstract = {We report on an exploratory study, which aims at understanding how software developers use social media compared to conventional development infrastructures. We analyzed the blogging and the committing behavior of 1,100 developers in four large open source communities. We observed that these communities intensively use blogs with one new entry about every 8 hours. A blog entry includes 14 times more words than a commit message. When analyzing the content of the blogs, we found that most popular topics represent high-level concepts such as functional requirements and domain concepts. Source code related topics are covered in less than 15\% of the posts. Our results also show that developers are more likely to blog after corrective engineering and management activities than after forward engineering and re-engineering activities. Our findings call for a hypothesis-driven research to further understand the role of social media in software engineering and integrate it into development processes and tools.},
	keywords = {blog, communication, developer, eclipse, gnome, LDA, postgres, python},
	isbn = {9781450305747},
	doi = {10.1145/1985441.1985461},
	author = {Maalej, Walid and Pagano, Dennis}
}
@conference {968,
	title = {Can development work describe itself?},
	booktitle = {2010 7th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2010)2010 7th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2010)},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {191 - 200},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	organization = {IEEE},
	address = {Cape Town, South Africa},
	abstract = {Work descriptions are informal notes taken by developers to summarize work achieved in a particular session. Existing studies indicate that maintaining them is a distracting task, which costs a developer more than 30 min. a day. The goal of this research is to analyze the purposes of work descriptions, and find out if automated tools can assist developers in efficiently creating them. For this, we mine a large dataset of heterogeneous work descriptions from open source and commercial projects. We analyze the semantics of these documents and identify common information entities and granularity levels. Information on performed actions, concerned artifacts, references and new work, shows the work management purpose of work descriptions. Information on problems, rationale and experience shows their knowledge sharing purpose. We discuss how work description information, in particular information used for work management, can be generated by observing developers{\textquoteright} interactions. Our findings have many implications for next generation software engineering tools.},
	keywords = {developer interactions, work descriptions},
	isbn = {978-1-4244-6802-7},
	doi = {10.1109/MSR.2010.5463344},
	author = {Maalej, Walid and Happel, Hans-Jorg}
}
@conference {936,
	title = {From work to word: How do software developers describe their work?},
	booktitle = {2009 6th IEEE International Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)2009 6th IEEE International Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {121 - 130},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	organization = {IEEE},
	address = {Vancouver, BC, Canada},
	abstract = {Developers take notes about their work sessions, either to remember the work status and share it with collaborators, or because employers explicitly require this for project management matters. We report on an exploratory study which aims at understanding how software developers describe their work. We analyzed more than 750,000 work descriptions of about 2,000 professionals taken over 8 years in three settings. We observed several similarities in the content and time meta-data of work descriptions. Most frequent terms, such as top-30 performed activities, are used consistently. Particular templates such as ldquoACTION concerning ARTIFACT because of CAUSErdquo occur frequently. Developers described sessions that last 30-120 min. 4-16 times a day. Maintaining diaries seems to consume between 3-6\% of the total work time, and in 10\% of the sessions, developers did not describe their work in sufficient detail. We argue that our results make the first step towards automatically generating work diaries for software developers.},
	keywords = {apache, developers, diaries, eureka, mycomp, scm, work management system},
	isbn = {978-1-4244-3493-0},
	doi = {10.1109/MSR.2009.5069490},
	author = {Maalej, Walid and Happel, Hans-Jorg}
}
